Advertisement

The ‘Dark Matter’ in the Search for Sustainable Growth: Energy, Innovation and the Financially Paradoxical Role of Climate Confidence

  • Jean-Charles Hourcade
  • Michael Grubb
  • Aurélie Méjean
Part of the International Papers in Political Economy Series book series (IPPE)

Abstract

Theories of economic growth have long recognised that innovation is a key but poorly understood force — the ‘residual’ of neoclassical growth models. These models have no representation of intermediate goods, or of the factors that generate and diffuse innovations, including learning-by-doing and scale economies; they are thus unable to picture how a suite of economic and institutional changes triggers waves of long-term economic progress, which in practice has been the long-term historical pattern. The absence of finance in these models is particularly problematic. The centrality of financial structures to understanding patterns of economic growth is acute concerning policies to shape efficiency, innovation and infrastructure in ways compatible with energy and climate security, since these require substantial upfront investment. However, uncertainty and a lack of confidence deter such investment. Environmental policy could reduce risk and thereby shape ultimately profitable investments. The paper outlines deep relationships between energy/carbon-related finance and wider debates about financial systems after the crisis. The paper finally proposes an agenda for future research towards alternatives to classical growth models, intended to address some of their limitations.

Keywords

technical change economic growth theory energy climate finance 

JEL Classification

B4 O30 O41 O44 Q01 Q43 Q50 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., Hemous, D. (2012) ‘The Environment and Directed Technical Change’, American Economic Review, 102, 131–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992) ‘A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction’, Econometrica, 60, 323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aglietta, M. and Bai, G. (2012) La voie chinoise capitalisme et empire, Paris: O. Jacob.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad, S. (1966) ‘On the Theory of Induced Invention’, The Economic Journal, 76, 344–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow, K.J. (1962) ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing’, The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arthur, W.B. (1989) ‘Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events’, The Economic Journal, 99, 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayres, R.U., Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den and Gowdy, J.M. (1998) Viewpoint: Weak Versus Strong Sustainability, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 98–103/3.Google Scholar
  8. Ayres, R.U. and Kneese, A.V. (1969) ‘Production, Consumption, and Externalities’, The American Economic Review, 59, 282–97.Google Scholar
  9. Berndt, E.R. (1983) Quality Adjustment in Empirical Ddemand Analysis, Sloan Working Papers. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  10. Berndt, E.R. and Wood, D.O. (1984) Energy Price Changes and the Induced Revaluation of Durable Capital in U.S. Manufacturing During the OPEC Decade, Energy Laboratory Report No. MIT-EL 84–003, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Common, M. and Perrings, C. (1992) ‘Towards an Ecological Economics of Sustainability’, Ecological Economics, 6, 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly, H.E. (1997) ‘Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz’, Ecological Economics, 22, 261–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frondel, M. and Schmidt, C.M. (2002) ‘The Capital-Energy Controversy: an Artifact of Cost Shares?’, The Energy Journal, 23, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galbraith, J.R. (1973) Designing Complex Organizations, 1st edn. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Ghersi, F. and Hourcade, J.C. (2006) ‘Macroeconomic Consistency issues in E3 Modeling: The Continued Fable of the Elephant and the Rabbit’, The Energy Journal, 39–62.Google Scholar
  16. Giraud, P.-N. (2001) Le Commerce des promesses: Petit traité sur la finance moderne. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  17. Goldemberg, J. (1992) ‘Energy, Technology, Development’, Ambio, 21, 14–17.Google Scholar
  18. Goulder, L.H. and Schneider, S.H. (1999) ‘Induced Technological Change and the Attractiveness of CO2 Abatement Policies’, Resource and Energy Economics, 21, 211–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griliches, Z. (1957) ‘Hybrid Corn: an Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change’, Econometrica, 25, 501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grubb, M., Hourcade, J.-C. and Neuhoff, K. (2014) Planetary Economics: Energy, Climate Change and the Three Domains of Sustainable Development, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hallegatte, S., Ghil, M., Dumas, P. and Hourcade, J.-C. (2008) ‘Business Cycles, Bifurcations and Chaos in a Neo-classical Model with Investment Dynamics’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton, J.D. (2008) ‘Oil and the Macroeconomy’, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Harcourt, G.C. (1969) ‘Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital’, Journal of Economic Literature, 7, 369–405.Google Scholar
  24. Hartwick, J.M. (1978) ‘Substitution Among Exhaustible Resources and Intergenerational Equity’, The Review of Economic Studies, 45, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hicks, J.R. (1963) The Theory of Wages, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Hogan, W.W. and Jorgenson, D.W. (1991) ‘Productivity Trends and the Cost of Reducing CO2 Emissions’, The Energy Journal, 12, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hogan, W.W. and Manne, A.S. (1977) ‘Energy Economy Interactions: the Fable of the Elephant and the Rabbit?’, in: Energy and the Economy, EMF Report 1 of the Energy Modeling Forum. Institute for Energy Studies, Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
  28. Hourcade, J.C., Jaccard, M., Bataille, C. and Ghersi, F. (2006) ‘Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges’, The Energy Journal, 2, 1–12.Google Scholar
  29. Hourcade, J.C., Perrissin Fabert, B. and Rozenberg, J. (2012) ‘Venturing into Uncharted Financial Waters: an Essay on Climate-Friendly Finance: International Environmental Agreements’, Politics, Law and Economics, 12, 165–86.Google Scholar
  30. Hourcade, J.-C., Pottier, A. and Etienne, E. (2012) The Environment and Directed Technical Change: Comment, SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1991109, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  31. Jensen, M.C. (1986) ‘Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers’, The American Economic Review, 76, 323–9.Google Scholar
  32. Johansen, L. (1959) ‘Substitution versus Fixed Production Coefficients in the Theory of Economic Growth: a Synthesis’, Econometrica, 27, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jorgenson, D.W. and Fraumeni, B.M. (1981) Relative Prices and Technical Change: Modeling and Measuring Natural Resources Substitution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jorgenson, D.W. and Wilcoxen, P.J. (1993) ‘Reducing US Carbon Emissions: an Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment’, Resource and Energy Economics, 15, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaldor, N. (1957) ‘A Model of Economic Growth’, Economic Journal, 68, 591–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaldor, N. (1961) Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Kalecki, M. (1939) Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  38. Lange, O. (1936) ‘On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part One’, The Review of Economic Studies, 4, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manne, A.S. and Richels, R.G. (1992) Buying Greenhouse Insurance: the Economics Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, J.M. (1988) ‘L’intensité énergétique de l’économie l’activité économique dans les pays industrialisés : les évolutions de très longue période livrent-elles des enseignements utiles?’, Economies et sociétés 4, 9–27.Google Scholar
  41. Mazzucato, M. (2011) The Entrepreneurial State, London: Demos.Google Scholar
  42. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W.W. (1974) The Limits to Growth: a Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  43. Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1979) ‘The Influence of Market Demand Upon Innovation: a Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies’, Research Policy, 8, 102–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakicenovic, N. and Nordhaus, W. (2011) ‘Editors’ Introduction: the Economics of Technologies to Combat Global Warming’, Energy Economics, 33, 565–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G. and Schuette, H.L. (1976) ‘Technical Change in an Evolutionary Model’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neuhoff, K., Fankhauser, S., Guerin, E., Hourcade, J.C., Jackson, H., Rajan, R. and Ward, J. (2010) Structuring International Financial Support for Climate Change Mitigation in Developing Countries, Discussion paper no. 976, German Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
  48. North, D.C. (1991) ‘Institutions STÖR’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearce, D.W. and Atkinson, G. (1995) ‘Measuring Sustainable Development’, in D.W. Bromley (ed.), The Handbook of Environmental Economics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Perez, C. (1985) ‘Microelectronics, Long Waves and World Structural Change: New Perspectives for Developing Countries’, World Development, 13, 441–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perez, C. (2002) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pomeranz, K. (2009) The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Popp, D. (2006) ‘Comparison of Climate Policies in the ENTICE-BR Model’, The Energy Journal Endogenous Technological Change, 163–74.Google Scholar
  54. Ramsey, F.P. (1928) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Saving’, The Economic Journal, 38, 543–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Romer, P.M. (1986) ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Romer, P.M. (1990) ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy 98, S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sala-i-Martin, X.X. (1996) ‘The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis’, The Economic Journal, 106, 1019–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Samuelson, P.A. (1962) ‘Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: the Surrogate Production Function’, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scherer, F.M. (1982) ‘Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, 627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Solow, R.M. (1956) ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Solow, R.M. (1957) ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Solow, R.M. (1974) ‘Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources’, The Review of Economic Studies, 41, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Solow, R.M. (1986) ‘On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, 141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Solow, R.M. (1988) ‘Growth Theory and After’, The American Economic Review, 78, 307–17Google Scholar
  65. Solow, R.M. (2000) ‘Toward a Macroeconomics of the Medium Run’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Solow, R.M. (2001) Addendum to Robert R.M. Solow’s Nobel Prize Lecture ‘Growth Theory and After.’ http://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/nobelp/1987_001.html.Google Scholar
  67. Stern, N. (2012) ‘How We Can Respond and Prosper: the New Energy-industrial Revolution’ (Lecture), Lionel Robbins Memorial Lecture Series. London School of Economics, London, UK.Google Scholar
  68. Stiglitz, J. (1990) ‘Comments: Some Retrospective Views on Growth Theory’, in Growth, Productivity, Unemployment: Essays to Celebrate Bob Solow’s Birthday, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  69. Toman, M., Krautkrämer, J. and Pezzey, J. (1995) ‘Neoclassical Economic Growth Theory and Sustainability, in D. Bromley (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 139–65.Google Scholar
  70. Uzawa, H. (1965) ‘Optimum Technical Change in An Aggregative Model of Economic Growth’, International Economic Review, 6, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zenghelis, D. (2011) A Macroeconomic Plan for a Green Recovery, Policy paper, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jean-Charles Hourcade, Michael Grubb and Aurélie Méjean 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Charles Hourcade
    • 1
  • Michael Grubb
    • 2
  • Aurélie Méjean
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)France
  2. 2.UK Government AdvisorUK
  3. 3.International Research Centre for the Environment and Development (CIRED)France

Personalised recommendations