‘Identity’ in International Relations and Foreign Policy Theory

  • Ursula Stark Urrestarazu
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)

Abstract

Quoting George Orwell, Frederick Cooper and Roger Brubaker once suggested that instead of elaborating alternative and better suited analytical concepts for social inquiry,1 the social sciences and the humanities have ‘surrendered’ to the word ‘identity’ — ‘the worst thing one could do with words’ (Brubaker and Cooper, 2000, 1).2 Indeed, the growing interest in this concept in social science in general, but also in International Relations (IR) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) in particular, has not led to a substantial clarification about the relevance of identity in contemporary (international) politics. Considering the significant proliferation of conceptualizations, it even seems as though the field now amounts to ‘definitional anarchy’ (Abdelal et al., 2006, 695), apparently depriving the concept of any analytical advantage. Nonetheless, identity-based theoretical explanations of foreign policy and international relations have continued to gain popularity, even across fairly different paradigms and schools.

Keywords

Foreign Policy International Relation Multidimensional Model World Politics Social Identity Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y., Johnston, A. I., and McDermont, R. (2006) ‘Identity as a Variable’, Perspectives on Politics, 4:(4), 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y., Johnston, A. I., and McDermont, R. (eds.) (2009). Measuring Identity. A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, M., Levin, S., and Henry, P. J. (2005) ‘Image Theory, Social Identity, and Social Dominance: Structural Characteristics and Individual Motives Underlying International Images’, Political Psychology, 26:(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almond, G. and Verba, S. (eds.) (1980) The Civic Culture Revisited (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  6. Ashizawa, K. (2008) ‘When Identity Matters: State Identity, Regional Institution Building and Japanese Foreign Policy’, International Studies Review, 10:(3), 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banchoff, T. (1999) ‘German Identity and European Integration’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(3), 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. (1999) ‘Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s Road to Oslo’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(1), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berenskoetter, F. (2010) ‘Identity in International Relations’, in Denemark R. (ed.) The International Studies Compendium Project (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 3594–3611.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, T. U. (1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Bloom, W. (1990) Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broderson, A. (1961) ‘National Character. An Old Problem Revisited’, in Rosenau, J. (ed.) International Politics and Foreign Policy (Glencoe: Free Press of Glencoe).Google Scholar
  14. Brubaker, R and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond “identity”’, Theory and Society, 29:(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  16. Crawford, N. (2000) ‘The Passion of World Politics. Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships’, International Security, 24:(4), 116–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Der Derian, J. (1987a) On Diplomacy. A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Der Derian, J. (1987b) ‘Mediating Estrangement. A Theory for Diplomacy’, Review of International Studies, 13:(2), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deutsch, K. W. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Sea (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  20. Diez, T. (1999) ‘Speaking “Europe”: The Politics of Integration Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6:(4), 598–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diez, T. (2010) ‘Europäische Identität, die EU und das Andere. Von der Vergangenheit und neuen Grenzziehungen’, in Winkler C. and J. Wienand (eds.) Die kulturelle Integration Europas (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).Google Scholar
  22. Finnemore, M. (1996) ‘Norms, Culture and World Politics. Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism’, International Organization, 50:(2), 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fitzgerald, T. (1993) Metaphors of Identity: A Culture–Communication Dialogue (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
  24. Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. (eds.) (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  25. Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  26. Holsti, K. (1970) ‘National Role Conception in the Study of Foreign Policy’, International Studies Quarterly, 14:(3), 233–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6:(4), 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2008) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horowitz, M. (2002) Research Report on the Use of Identity Concepts in International Relations (Harvard Identity Project, Weatherhead Center for International Relations).Google Scholar
  30. Hudson, V. (2005) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hudson, V. (2010) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Origins (1954–93) and Contestations’, The International Studies Encyclopedia (Denemark: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar
  32. Hudson, V. and Vore, C. (1995) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, Mershon International Studies Review, 39:(2), 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jepperson, R., Wendt, A., and Katzenstein, P. (1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  34. Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Krappmann, L. (1969) Soziologische Dimensionen der Identität: Strukturelle Bedingungen für die Teilnahme an Interaktionsprozessen (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta).Google Scholar
  36. Kratochwil, F. (1996) ‘Is the Ship of Culture at Sea or Returning?’ in Lapid, Y. and F. Kratochwil (eds.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  37. Kratochwil, F. (2007) ‘Re-Thinking the “Inter” in International Politics’, Millennium, 35:(3), 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurki, M. (2006) ‘Causes of a Divided Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory’, Review of International Studies, 32:(2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lapid, Y. (1996) ‘Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory’, in Lapid, Y. and F. Kratochwil (eds.) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  40. Legro, J. (2009) ‘The Plasticity of Identity under Anarchy’, European Journal of International Relations, 15:(1), 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Le Prestre, P. (ed.) (1997) Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transitions (Montreal: McGill University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Maier, M and Risse, T. (eds.) (2003) Europeanization, Collective Identities and Public Discourses. IDNET Final Report, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Maull, H. (1990/1991) ‘Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers’, Foreign Affairs, 69:(5), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  45. Mercer, J. (1995) ‘Anarchy and Identity’, International Organization, 49:(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mercer, J. (2010) ‘Emotional Beliefs’, International Organization, 64:(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milliken, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:(2), 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgenthau, H. (1967) Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  49. Nabers, D. (2008) ‘9/11 and the Rise of Political Fundamentalism in the Bush Administration. Domestic Legitimatization versus International Estrangement?’ Global Change, Peace and Security, 20:(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nabers, D. (2009) ‘Filling the Void of Meaning. Identity Construction in US Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 5:(2), 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neumann, I. (1993) ‘Russia as Central Europe’s Constituting Other’, East European Politics and Society, 12:(2), 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neumann, I. (1996a) Russia and the Idea of Europe. A Study in Identity and International Relations (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Neumann, I. (1996b) ‘Self and Other in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:(2), 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niebuhr, R. (1947) Moral Man and Immoral Society (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons).Google Scholar
  55. Omoniyi, T. (2006) ‘Hierarchies of Identity’, in Omoniyi, T. and G. White (eds.) The Sociolinguistics of Identity (London: Continuum International Publishing).Google Scholar
  56. Pye, L. and Verba, S. (eds.) (1965) Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  57. Ringmar, E. (1996) Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Risse, T., Hermann, R., and Brewer, M. (eds.) (2004) Transnational Identities. Becoming European in the European Union (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
  59. Rousseau, D. and van der Veen, M. (2005) ‘The Emergence of a Shared Identity: An Agent-Based Computer Simulation of Idea Diffusion’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49:(5), 686–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruggie, J. (1998) ‘Interests, Identity and American Foreign Policy’, in Ruggie, J. (ed.) Constructing the World Polity (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1986) ‘The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour’, in Worchel, S. and W. Austin (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers).Google Scholar
  62. Tessler, M. and Warriner, I. (1997) ‘Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey Data from the Middle East’, World Politics, 49:(2), 250–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner, J., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., and Wetherell, M. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  64. Verba, S. (1965) ‘Comparative Political Culture’, in Pye, L and S. Verba (eds.) Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  65. Waever, O. (2002) ‘Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy. Discourse Analysis as a Foreign Policy Theory’, in Hansen, L. and O. Waever (eds.) European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States (London: Routledge), 20–49.Google Scholar
  66. Walker, S. (1987) Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis (Durham: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
  67. Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  68. Walker, R. B. J. and Mendlowitz, S. H. (1990) Contending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Community (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  69. Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  70. Weber, C. (1995) Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  71. Weldes, J. (1993) Constructing National Interests: The Logic of US National Security in the Post-War Era. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  72. Weller, C. (1997) Collective Identities in World Society. Some Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations. World Society Research Group Working Paper No. 6. Frankfurt am Main and Darmstadt.Google Scholar
  73. Wendt, A. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organisation, 41:(3), 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organisation, 46:(2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wendt, A. (1994) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review, 88:(2), 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zalewski, M. (1995) ‘Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs, 71:(2), 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ursula Stark Urrestarazu 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ursula Stark Urrestarazu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations