Skip to main content

Historical Unfolding of Communitarian Marxist Property and Justice Theory

  • Chapter
Marxist Ethics within Western Political Theory
  • 168 Accesses

Abstract

The second stage of Marx’s communitarian property ethics unfolds in a block of communitarian Marxist writings on different social forms of property, from a time period stretching between Le Capital, the French translation of Das Kapital to texts applying Morgan’s account of tribal property in Ancient Society. This period between 1872 and 1883 reflects communitarian Marxist study of a variety of noncapitalist property systems. Indeed, communitarian Marxist theories of property ethics become increasingly sophisticated, the more the anthropological diversity of property comes to light. The new view is first clearly expressed in changes in Das Kapital of 1867 which Marx introduced into Le Capital, serialized between 1872 and 1875, when Marx became increasingly sympathetic to humanity’s communal property heritage. Exploration of this heritage flourished in (1) Marx’s own increasingly detailed research into Russian property, and (2) Engels’s research into Germanic-European property.1 Among the texts that stand out are Marx’s Ethnological Notebooks (EN) notes on Morgan of 1881–82; Marx’s concrete interventions into Russian politics, including his letter and four drafts of a letter to the exiled Russian Narodnik, Vera Zasulich; his letter to the Russian newspaper, Otechestvennye Zapiski; and Marx and Engels’s 1882 preface to the Russian edition of the Communist Manifesto; Engels’s 1882 “Mark” and 1884 OFPPS, and his prefaces and notes to the 1888 English and 1890 German editions of The Communist Manifesto.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For Marx’s gradual move between 1867 and 1883 to the new theory, see Haruki Wada, “Marx and Revolutionary Russia,” in Teodor Shanin, ed., Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the Peripheries of Capitalism (New York: Monthly Review, 1983), 44–48. For Marx’s late writings, see

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kevin Anderson, Marx at the Margins (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Marx, Ethnological Notebooks. Marx’s concrete interventions into Russian politics, including his letter and drafts of a letter to the exiled Russia Narodnik Vera Zasulich, his letter to the Russian newspaper, Otechestvennye Zapiski, and Marx and Engels’s 1882 preface to the Russian edition of the Communist Manifesto, all in Late Marx and the Russian Road; Engels’s: “The Mark” and OFPPS. Engels’s two prefaces are in Dirk J. Struik, ed., The Birth of the Communist Manifesto, (New York: International Publishers, 1980). For Marx’s original drafts and letter, see “Lettre à Vera Zasulich (Première Projet, Deuxième Projet, Troisième Projet, Quatrième Projet et Lettre à Vera Zasulich), in Marx/Engels, Gesamtausgabe, Erste Abteilung, Band 25 (East Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1985), 219–242. The drafts were originally published in a Russian edition in 1924 and a German edition in 1925. Shanin follows the original numbering of the drafts, but disagrees with it.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Stanley Moore, Marx against Markets (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992), 82–83; See Marx, Ethnological Notebooks, 120, 126–130, 133–136, 138–139, 143, 146–147, 163, 178, 180, 187, 197, 201– 202, 211–213, 221, 223, 226, 234, 249, 253, 256, 258, 295–297, 300, 302, 304, 307.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stanley Moore, Marx on the Choice between Socialism and Communism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980), 53; Lenin, State and Revolution, 95–96. See

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marx, Das Kapital: Kritik der Politischen Okonomie (Hamburg: Meisner, 1867), in Marx/Engels Gesamtausgabee, Zweite Abteilung, Band Sechs, Volume 1 (1987); Das Kapital Kritik der Politischen Okonimie Hamburg 1883 in Gesamtausgabe Zweite Abteilung, Band Acht, Vol 1 (1989); Das Kapital Kritik der Politischen Okonimie Hamburg 1890 in Gesamtausgabe, Zweite Abteilung, Band Zehn, Vol. 1, 1991). For a comparison of the four German editions and the French edition, see “Verzeichnis von Textstellem der Franzosischen die niche die 3. Und 4. Deutsche Ausgabe aufgenomment wurden?” in Gesamtausgabe, Zweite Abteilung, Band Zehn, Vol. 2, 732–83. Also see Anderson “The MEGA and the French Edition of Capital, Vol. 1.”

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marx, Le Capital, (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1969), 567. The change appears in Capital I, Volume 1, trans. Ben Fowkes (New York: Random House, 1976), 929. As Anderson notes in “The Unknown Marx’s Capital Volume 1,” 71–74, this translation, like all English translations, is based on Engels’s fourth German edition of 1890, in which he attempted to complete his insertion of the changes in Le Capital that he had begun to incorporate in his third German edition of 1883. Anderson believes that all these later German editions and all existing English translations fail to really incorporate all the significant changes in Le Capital. Le Capital was published in January 1875; see Wada, “Marx and Revolutionary Russia,” 48. Moore, Marx on the Choice, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raya Dunaevskaya, Rosa Luxembourg, Women’s Liberation and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities, 1982), 175–179, thought that Marx was both more critical of and more favorable to communal property than Engels, that Marx definitely sketched a non-Western communal property route. But she does not take into consideration that Germanic property, which both Marx and Engels saw as communal, was also Western.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karl Marx, March 14, 1868 letter to Engels, in der Briefwechsel zwiischen K. Mars and F Engels (Stuttgart, 1913). Marx refers specifically to Maurer’s book of 1856, which is G. L. Maurer, Geschichte der MarkenVerfaassung in Deutschland (Erlangen: Enke, 1856). Shanin continues to label this the “First Draft”—as I do—because of the historical textual scholarship which has labeled it such, but in fact, he considers it to be the second draft.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Norman Arthur Fischer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischer, N.A. (2015). Historical Unfolding of Communitarian Marxist Property and Justice Theory. In: Marxist Ethics within Western Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137447449_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics