Advertisement

The “War on Drugs”: A Failed Paradigm

  • Fida Mohammad
  • Gregory Fulkerson

Abstract

For nearly half a century, immense resources in the form of time and money have been poured into the empty ideological paradigm that is the “war on drugs-” The logic of this war is predicated on the naïve theory that “if the production can be halted, the market is not supplied, so consumers cannot purchase and use the substance.”1 After decades of experience, the futility of this approach has become clear to scholars and practitioners. We question, then, why governments, such as that of the US, have remained committed to the war on drugs paradigm. In considering this, we draw from the ideas of Kuhn,2 who popularized the concept of paradigm, and from Popper,3 who is best known for his notion of fais inability. In short, Popper claimed that theoretical ideas should be subjected to empirical scrutiny and, when appropriate, be falsified and rejected. However, this is often not what happens. As Kuhn noted, even in the face of contradictory evidence, social groups may remain committed to a paradigm and refuse to discuss the matter further creating and perpetuating a culture of epistemic closure. In spite of this entrenched commitment to the war on drugs paradigm, we see hope that a competing paradigm—a sustainable development or “public health” paradigm—may be gaining traction in at least some parts of the world.

Keywords

Organize Crime Drug Policy Drug Trade Epistemic Closure World Drug Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Mike Trace, Marcus Roberts, Axel Klein, and Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, Thailand’s “War on Drugs” (London: Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme, 2004), 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas Samuel Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karl R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations; The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Reprinted ed. (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruce Michael Bagley Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime in the Americas: Major Trends in the Tweniy-First Century (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Inter national Center for Scholars, Latin American Program, 2012), 5Google Scholar
  5. Russell Crandall, “Clinton, Bush and Plan Colombia,” Survival 44, no. 1 (2002): 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Russell Crandall, Driven by Drugs: US Policy Toward Colombia (Boulder, CO: Lynne Riemner Publishers, 2008), 193Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Bruce Bagiey, “Myths of Militarization: The Role of íhe Military in the War on Drugs in the Americas” (CoraiGables: North-South Center, October 1991).Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    See Ted Galen Carpenter’s chapter in this book titled, “The Drug War’s Damaging impact on Mexico and its Neighbors.” See also Ted Galen Carpenter, The Fire Next Door: Mexico’s Drug Violence and the Danger to America (Washington, DC: CATO Institute, 2012Google Scholar
  9. Clare Ribando Seelke and Kristin M. Finklea, U.S.-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida initiative and. Beyond (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2013).Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Garetb Morgan, images of Organization (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1986), 18.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Heinz Steinert, “The indispensable Metaphor of War: On Populist Politics and the Contradídions of the State’s Monopoly of Force,” Theoretical Criminology 7 (2003): 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 23.
    Femi Adegbuìu, “Military Option to the Challenge of Global Terrorism: A Successful Failure,” The IUP Journal of International Relations 6, no. 3 (2012): 7–30.Google Scholar
  13. 24.
    jacquelyn H. Flaskerud, “The Use (Meaning) of Language and the Term ‘War’,” issues in Mental Health Nursing 29, no. 7 (2008): 783–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 34.
    See Juan Gabriel Tokatlian, ed., Drogas y prohibición: Una vieja guerra, un nuevo debate (Buenos Aires: Editorial del Zorzal, 2010)Google Scholar
  15. Juan Gabriel Tokatlian, ed., La guerra contra las drogas en el mundo andino: Hacia un carnbio de para-digma (Buenos Aires: Editorial del Zorzal, 2009).Google Scholar
  16. 36.
    Costa in Sandeep Chawla et al., United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2004 (Vienna: UNODC, 2004).Google Scholar
  17. 37.
    Sandeep Chawla et al., United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2004 (Vienna: UNODC, 2004).Google Scholar
  18. 39.
    William N. Eíwood, Rhetoric in the War on Drugs: The Triumphs and Tragedies of Public Relations (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1994), 23.Google Scholar
  19. 56.
    Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fida Mohammad and Gregory Fulkerson 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fida Mohammad
  • Gregory Fulkerson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations