Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

As the quantitative overview of European Commission expert groups across the Directorates-General presented in Chapter 3 showed, the Directorate-General for Research and Technological Development is one of the Commission services with the highest number of expert groups (see Figure 3.2, also see Gerold, 1996). This is hardly surprising in view of this service’s history and tradition of strong expert involvement in the policy process (Gerold, 1996; Peschke, 2001). In line with the intensive engagement of experts in the policy process, policy making in DG Research is said to be dominated by technocratic concerns (Peterson and Sharp, 1998).

If there were big projects that needed a political direction and mass, critical mass, EURAB was providing this. (COM136:134)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Julia Metz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metz, J. (2015). Powerfully Shaping the Commission’s Research Agenda. In: The European Commission, Expert Groups, and the Policy Process. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437235_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics