Skip to main content

The Social Neuroscience of Power and Its Links with Empathy, Cooperation and Cognition

  • Chapter
The Intoxication of Power

Abstract

The concept of power is of interest to researchers in a number of different fields. Historians, philosophers, political scientists, sociologists and now psychologists and neuroscientists have each conceptualised and studied power in their own way. Sociologists such as Max Webber conceived of power as ‘the probability that one actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his own will despite resistance, regardless of the basis on which this probability rests’ (Weber et al., 1978: 53). Political philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes understood power as the ‘present means to obtain some future apparent good’ (2010: 40). And political scientists such as Robert Dhal made attempts to formally express power thus: ‘A has power over B to the extent that he can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do’ (1957: 202). Though there is a noticeable overlap between the different definitions, it would be impossible to find a definition of power that satisfies the research interests of all disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amodio, D. M., and Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268–277. doi: 10.1038/ nrn1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., and Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., and Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00734.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., and Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R. T., Macaluso, E., Avenanti, A., Santangelo, V., Cazzato, V., and Aglioti, S. M. (2013). Their pain is not our pain: Brain and autonomic correlates of empathic resonance with the pain of same and different race individuals. Human Brain Mapping, 34(12), 3168–3181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., and Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28(2), 174–193. doi: 10.1002/bsl.925

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Reflexive empathy: On predicting more than has ever been observed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., and Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social -psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Griffitt, C. A., Barrientos, S., Brandt, J. R., Sprengelmeyer, P., and Bayly, M. J. (1989). Negative-state relief and the empathy altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(6), 922–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L., and Chen, Y.-R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 994–1014. doi: 10.103 7/a0026651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S. -J., Bristow, D., Bird, G., Frith, C., and Ward, J. (2005). Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synesthesia. Brain, 128, 1571–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bombari, D., Mast, M. S., Brosch, T., and Sander, D. (2013). How interpersonal power affects empathic accuracy: Differential roles of mentalizing vs. mirroring? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00375

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, P. A., Terburg, D., and van Honk, J. (2010). Testosterone decreases trust in socially naive humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 9991–9995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911700107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briganti, F., Della Seta, D., Fontani, G., Lodi, L., and Lupo, C. (2003). Behavioral effects of testosterone in relation to social rank in the male rabbit. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-R., Peterson, R. S., Phillips, D. J., Podolny, J. M., and Ridgeway, C. L. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table–Attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23(2), 299–307. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., and Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., and Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J. T. (1994). Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., and Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioral Brain Research, 41, 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multi-dimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JCAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 75, 989–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont, F., and Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. B. M., and Tyack, P. L. (Eds.). (2009). Animal Social Complexity: Intelligence, Culture, and Individualized Societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., and Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11(1), 86–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. W. (2009). Who rules America? Challenges to corporate and class domi-nance. McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J., and Fehr, E. (2011). The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., and Galinsky, A. D. (2011). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 391–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyp-ing. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., and Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. In A. W. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd edn), pp. 678–692. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • French Jr, J. R., and Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power, pp. 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., and Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianaros, P. J., Horenstein, J. A., Cohen, S., Matthews, K. A., Brown, S. M., Flory, J. D.,... Hariri, A. R. (2007). Perigenual anterior cingulate morphology covaries with perceived social standing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(3), 161–173. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, a., Fiske, S. T., and Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 227–256. doi: 10.1177/1368430200003003001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, R. (1909): The introduction of the word ‘Empathy’ into English. BRANCH: Britain, Representation and Nineteenth-Century History. Dino Franco Felluga (Ed.). Extension of Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net. http://www.branchcollective.org (Accessed 20 July 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., and Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 111–127. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Cohen, T. R., and Livingston, R. W. (2012). Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 351–366. doi: 10.1037/a0025515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselhuhn, M. P., and Wong, E. M. (2012). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 571–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., and Singer, T. (2010). Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron, 68(1), 149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., and Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol Hum Behav, 22(3), 165–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (2010). Leviathan. Digireads.com.

  • Hogeveen, J., Inzlicht, M., and Obhi, S. S. (2013). Power changes how the brain responds to others. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142, 1–9. doi: 10.1037/ a0033477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogeveen, J., Inzlicht, M., and Obhi, S. S. (2014). Power changes how the brain responds to others. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(2), 755–762. doi: 10.103 7/a0033477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S., Clark, A., and Kiverstein, J. (2008). The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(1), 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, W. D., Davis, K. D., Lozano, A. M., Tasker, R. R., and Dostrovsky, J. O. (1999). Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(5), 403–405. doi: 10.1038/8065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabbi, M., Swart, M., and Keysers, C. (2007). Empathy for positive and negative emotions in gustatory cortex. NeuroImage, 34, 1744–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, B., Waser, P. M., Creel, S. R., Creel, N. M., Elliott, L. F., and Minchella, D. J. (1994). Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 47(1), 65–75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhi- bition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. doi: 10.1037/0033–295X.110.2.265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., and Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716–1723. doi: 10.1177/09567 97610387613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., and Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. doi: 10.1037/a0028756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., and Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, C., Decety, J., and Singer, T. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage, 54, 2492–2502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ly, M., Haynes, M. R., Barter, J. W., Weinberger, D. R., and Zink, C. F. (2011). Subjective socioeconomic status predicts human ventral striatal responses to social status information. Current Biology, 21(9), 794–797. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokros, A., Menner, B., Eisenbarth, H., Alpers, G. W., Lange, K. W., and Osterheider, M. (2008). Diminished cooperativeness of psychopaths in a prisoner’s dilemma game yields higher rewards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 406–413. doi: 10.1037/0021–843x.117.2.406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., de Oliveira-Souzat, R., and Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(42), 15623–15628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604475103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, E., and Glickman, S. (1992). Hormones and aggressive behavior. In J. Becker, S. Breedlove, and D. Crews (Eds.), Behavioral Endocrinology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obhi, S. S., Hogeveen, J., Giacomin, M., and Jordan, C. H. (2014). Automatic imitation is reduced in narcissists. Journal of Experimental Psychology–Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 920–928. doi: 10.1037/a0034056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obhi, S. S., Swiderski, K., and Brubacher, S. (2012). Induced power changes the sense of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1547–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., and Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris Syndrome: An acquired personality disorder? A study of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers over the last 100 years. Brain, 132, 1396–1406. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., and Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. doi: 10.1037/a0020092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Cote, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., and Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(11), 4086–4091. doi: 10.1073 /pnas.11183 73109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., and Schriescheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven’s bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 387–411. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.97.3.387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B. H. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1530–2415.2008.00159.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, J. K., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Pagnoni, G., Goldsmith, D. R., Elfenbein, H. A., and Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 61(11), 1260–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, J. K., Goldsmith, D. R., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Elfenbein, H. A., Dagenais, J. E.,... Pagnoni, G. (2008). The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1256–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.033

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., and Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., and Fabbri–Destro, M. (2010). Mirror neurons: From discovery to autism. Experimental Brain Research, 200 (3–4), 223–237. doi: 10.1007/s00221–009–2002–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., and Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835–850. doi: 10.1037/a0016234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., and Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617–627. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., and Mesquita, B. (2000). Sentimental stereotypes: Emotional expectations for high-and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(5), 560–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1909). Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought processes. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2012). The student’s guide to social neuroscience. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., Roth, G., and Wittich, C. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerjal, T. et al. (2003). The genetic legacy of the Mongols. Am J Hum Genet., 72(3), 717–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D. S., Stein, J. L., and Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58(2), 273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Marco Vega and Jamie Ward

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vega, M., Ward, J. (2016). The Social Neuroscience of Power and Its Links with Empathy, Cooperation and Cognition. In: Garrard, P., Robinson, G. (eds) The Intoxication of Power. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137439666_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics