Wording the World and Worlding the Word

  • Gabriel Vahanian
Part of the Radical Theologies book series (RADT)


Polytheistic, monotheistic, or pantheistic, no system, including theism as well as atheism, ever dawns on the human imagination, that does not bear the seed of its own subversion. It makes no difference if one is Greek or Jew, for remember Socrates and Jesus were equally charged with atheism as also were the latter’s followers by the Roman authorities. Like history, religion too is written from the standpoint of the winner. This standpoint seeks either to belie or vindicate legends like that of Prometheus or in particular that of Abraham smashing idols of his father.1 Not to mention Jesus and his strictures against the Temple.2 So that, recalling Feuerbach’s laconic verdict, today’s would-be “atheism is tomorrow’s religion.”3 With this difference, however: today’s atheism is methodological rather than ideological, practical rather than “confessional.”4 Wasn’t it the Devil who, in the Gospel, put faith as well as God into question by leaning on Scriptures and, slyly, muttering, “Will God really be there when you need him? ”5


Religious Language Practical Theism Final Vocabulary Biblical Tradition Roman Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity (1841; repr., New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1957); (see also Preface, p. xxxvii: “Theology Is Anthropology”).Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    G. Elijah Dann, Leaving Fundamentalism (Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  3. Darrell J. Fasching, No One Left Behind: Is Universal Salvation Biblical (Bloomington, IN: iUniverse, 1996, 2011 ).Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Martin Luther, Christian Liberty, ed. Harold J. Grim ( Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1957 ).Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Michel de Certeau et al., Le m é pris du monde ( Paris: Cerf, 1965 ), p. 191.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Reinhold Niebuhr, The Nature and Destiny of Man, vol. 2 (New York: Charles Scribner’s, 1941 ), p. 166.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Martin Buber, Between Man and Man ( Boston: Beacon Press, 1955 ), p. 58.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Rudolf Bultmann, The Presence of Eternity: History and Eschatology, Gifford Lectures 1955 (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1957 ), p. 35.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    Jacques Maritain, “Signe et symbole,” Revue thomiste (April 1938), p. 315.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Ian Ramsey, Religious language (New York: Macmillan,1957).Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    John Macquarie, An Existentialist Theology (London: SCM Press,1955); Principles of Christian Theology (New York: Scribner’s,1966).Google Scholar
  13. 22.
    Gerhard Kitell (ed.), Theologisches W ö rterbuch Zum Neuen Testament (1933; repr., Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer,1960).Google Scholar
  14. 23.
    Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz, The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998), p. 346: “But he [Jesus] puts metaphorical sign language at the centre of his preaching: the parables, which are an undogmatic way of speaking of God.”Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabriel Vahanian 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Vahanian

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations