Advertisement

Face-to-face Interaction in a Speaking Test: A Corpus-Based Study of Chinese Learners’ Basic Spoken Vocabulary

  • Shasha Xu

Abstract

Natural language use constitutes the best source of linguistic evidence (Sinclair & Carter, 2004). The availability of large corpora changes considerably the possibility of research on authentic language data (Adolphs & Carter, 2013; Hunston, 2002). Recently, analyses of learner corpora against native speaker corpora provide insights for vocabulary teaching and learning. Corpus linguistics studies have included spoken language data for the purpose of developing pedagogical materials (Biber, 2006; Campoy-Cubillo, Bellés-Fortuño, & Gea-Valor, 2010; Granger, 2003). By comparing a learner corpus with a native speaker corpus, it is ‘possible to identify instances of learners’ underuse or overuse of spoken vocabulary, as well as to investigate how far, and in what ways, learners deviate from NS norms’ (Shirato & Stapleton, 2007, p. 394).

Keywords

Native Speaker Lexical Item Chinese Learner Test Taker English Native Speaker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adolphs, S., & Carter, R. (2013). Spoken corpus linguistics: From monomodal to multimodal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aijmer, K. (2009). A corpus study of ‘I don’t know’ and ‘dunno’ in learner spoken English. In A. H. Jucker, D. Schreier & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse (pp. 151–166). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  4. Aijmer, K., & Stenström, A. (2005). Approaches to spoken interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1743–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campoy-Cubillo, M. C., Bellés-Fortuño, B., & Gea-Valor, M. L. (2010). Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, R. (1998). Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal, 52(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crossley, S., & Salsbury, T. L. (2011). The development of lexical bundle accuracy and production in English second language speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Cock, S. (2007). Routinized building blocks in native speaker and learner speech: Clausal sequences in the spotlight. In M. C. Campoy & M. J. Luzón (Eds.), Spoken corpora in applied linguistics (pp. 217–233). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. De Cock, S. (2011). Preferred patterns of use of positive and negative evaluative adjectives in native and learner speech: An ELT perspective. In A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew & G. Aston (Eds.), New trends in corpora and language learning (pp. 198–212). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Flowerdew, L. (2009). Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy: A critical evaluation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15–34). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
  13. Gaviola, L., & Aston, G. (2001). Enriching reality: Language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal, 55(3), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Götz, S., & Schilk, M. (2011). Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL, and EFL. In M. Hundt & J. Mukherjee (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  15. Granger, S. (2003). The international corpus of learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 538–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He, A., & Xu, M. [何安平, & 徐曼菲] & [何安平, & 徐曼菲]. (2003). Small words in Chinese EFL learners’ spoken English [中国大学生英语口语 Small Words 的研究]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research [外语教学与研究] 35(6), 446–452.Google Scholar
  17. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James, F. B., & Edward, J. K. (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jin, Y. (2009). The national college English testing committee of China. In L. Cheng & A. Curtis (Eds.), English language assessment and the Chinese learner (pp. 44–59). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, D. Y. W. (2001). Defining core vocabulary and tracking its distribution across spoken and written genres: Evidence of a gradience of variation from the British National Corpus. Journal of English Linguistics, 29(3), 250–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCarthy, M. (1999). What constitutes a basic vocabulary for spoken communication? SELL: Studies in English Language and Linguistics, 1, 233–249.Google Scholar
  23. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2002). This, that and the other: Multi-word clusters in spoken English as visible patterns of interaction. Teanga, 21, 30–52.Google Scholar
  24. Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130–149.Google Scholar
  25. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Scott, M. (2004). Wordsmith Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Shirato, J., & Stapleton, P. (2007). Comparing English vocabulary in a spoken learner corpus with a native speaker corpus: Pedagogical implications arising from an empirical study in Japan. Language Teaching Research, 11(4), 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sinclair, J. M., & Carter, R. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Sinclair, J. M., & Renouf, A. (1990). A lexical syllabus for language learning. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 140–158). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Wei, N. [卫乃兴]. (2004). A preliminary study of the characteristics of Chinese learners’ spoken English [中国学习者英语口语语料库初始研究]. Modern Foreign Languages [现代外语], 27(2), 140–149.Google Scholar
  32. Wei, N., Li, W., & Pu, J. [卫乃兴, 李文中, & 濮建忠]. (2007). Design principles and annotation methods of the COLSEC corpus [COLSEC语料库的设计原则与标注方法]. Contemporary Linguistics [当代语言学], 9(3), 235–246.Google Scholar
  33. Xu, J., & Xu, Z. [许家金, & 许宗瑞]. (2007). Discourse management chunks in Chinese college learners’ English speech: A spoken corpus-based study[中国大学生英语口语中的互动话语词块研究]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research [外语教学与研究], 39(6), 437–443.Google Scholar
  34. Yang, H., & Wei, N. [杨惠中, & 卫乃兴]. (2005). Construction and data analysis of a Chinese learner spoken English corpus [中国学习者英语口语 语料库建设与研究]Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
  35. Zhang, G. (2011). Elasticity of vague language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(4), 571–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). Test review: College English Test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shasha Xu 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shasha Xu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations