Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consequences for Practice and Science

  • Chapter
Multirational Management

  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

Appropriately, comments on multirational management are often subject to the same complexity as multirational management itself. It is impossible to provide management in pluralistic contexts with simple “linear” recommendations. However, multirational management offers a wide and fertile field for management research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bird, A. and J. S. Osland (2005). Making sense of intercultural collaboration. International Studies of Management & Organization 35(4): 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanism of institutional change. Administrative Science Quarterly 6(3): 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. and E. Friedberg (1977). L’acteur et le système. Les contraintes de l’action collective. Paris, Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, J.-L., A. Langley and L. Rouleau (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations 60(1): 179–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, R., B. Szostak, J. Jourdan and P. H. Thornton (2013). Institutional logics as strategic resources. In Lounsbury, M. and E. Boxenbaum (eds) Institutional Logics in Action, Bingley, Emerald. Part A: 165–202.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2008). Fields, power, and social skill: A critical analysis of the New Institutionalisms. International Public Management Review 9(1): 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16: 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C. and I. Chowdhury. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as institutionally embedded entrepreneurs: Toward a new model of social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(3): 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C. and F. Santos. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In Lounsbury, M. and E. Boxenbaum (eds) Institutional Logics in Action. Part B: 3–35. Bingley, Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kuno Schedler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johannes Rüegg-Stürm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Kuno Schedler  & Johannes Rüegg-Stürm  & 

Copyright information

© 2014 Kuno Schedler and Johannes Rüegg-Stürm

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schedler, K., Rüegg-Stürm, J. (2014). Consequences for Practice and Science. In: Schedler, K., Rüegg-Stürm, J. (eds) Multirational Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444424_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation