Skip to main content

Project-Based Group Assessment in the Second Language Classroom: Understanding University Students’ Perceptions

  • Chapter
Assessing Chinese Learners of English

Abstract

The field of education has witnessed substantial changes owing to the paradigm shift in the philosophy of teaching and learning. The traditional teacher-centred classroom now appears to have given way to a more liberal approach, known as the student-centred approach. This paradigm shift has caused tremendous changes in the way teaching, learning and assessing are conducted. In today’s classrooms at the tertiary level, where the teacher-centred teaching approach traditionally dominated, the student-centred approach to learning has become increasingly common. Within this context, a large number of less restrictive assessment procedures have been introduced to second-language classrooms to replace traditional tests and examinations (Qian, 2010). Such assessment procedures are generally known as alternative assessments, which are often creative, nonintrusive and task-based. Therefore, they can be seen as an extension of day-to-day classroom activities tapping into higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills (Brown & Hudson, 1998; Richards & Schmidt, 2002). Alternative assessments typically emphasize both processes and products and are often transparent in scoring by pre-established assessment criteria. More importantly, most alternative assessment procedures call upon the classroom teacher to play a critical role in designing, coordinating and conducting the assessment, as well as making effective use of the feedback to help students further improve their language proficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30 (3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, R. L. (2003). Students’ perceptions of and satisfaction with group grades and the group experience in the college classroom. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (4), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, Y. & Warwick, S. (2013). Students’ experience and perceptions of group assignments. http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/page/STEM_2013_Information; http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/doi/book/10.11120/stem.hea.2013. University of Birmingham; Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference: Where Practice and Pedagogy Meet, 2013, 80–84.

  • Bourner, J., Hughes, M., & Bourner, T. (2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students’ perceptions. International Education Journal, 4 (3), 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12 (1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (2009). The assessment of group work: Lessons from the literature. Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Brooks University, UK. Accessed August 30, 2014 from: http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/group_work/brookes_groupwork_gibbs_dec09.pdf

  • Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14 (1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, D., Nilsson, F., & Olsson, A. (2009). Group assessment challenges in project-based learning — Perceptions from students in higher engineering courses. Proceedings of 2:a Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges Ingenjörsutbildningar, Lund, December 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, R. M., Carvalho, D., Flores, M. A., & Hattum-Janssen, N. V. (2007). A case study on project led education in engineering: students’ and teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32 (3), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25 (3), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello, J. A. (1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work settings. Journal of Management Education, 17 (2) 253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, P. (2003). Group project work with undergraduate veterinary science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (5), 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (1), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piezon, S. L., & Ferree, W. D. (2008). Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: A study of public university and US Naval War College students. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9 (2). Accessed August 30, 2014, from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/484/1034.

  • Qian, D. D. (2008). English language assessment in Hong Kong: A survey of practices, developments and issues. Language Testing, 25 (1), 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, D. D. (2010). Alternative assessment procedures for language classrooms: Perceptions of frontline school teachers. In: Kao, T., Lin, Y. (Eds.), A new look at language teaching and testing: English as a subject and vehicle (pp. 273–294). Taipei: Language Training and Testing Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2001). British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1 (1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 David D. Qian

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qian, D.D. (2016). Project-Based Group Assessment in the Second Language Classroom: Understanding University Students’ Perceptions. In: Yu, G., Jin, Y. (eds) Assessing Chinese Learners of English. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449788_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55397-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44978-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics