Abstract
The field of education has witnessed substantial changes owing to the paradigm shift in the philosophy of teaching and learning. The traditional teacher-centred classroom now appears to have given way to a more liberal approach, known as the student-centred approach. This paradigm shift has caused tremendous changes in the way teaching, learning and assessing are conducted. In today’s classrooms at the tertiary level, where the teacher-centred teaching approach traditionally dominated, the student-centred approach to learning has become increasingly common. Within this context, a large number of less restrictive assessment procedures have been introduced to second-language classrooms to replace traditional tests and examinations (Qian, 2010). Such assessment procedures are generally known as alternative assessments, which are often creative, nonintrusive and task-based. Therefore, they can be seen as an extension of day-to-day classroom activities tapping into higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills (Brown & Hudson, 1998; Richards & Schmidt, 2002). Alternative assessments typically emphasize both processes and products and are often transparent in scoring by pre-established assessment criteria. More importantly, most alternative assessment procedures call upon the classroom teacher to play a critical role in designing, coordinating and conducting the assessment, as well as making effective use of the feedback to help students further improve their language proficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30 (3), 255–264.
Barfield, R. L. (2003). Students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (4), 355–370.
Bentley, Y. & Warwick, S. (2013). Students’ experience and perceptions of group assignments. http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/page/STEM_2013_Information; http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/doi/book/10.11120/stem.hea.2013. University of Birmingham; Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference: Where Practice and Pedagogy Meet, 2013, 80–84.
Bourner, J., Hughes, M., & Bourner, T. (2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), 19–39.
Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 653–675.
Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students’ perceptions. International Education Journal, 4 (3), 177–191.
Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12 (1), 39–54.
Gibbs, G. (2009). The assessment of group work: Lessons from the literature. Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Brooks University, UK. Accessed August 30, 2014 from: http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/group_work/brookes_groupwork_gibbs_dec09.pdf
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14 (1), 37–49.
Hellström, D., Nilsson, F., & Olsson, A. (2009). Group assessment challenges in project-based learning — Perceptions from students in higher engineering courses. Proceedings of 2:a Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges Ingenjörsutbildningar, Lund, December 2009.
Lima, R. M., Carvalho, D., Flores, M. A., & Hattum-Janssen, N. V. (2007). A case study on project led education in engineering: students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32 (3), 337–347.
Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25 (3), 325–345.
Mello, J. A. (1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work settings. Journal of Management Education, 17 (2) 253–259.
Mills, P. (2003). Group project work with undergraduate veterinary science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (5), 527–538.
Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (1), 37–45.
Piezon, S. L., & Ferree, W. D. (2008). Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: A study of public university and US Naval War College students. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9 (2). Accessed August 30, 2014, from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/484/1034.
Qian, D. D. (2008). English language assessment in Hong Kong: A survey of practices, developments and issues. Language Testing, 25 (1), 85–110.
Qian, D. D. (2010). Alternative assessment procedures for language classrooms: Perceptions of frontline school teachers. In: Kao, T., Lin, Y. (Eds.), A new look at language teaching and testing: English as a subject and vehicle (pp. 273–294). Taipei: Language Training and Testing Center.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Pearson Education.
Walker, A. (2001). British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1 (1), 28–36.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 David D. Qian
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qian, D.D. (2016). Project-Based Group Assessment in the Second Language Classroom: Understanding University Students’ Perceptions. In: Yu, G., Jin, Y. (eds) Assessing Chinese Learners of English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55397-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44978-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)