What Drives Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility? The Role of Ownership Concentration

  • Patrica Crifo
  • Marc-Arthur Diaye
  • Rim Oueghlissi
  • Sanja Pekovic


The considerable attention given to corporate social responsibility (CSR) could be explained by the fact that CSR has become an essential tool for a firm’s success. Corporate social responsibility refers to socially and environmentally friendly actions not only required by law, but going beyond compliance, privately providing public goods or voluntarily internalizing externalities (Crifo et al., 2014).


Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Corporate Governance Corporate Social Performance Ownership Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A. and Ganapathi, J. 2007. Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P.D. 2005. Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A. and Reeb, D.M. 2003. Founding Family Ownership and the Agency Cost of Debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslan, C.T. and Kumar, C.T. 2012. Strategic Ownership Structure and the Cost of Debt. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 2257–2299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltagi, B.H. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Barnea, A. and Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, D.P. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 683–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2010. Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility. Economica, 77, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird, R., Hall, A., Momente, F. and Reggiani, F. 2007. What Corporate Social Responsibility Activities are Valued by the Market?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2005. Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer, S. and Millington, A. 2006. Firm Size, Organizational Visibility and Corporate Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. Business Ethics, 15(1), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brammer, S. and Pavelin, S. 2008. Factors Influencing the Quality of Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brummer, J.J. 1991. Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. 2009. Microeconometrics Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, A. 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  16. Charreau, G. and Desbriere, P. 2001. Corporate Governance: Stakeholder Value Versus Shareholder Value. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng, I.-H., Hong, H. and Shue, K. 2013. Do Managers Do Good with Other People’s Money? NBER Working Paper no. 19432.Google Scholar
  18. Chih, H.L., Chih, H.H. and Chen, T.Y. 2010. On the Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: International Evidence on the Financial Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. 2002. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57, 2741–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connelly, B.L., Hoskisson, R.E., Tihanyi, L. and Certo, S.T. 2010. Ownership as a Form of Corporate Governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1561–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crifo, P., Forget, V. and, Teyssier, S. 2015. The Price of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices Disclosure: An Experiment with Professional Private Equity Investor. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30,168–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crifo, P., Diaye, M.-A. and Pekovic, S. 2014. CSR Related Management Practices and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Quantity-Quality Trade-off n French Data. International Journal of Production Economics. doi:10.1016/j. ijpe.2014.12.019Google Scholar
  23. Crifo, P. and Forget, V. 2014. The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Firm Level Perspective Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, doi: 10.1111/joes. 12055.Google Scholar
  24. Crifo, P., Reberioux, A. and Williamson, T. 2013. The Link between Corporate Governance and CSR: The Role of Board of Directors. IMS Luxembourg Report.Google Scholar
  25. Crilly, D., Zollo, M. and Hansen, M. 2012. Faking It or Muddling Through: Understanding Decoupling in Response to Stakeholder Pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dam, L. and Scholtens, B. 2013. Ownership Concentration and CSR Policy of European Multinational Enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Graaf, F.J. and Herkstroter, C.A.J. 2007. How Corporate Social Performance is Institutionalised within the Governance Structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Delgado-Garcia, J.B., de Quevedo Puente, E. and de la Fuente Sabaté, J. 2010. The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Reputation: Evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8, 540–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Demsetz, H. 1983. The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. European Commission 2011. A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Com. 681 final, 6.Google Scholar
  31. Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Forbes, D.P. and Milliken, F.J. 1999. Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision Making Groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, R.E 1984. Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, R.E. 2008. Ending the So-called Friedman-Freeman Debate in Dialogue: Towards Superior Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedman, M. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32–33, 122–126.Google Scholar
  36. Gompers, P.A., Ishii, J.L. and Metrick, A. 2003. Corporate governance and equity pices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goh, C.F., Rasli, A. and Khan, R.S. 2014. Economic Incentives for Family Controlling Shareholders and the Monitoring Role of Non-Dominant Large Shareholders in Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Manufacturing Firms in Malaysia. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(4), 471–483.Google Scholar
  38. Gomes, A. and Novaes, W. 2005. Sharing of Control versus Monitoring as Corporate Mechanisms. PIER Working Paper No. 01-029, University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Law & Economic Research Paper 01–12.Google Scholar
  39. Grant, J. and Kirchmaier, T. 2004. Corporate Ownership Structure and Performance in Europe. CEP Discussion Paper No. 631.Google Scholar
  40. Grolleau, G., Mzoughi, N. and Pekovic, S. 2012. Green Not (Only) For Profit: An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Environmental-Related Standards on Employees’ Recruitment. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hawan, O. and Kang, H.G. 2013. The Market for CSR: How Industry Structure Determines CSR. Working paper, Boston University School of Management.Google Scholar
  42. Heal, G. 2008. When Principles Pay — Corporate Social Responsibility and the Bottom Line. New York: Columbia Business School, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Henriques, I. and Sadorsky, P. 1996. The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental. Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jo, H. and Harjoto, M.A. 2012. The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khan, A., Muttakin, M.B. and Siddiqui, J. 2013. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim, J.-B., Li., B. and Liu, Z. 2014. Does social performance influence breadth of ownership? University of Hong Kong, Working paper.Google Scholar
  49. Lanfranchi, J. and Pekovic, S. 2014. How Green is My Firm? Workers’ Well-Being and Job Involvement in Environmentally-Related Certified Firms. Ecological Economics, 100, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lau, A. Nowland, J. and Young, A. 2007. In search of good governance for Asian family listed companies: a case study on Hong Kong. The Company Lawyer, 28 (10), 306–311Google Scholar
  51. Lepoutre, J. and Heene, A. 2006. Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahoney, L. and Roberts, R.W. 2007. Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance and Institutional Ownership in Canadian Firms. Accounting Forum, doi: 10.1016/j. accfor.2007.05.001Google Scholar
  53. Maignan, I. and Ralston, D.A. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from Businesses’ Self-Presentations. Journal of International Business, 33(3), 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Makni, R., Francoeur, C. and Bellevance, F. 2009. Causality between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Margolis J., Elfenbein H. and Walsh J. 2009. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and direction of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Harvard University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  56. Margolis, J. and Walsh, J. 2003. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. 1997. Event Studies in Management Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 626–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  59. Mundlak, Y. 1978. On the Pooling of Times Series and Cross Section Data. Econometrica, 46, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neubaum, D.O. and Zahra, S.A. 2006. Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism, and Coordination. Journal of Management, 32, 108–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ntim, C.G. and Soobaroyen, T. 2013. Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo-Institutional Framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oh, W.Y., Chang, Y.K. and Martynov, A. 2011. The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Orlitzky, M. 2001. Does Organizational Size Confound the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Overland, C., Mavruk, T. and Sjogren, S. 2012. Keeping It Real or Keeping It Simple? Ownership Concentration Measures Compared. Working paper, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  65. Peterson, D.K. 2004. The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business and Society, 43(3), 269–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reverte, C. 2009. Determinants of corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ronnegard, D. and Smith, N.C. 2011. Shareholders vs Stakeholders: How Liberal and Libertarian Political Philosophy Frames the Basic Debate in Business Ethics. INSEAD Working Paper 2011/132/ISIC.Google Scholar
  68. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A. and Waddock, S. 2010. Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turban, D.B. and Greening, D.W. 1996. Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ullmann, A.E. 1985. Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance of US Firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
  72. Waddock, S.A. and Graves, S.B. 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal,18(4), 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wahba, H. 2008. Does the Market Value Corporate Environmental Responsibility? An Empirical Examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood, D.J. 2010. Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Contributors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrica Crifo
  • Marc-Arthur Diaye
  • Rim Oueghlissi
  • Sanja Pekovic

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations