Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of the Middle East ((PEME))

  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

The assumption that trade and peace have a positive correlation is something that has been believed for millennia.1 Further, such belief in the positive trade-peace relationship has manifested itself in the form of government and intergovernmental policies. More recently, liberal democracies in the West have implemented policies based on this assumption and, in turn, have expanded this policy when concerned with dealings with a foreign actor (or state). However, this policy has not always led to the desired peace-through-trade outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Brackets added for clarity. In EU, “Treaty on the European Union Together with the Complete Text of the Treaty Establishing the European Community” (Brussels: EU, August 31, 1992), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. EU, “Treaty of Rome” (Rome: EU, March 25, 1957), 75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. These activities included developments such as the 1979 US Tehran embassy takeover that resulted in 52 Americans being held hostage by supporters of the Iranian Revolution. Magnus Ranstorp, Hizb’allah in Lebanon: The Politics of the Western Hostage Crisis (London: Macmillan, 1997), 1. This also included Iran’s poor human rights record. EP, “The EU-Iran Human Rights Dialogue,” Briefing Paper (Brussels: EU, June 2007), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Plutarch (ca. AD 100). Quoted in Douglas A. Irwin, Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Hume, Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects (Edinburgh: A. Millar, A. Kincaid, A. Donaldson, 1758), 330, https://play.google.com/store/books /details?id=EHQRAAAAIAAJ&rdid=book-EHQRAAAAIAAJ&rdot=1 (accessed June 4, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles-Louis Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (New York: Hafner, 1966 [1748]), 316.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andrew Moravcsik, Liberalism and International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Harvard Center for International Affairs, 1992), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael W. Doyle, “Liberalism and World Politics,” The American Political Science Review 80:4 (1986): 1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrew Kydd, “Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation,” International Organization 54:2 (2000): 325–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace (Minneapolis, MN: Filiquarian Publishing, 2007 [1795]), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John R. O’Neal and George Russett, “The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992,” World Politics 52:1 (1999): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The UN cited in Oles M. Smolansky and Bettie M. Smolansky, The USSR and Iraq: The Soviet Quest for Influence (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991), 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. With the help of, among others, French and German technology and intelligence, in Kenneth R. Timmerman, The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq (London: Bantam Books, 1991), 358.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Øystein Noreng, Crude Power: Politics and the Oil Market (London: IB Tauris, 2006), 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Federal Research Division, Saudi Arabia: A Country Study (Washington, DC: Kessinger Publishing, 2004), 152.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. W. Polachek and C. Seiglie, “Trade, Peace and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute,” Institute for the Study of Labor, Discussion Paper No. 2170 (June 2006), 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patrick J. McDonald, “Peace through Trade or Free Trade?,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48:4 (2004): 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pascal Lamy, “Middle East Trade: An EU Perspective,” World Economic Forum (WEF) (Amman: WEF, 2003), p. 3; and Mark Hester, “Middle East and North Africa take Growing Share of EU’s Gas Market,” Oil and Energy Trends 32:8 (2008): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richard N. Haass, Transatlantic Tensions: The U.S., Europe, and Problem Countries (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999), 77.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1937), 90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anthony T. Kronman, “Contract Law and the State of Nature,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1:1 (1985): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johan Galtung, “Twenty-Five Years of Peace Research: Ten Challenges and Some Responses,” Journal of Peace Research 22:2 (1985): 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. John Black, Oxford Dictionary of Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 469.

    Google Scholar 

  24. David G. Anderson, “The International Arms Trade: Regulating Conventional Arms Transfers in the Aftermath of the Gulf War,” American University International Law Review 7:4 (1992): 752–753.

    Google Scholar 

  25. For examples, see Alan Friedman, Spider’s Web: The Secret History of How the White House Illegally Armed Iraq (Michigan: Bantam Books, 1993) and Timmerman, The Death Lobby.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Amir M. Kamel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamel, A.M. (2015). Introducing the Subject. In: The Political Economy of EU Ties with Iraq and Iran. The Political Economy of the Middle East. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137439802_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics