Analysing Foreign Policy in a Context of Global Governance

  • Stephan Keukeleire
  • Simon Schunz
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)

Abstract

As analysts of real-world politics, political scientists reflect upon the changing nature of a social reality that is in quasi-constant flux. Since processes of ‘political transformation inevitably call […] into question the available concepts and categories through which that transformation can be understood’, this scholarly activity has to involve a regular dose of self-reflexivity about the objects and tools of the discipline (Kelstrup and Williams, 2000, 3). At times, adjustments aimed at reflecting the evolving social world occur quickly. Often, however, the theoretical and conceptual toolkits of the discipline lag behind evident modifications in the objects they intend to scrutinize. A case in point is the debate about whether, in an era of globalization and global governance, ‘foreign policy remains a key site of agency in international relations, or whether it is being steadily emptied of content’ (Hill, 2003, 16). Where foreign policy as a social practice is quite apparently being transformed by a rapidly evolving global political context, the analytical frameworks used to investigate it have tended to remain rather statist, static and under the influence of broad assumptions derived primarily from rational choice based, systemic International Relations (IR) theories (Alden and Aran, 2012). With this contribution, we intend to propose some novel paths for analysing foreign policy by investigating how it is impacted by — and needs to be investigated under conditions of — global governance.

Keywords

Foreign Policy United Nations Global Governance World Politics International Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (2011) ‘The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State’, in Mattli, W. and N. Woods (eds.) The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 44–88.Google Scholar
  2. Alden, C. and Aran, A. (2012) Foreign Policy Analysis. New Approaches (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Aviel, J. F. (1999) ‘The Evolution of Multilateral Diplomacy’, in Muldoon, J. P., J. Fagot Aviel, R. Reitano, and E. Sullivan (eds.) Multilateral Diplomacy and the United Nations Today (Boulder: Westview Press), 15–22.Google Scholar
  4. Bagger, T. (2012) ‘Cultural Diplomacy in the New Diplomatic Environment’, in Anheuer, H. and B. Lorentz (eds.) Bridging the Trust Divide. Cultural Diplomacy and Fostering Understanding between China and the West (Essen: Mercator Foundation), 42–47.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, M. and Sikkink, K. (2008) ‘From International Relations to Global Society’, in Reus-Smit, C. and D. Snidal (eds.) International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 62–83.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (2000) What Is Globalization? (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  8. Beeson, M. and Stubbs, R. (eds.) (2012) Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  9. Beisheim, M., Campe, S., and Schäferhoff, M. (2010) ‘Global Governance through Private Public Partnerships’, in Enderlein, H., S. Wälti, and M. Zürn (eds.) Handbook on Multi-Level Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 370–382.Google Scholar
  10. Betsill, M. and Corell, E. (2008) NGO Diplomacy. The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  11. Biermann, F. (2006) ‘Global Governance and the Environment’, in Betsill, M., K. Hochstetler, and D. Stevis (eds.) International Environmental Politics (Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 237–261.Google Scholar
  12. Brautigam, D. (2009) The Dragon’s Gift. The Real Story of China in Africa (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Breuning, M. (2007) Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brighi, E. and Hill, C. (2012) ‘Implementation and Behaviour’, in Smith, S., A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne (eds.) Foreign Policy. Theories Actors Cases (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 147–167.Google Scholar
  15. Carlsnaes, W. (2002) ‘Foreign Policy’, in Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castells, M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar
  17. Clark, I. (1999) Globalization and International Relations Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our Global Neighbourhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Compagnon, D. (2010) ‘Global Governance and the South: Blind Spot or Terra Incognita?’ International Studies Review, 12, 710–715.Google Scholar
  20. Cooper, A. F. Hocking, B., and Maley, W. (2008) Global Governance and Diplomacy: Worlds Apart? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P. (2006) ‘Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics’, Global Governance, 12, 185–203.Google Scholar
  22. Finkelstein, L. S. (1995) ‘What Is Global Governance?’ Global Governance, 1, 367–372.Google Scholar
  23. Fogarty, E. A. (2012) States, Nonstate Actors, and Global Governance. Projecting Polities. (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
  24. G-20 (2009) Leaders’ Statement (Pittsburgh, 25 September 2009).Google Scholar
  25. George, A. L. and Keohane, R. O. (1980) ‘The Concept of National Interests: Uses and Limitations’, in George, A. (ed.) Presidential Decisionmaking in Foreign Policy: The Effective Use of Information and Advice (Boulder: Westview Press), 217–238.Google Scholar
  26. Guzzini, S. (1993) ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’, International Organization, 47, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guzzini, S. (2013) Power, Realism and Constructivism (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  28. Haynes, J. (2012) Religious Transnational Actors and Soft Power (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  29. Held, D. and McGrew A. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in Held, D. and A. McGrew (eds.) Governing Globalization, Power, Authority and Global Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press), 1–24.Google Scholar
  30. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations. Politics Economics and Culture (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  31. Hill, C. (2003) The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  32. Houghton, D. (2007) ‘Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 3, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hudson, V. M. (2005) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hudson, V. M. (2007) Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory (New York: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
  35. Hudson, V. M. (2010) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Origins (1954–93) and Contestations’, in Denemark, R. A. (ed.) The International Studies Encyclopedia (New York: Blackwell), 2384–2409.Google Scholar
  36. Justaert, A. and Keukeleire, S. (2012) ‘Informal Governance and Networks in EU Foreign Policy’, in Christiansen, T. and C. Neuhold (eds.) International Handbook on Informal Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 558–590.Google Scholar
  37. Kayaoglu, T. (2010) ‘Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theories’, International Studies Review, 12, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelstrup, M. and Williams, M. C. (2000) ‘Introduction: Integration and the Politics of Community in the New Europe’, in Kelstrup, M. and M. C. Williams (eds.) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. Power, Security and Community (London: Routledge), 1–13.Google Scholar
  39. Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. (1977) Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown and Company).Google Scholar
  40. Keukeleire, S. (2014) ‘Lessons for the Practice and Analysis of EU Diplomacy from an “Outside–In” Perspective’, in Gstöhl, S. and E. Lannon (eds.) The Neighbours of the European Union’s Neighbours: Diplomatic and Geopolitical Dimensions beyond the European Neighbourhood Policy (Farnham: Ashgate), 227–241.Google Scholar
  41. Keukeleire, S. and Delreux, T. (2014) The Foreign Policy of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  42. Keukeleire, S. and Hooijmaaijers, B. (2014) ‘The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organisations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism’, Journal of Common Market Studies, DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12102.Google Scholar
  43. Keukeleire, S., Justaert, A., and Thiers. R. (2009) ‘Reappraising Diplomacy: Structural Diplomacy and the Case of the European Union’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keukeleire, S. and Schunz S. (2008) Foreign Policy, Globalization and Global Governance: The European Union’s Structural Foreign Policy. Paper presented at the Fourth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics of the ECPR Standing Group on the European Union. Riga.Google Scholar
  45. Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2002) ‘Mapping Global Governance’, in Held, D. and A. McGrew (eds.) Governing Globalization, Power, Authority and Global Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press), 46–69.Google Scholar
  46. Krasner, S. D. (1985) Structural Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  47. McGrew, A. (2004) ‘Power Shift: From National Government to Global Governance?’ in Held, D. (ed.) A Globalizing World: Culture, Economics, Politics (London: Routledge), 127–168.Google Scholar
  48. Mittelman, J. H. (1997) Globalization: Critical Reflections (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  49. Muldoon, J. P. (2005) ‘Introduction’, in Muldoon, J. P., J. F. Aviel, R. Reitano, and E. Sullivan (eds.) Multilateral Diplomacy and the United Nations Today (Boulder: Westview Press), 1–12.Google Scholar
  50. Neack, L. (2008) The New Foreign Policy: Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. New Millennium Books in International Studies (Boulder/New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).Google Scholar
  51. Neack, L. J., Hey, A. K., and Haney, P. J. (1995) Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  52. Nelson, J. M. (2000) The Business of Peace: Business as a Partner in Conflict Resolution. (London: International Alert — Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum).Google Scholar
  53. Offe, C. (2009) ‘Governance: An “Empty Signifier”?’ Constellations, 16, 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ordeix-Rigo, E. and Durante, J. (2009) ‘From Public Diplomacy to Corporate Diplomacy: Increasing Corporation’s Legitimacy and Influence’, American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Overbeek, H. (2010) ‘Global Governance: From Radical Transformation to NeoLiberal Management’, International Studies Review, 12, 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pierre, J. and Guy B. P. (2000) Governance, Politics and State (New York: St. Martin’s).Google Scholar
  57. Putnam, R. D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization, 42, 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Buckingham: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  59. Risse, T. (2013) ‘Foreign Policy Analysis and the Governance Turn’, in Bynander, F. and S. Guzzini (eds.) Rethinking Foreign Policy (London: Routledge), 176–185.Google Scholar
  60. Rosenau, J. N. (1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity Google Scholar
  61. Rittberger, V. (2001) German Foreign Policy since Unification. Theories and Case Studies (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  62. Rosenau, J. N. (1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  63. Rosenau, J. N. (1995) ‘Governance in the Twenty-First Century’, Global Governance, 1, 13–43.Google Scholar
  64. Rosenau, J. N. (2002) ‘Governance in a New Global Order’, in Held, D. and A. McGrew (eds.) Governing Globalization, Power, Authority and Global Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press), 70–86.Google Scholar
  65. Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O. (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruggie, J. G. (1975) ‘International Responses to Technology — Concepts and Trends’, International Organization, 29, 557–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scholte, J. A. (2005) Globalization: A Critical Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  68. Scholte, J. A. (2010) ‘Civil Society in Multi-Level Governance’, in Enderlein, H., S. Wälti, and M. Zürn (eds.) Handbook on Multi-Level Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 383–398.Google Scholar
  69. Schunz, S. and Bruyninckx, H. (2011) The Democratic Legitimacy of the Contemporary Global Climate Governance Architecture (Leuven: Centre for Global Governance Studies).Google Scholar
  70. Smith, S. and Clarke M. (1985) Foreign Policy Implementation (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  71. Smith, S., Hadfield, A., and Dunne T. (2008) Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  72. Smouts, M.-C. (1998) ‘The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations’, International Social Science, 50, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sprout, H. and Sprout M. (1956) Man–Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  74. Strange, S. (1994) States and Markets (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  75. Tickner, A. B. (2003) ‘Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32, 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tickner, A. B. and Blaney, D. L. (eds.) (2012) Thinking International Relations Differently (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  77. Trigg, R. (1991) Understanding Social Science: A Philosophical Introduction to the Social Sciences (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  78. Van der Heiden, N. (2011) ‘A Multi-Level Governance Analysis of Urban Foreign Policy: The Role of the EU in City-to-City Cooperation’, in Reynaert, H., K. Steyvers, and E. V. Bever (eds.) The Road to Europe: Main Street or Backward Alley for Local Governments in Europe? (Brugge: Vanden Broele), 189–210.Google Scholar
  79. Vogel, D. and Swinnen, J. (eds.) (2011) Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation. The Shifting Roles of the EU, the US and California (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  80. Webber, M. and Smith, M. (eds.) (2002) Foreign Policy in a Transformed World (London: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  81. Weiss, T. G. (2000) ‘Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges’, Third World Quarterly, 21, 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weiss, T. G. and Thakur, R. (2010) The UN and Global Governance: An Unfinished Journey (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  83. Zürn, M. (2010) ‘Global Governance as Multi-Level Governance’, in Enderlein, H., S. Wälti, and M. Zürn (eds.) Handbook on Multi-Level Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 80–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stephan Keukeleire and Simon Schunz 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Keukeleire
  • Simon Schunz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations