Skip to main content

Corporate Ventriloquism: Corporate Advocacy, the Coal Industry, and the Appropriation of Voice

  • Chapter

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication book series (PSMEC)

Abstract

In the second decade of the 21st century, the U.S. coal industry is facing unprecedented challenges. While for many years coal provided nearly half of U.S. electricity, in the spring of 2012 that share dropped to below 40% and is expected to continue falling (Energy Information Administration, 2012).1 Coal production is increasing not in Appalachia, the primary U.S. source for coal historically, but in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin (Goodell, 2006). Market competition from the natural gas industry combined with well organized climate and anti-mountaintop removal (MTR) campaigns have significantly curtailed the production of new coal-fired power plants in the United States (EIA, 2012). Under the Obama administration, the Environmental Protection Agency appears to be somewhat more amenable than the Bush administration to regulating carbon emissions as a pollutant, and more interested in enforcing Clean Water Act provisions applicable to MTR mining (Broder, 2012). Combined with sharp reductions in the number of coal mining jobs due to the increased efficiency of coal mining techniques, these circumstances have put the coal industry in Appalachia in a precarious position.

Keywords

  • Coal Mining
  • Coal Industry
  • Energy Information Administration
  • Front Group
  • Environmental Advocacy

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/9781137433749_2
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-43374-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • “About Us.” (n.d.). Federation for American Coal, Energy and Security. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.facesofcoal.org/index.php?about-us

  • Another astroturf campaign [editorial] (4 September 2009). New York Times, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anspach, W., Coe, K., & Thurlow, C. (2007). The other closet? Atheists, homosexuals and the lateral appropriation of discursive capital. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(1), 95–119. doi:10.1080/ 17405900601149509

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. E., & York, R. (2010). Community economic identity: The coal industry and ideology construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology, 75(1), 111–143.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, D. (2010). Kennedy vs. Blankenship climate debate, Part 7/9, 8:48. Retrieved 4 June 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, J. (2012). Court reverses E.P.A. on big mining project. New York Times, 23 March. Retrieved 4 June 2012 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/24/science/earth/court-reverses-epa-saying-big-mining-project-can-proceed.html

  • Burns, S. S. (2007). Bringing Down the Mountains: The Impact of Mountaintop Removal on Southwest Virginia Communities. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. R. (2010). Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration (2012, May). Short-term energy outlook. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/pdf/steo_full.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • “FOC Bowl.” (2009). Friends of Coal. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.friendsofcoal.org/foc-bowl.html

  • Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodell, J. (2006). Big Coal: The Dirty Secret Behind America’s Energy Future. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggan, J. (2009). New “grassroots” pro-coal group backed by K-Street PR firm. DeSmogBlog. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.desmogblog.com/new-grassroots-pro-coal-group-backed-k-street-pr-firm

  • Johnson, B. (2009). The real FACES of coal: Adfero’s shadowy GOP beltway astroturf operatives. ThinkProgress Blog. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http:// thinkprogress.org/climate/2009/08/27/174412/faces-of-adfero/?mobile=nc

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. (2009, August 17). Greenpeace uncovers “astroturf” campaign to challenge U.S. climate bill. Green Business: Sustainable Living. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1806738/greenpeace-uncovers-astroturfcampaign-challenge-us-climate

  • “One Voice.” (2010). Friends of Coal. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www. friendsofcoal.org/the-friends-of-coal-speaking-with-one-voice.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeples, J. A. (2005). Aggressive mimicry: Wise use and the environmental movement. In S. Senecah (Ed.), Environmental Communication Yearbook, Vol. 2 (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeples, J. A. (2011). Downwind: Articulation and appropriation of social movementdiscourse. Southern Communication Journal, 76 (3), 248–263.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzullo, P. C. (2003). Resisting “national breast cancer awareness month”: The rhetoric of counterpublics and their cultural performances. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(4), 345–365. doi:10:80/0033563032000160981

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, J. W. (2009). FACES of coal are iStockphotos?! Grist, 27 August. Retrieved 4 June 2012 from http://grist.org/article/2009–08–27-faces-of-coal-are-istockphotos/

  • Scott, R. A. (2010). Removing Mountains: Extracting Nature and Identity in the Appalachian Coalfields. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. (2004). Greenwashing! Communication Arts, 46(7), 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, K. (2009). Who are the faces behind FACES of coal? Grist. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://grist.org/article/2009–08-20-who-are-the-faces-behind-faces-for-coal/

  • Smerecnik, K. R., & Renegar, V. R. (2010). Capitalistic agency: The rhetoric of BP’s Helios power campaign. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(2), 152–171.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • SourceWatch (2009). Federation for American Coal, Energy and Security. Last modified 27 August 2009. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Federation_for_American_Coal,_Energy_and_Security

    Google Scholar 

  • SourceWatch (2011). Friends of Coal. Last modified 8 February 2011. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Friends_of_ Coal

    Google Scholar 

  • “Supporter Quotes.” (n.d.) Federation for American Coal, Energy and Security. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.facesofcoal.org/index.php?supporter-quotes

  • Vivian, B. (2006). Neoliberal epideictic: Rhetorical form and commemorative politics on September 11, 2002. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(1), 1–26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, M. (2012). Some electoral math for “all you climate people.” Think Progress. Retrieved 7 March 2013 from http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/ 11/21/1227771/some-electoral-math-for-all-you-climate-people/

  • Watts, E. K. (2001). “Voice” and “voicelessness” in rhetorical studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87(2), 179–196.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • West Virginia Coal Association (2011). West Virginia Coal: Fueling an American Renaissance. Retrieved 3 June 2012 from http://www.wvcoal.com/docs/Coalo/o20Facts%202011.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (2006). The arbitron in-flight media study: Exploring frequent flyers’ engagement with airline magazines and in-flight TV. Arbitron. Retrieved 4 June 2012 from www.arbitron.com/downloads/in-flight_media_study.pdf

  • Williams, R. (1973). The Countty and the City. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Peter K. Bsumek, Jen Schneider, Steve Schwarze, and Jennifer Peeples

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bsumek, P.K., Schneider, J., Schwarze, S., Peeples, J. (2014). Corporate Ventriloquism: Corporate Advocacy, the Coal Industry, and the Appropriation of Voice. In: Peeples, J., Depoe, S. (eds) Voice and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433749_2

Download citation