Skip to main content

Abstract

This research centers on technology entrepreneurship, a narrow subset of numerous academic regimes that additionally incorporates interdisciplinary elements spanning many fields of social science. At the microlevel—the level of the individual actors and the ventures that they launch—are theoretical foundations in management science, specifically entrepreneurship, management of technology and innovation, organizational behavior and development, and narrower disciplines operative within and adjunct to those fields: engineering management, information systems, network dynamics, leadership, decision science and game theory. These microcomponents operate at the meso- and macrolevels within and against an environmental backdrop of academic theory in social evolution and economics, including political economics, econometrics and evolutionary economics, all of which interplay within the overarching realm of institutional sociology. At the nexus of these academic fields emerges the theoretical construct of endogenous economic growth driven by endogenous technological change—a complex sociotechnical-economic phenomenon that is at once the province and the impact of technology entrepreneurship—the platform, fulcrum and lever whereby seminal entrepreneurial actors conceive and implement new business ventures to create economic opportunities and revise the pathways of economic control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation Technology Review, 80(7), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation Management; Strategies, Implementation, and Profits. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Ed. (1995). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Business Hall of Fame, ANBHF (2004). Mary Kay Ash — Mary Kay Cosmetics. Retrieved July 26, 2010, from http://www.anbhf.org/pdf/mkash.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., & Thompson, P. (2007). Does it pay to be a jack of all trades? Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In Jonassen, D.H., & Land, S.M. (Eds.). Theoretical Foundations of Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnsley, M. (1993). Fractals Everywhere (2nd Ed). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Diversity Management, Creativity and Innovation, 14(2), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltran, L. (2002, July 22). WorldCom files largest bankruptcy ever. CNN/Money. Retrieved January 20, 2008, from http://money.cnn.com/2002/07/19/news/worldcom_bankruptcy/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, L. (2010, January). Robert Noyce, Silicon Valley, and the teamwork behind the high-technology revolution. Organization of American Historians — OAH Magazine of History, 24(1), 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilstein, R. (1995). On gas turbines, nuclear physics, and Mr. Birdseye. National Forum, 75(4), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1978). Ecodynamics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1981). Evolutionary Economics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1991). What is evolutionary economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, J. (1996). Co-opetiton. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général traduit de l’anglois. Londres: Gyles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1992). An integrative framework of strategic decision making paradigms and their empirical validity: The case for strategic or active incrementalism and the import of tacit technological learning (RPI School of Management Working Paper Series No. 131). Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1993). Incrementalisme Strategique. Le Progrès Technique, 93(2), i-vi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1994a, June 27–29). A multi-national, resource-based view of training and development and the strategic management of technological learning: Keys for social and corporate survival and success. Paper presented at 39 International Council of Small Business Annual World Conference, Strasbourg, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1994b). The strategic management of technological learning: Transnational decision-making frameworks and their empirical effectiveness Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(11), p. 35–64 (UMI No. 9511131).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1994c). Gestion Strategique de l’Acquisition des Savoir-Faire. Le Progrès Technique, 94(1), 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1998). Higher order technological learning as determinant of market success in the multimedia arena;a success story, a failure, and a question mark: Agfa/Bayer AG, Enable Software, and Sun Microsystems. Technovation, 18(10), 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1999a). Knowledge transfer through technological hyperlearning in five industries. Technovation, 19(3), 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1999b). Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management. Technovation, 19(4), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2000a). Investigation and validation of technological learning versus market performance. Technovation, 20(7), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2000b). The Strategic Management of Technological Learning. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (1998–2014). Lectures in numerous courses covering topics on technology, innovation, entrepreneurship, business venturing, and project management. Unpublished lecture notes, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2001). The strategic management of technological learning: Learning to learn-how-to-learn in high tech firms and its impact on the strategic management of knowledge, innovation and creativity within and across firms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2002–2009). Doctoral seminar in the Management of Science, Technology and Innovation (MSTI). Unpublished lecture notes, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2004). Measuring intangibles: Managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation. International Journal of Nuclear Knowledge Management, 1(1/2), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2008a). Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage: Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization. Industry and Higher Education, 22(6), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2008b). Conceptual framework for an analysis of diversity and heterogeneity in the knowledge economy and society. In E.G. Carayannis, A. Kaloudis, & Å Mariussen (Eds.), Diversity in the Knowledge Economy and Society: Heterogeneity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Ch. 5, pp. 95–116). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. (2009). Firm evolution dynamics: Towards sustainable entrepreneurship and robust competitiveness in the knowledge economy and society. (International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Alexander, J. (1999). Winning by co-opeting in strategic government-university-industry (GUI) partnerships: The power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2/3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Alexander, J. (2002). Is technological learning a firm core competence; when, how, and why: A longitudinal, multi-industry study of firm technological learning and market performance. Technovation, 22(10), 625–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Alexander, J. (2004). Strategy, structure and performance issues of pre-competitive R&D consortia: Insights and lessons learned from SEMATECH. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 51(2): 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (Eds.). (2006). Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters: A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Campbell, D.F.J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Chanaron, J.-J., (Eds.). (2007). Leading and Managing Creators, Inventors, and Innovators: The Art, Science, and Craft of Fostering Creativity, Triggering Invention, and Catalyzing Innovation. Westport, CT: Quorum/Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., Evans, D., & Hanson, M. (2003). A cross-cultural learning strategy for entrepreneurship education: Outline of key concepts and lessons learned from a comparative study of entrepreneurship students in France and the US. Technovation, 23(9): 757–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Formica, P. (Eds.). (2008). Knowledge Matters: Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., S Gonzalez, E. (2003). Creativity and innovation = competitiveness? When, how, and why. In Larisa V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook on Innovation (Part VIII, Ch. 3, pp. 587–606). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Juneau, T. (2003). Idea Makers and Idea Brokers in High-Technology Entrepreneurship: Fee vs. Equity Compensation for Intellectual Venture Capitalists. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., Popescu, D., Sipp, C.M., & Stewart, M.R. (2006). Technological learning for entrepreneurial development (TL4ED) in the knowledge economy (KE): Case studies and lessons learned. Technovation, 26(4), 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., S Sipp, C.M. (2006), e-Development Towards the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for smart Development. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., S Stewart, M.R. (2007–2011). Numerous Courses Covering Topics on Technology, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Business Venturing, Information Systems, and Project Management. Unpublished lecture notes, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G. & Stewart, M.R. (2011). The Story of Obsessed Maniacs and Clairvoyant Oracles: Learning from Entrepreneurs and their Creations. Manuscript in preparation, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., S von Zedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting gloCal (globallocal), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: Lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25(2), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., & Ziemnowicz, C. (2007). Rediscovering Schumpeter: Creative Destruction Evolving into “Mode 3”. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., Ziemnowicz, C., & Spillan, J.E. (2007). Economics and Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of creative destruction: Definition of terms. In E.G. Carayannis & C. Ziemnowicz (Eds.). Re-discovering Schumpeter: Creative Destruction Evolving into “Mode 3” (pp. 23–45). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général traduit de l’anglois. Londres: Gyles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In: D. Steinberg, S L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics in Generative Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, P.J. (1991). A clean and separate space: Walt Disney in person and production. Journal of Popular Culture, 25(3), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currid, C. (1992, November 30). The man who built Compaq applies his skills to IS management. InfoWorld, 14(48), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What they Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. (1984). Strategy of Decision. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk, G.J., & Kruger, S. (n.d.). The driving force behind entrepreneurship: An exploratory perspective. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.kmu.unisg.ch/rencontres/band2002/F_04_deKlerk.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • des Bruslons, J.S. (1723). Dictionnaire universel de commerce. Paris: France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1999). Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle, D.T. (2005, February). Ultimate wealth builders — Madame C.J. Walker: Breaking new ground. Black Enterprise, 35(7), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer, K. (1994). Kenneth Boulding: A founder of evolutionary economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 28(4), 1201–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (1991). Technology, learning, technology strategy and competitive pressures. British Journal of Management, 2(3), 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter (1986). The changed world economy. Foreign Affairs (Spring), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espedal, B. (2008). In the pursuit of understanding how to balance lower and higher order learning in organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(3), 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G. (2005, July 14). Ebbers gets 25 years for fraud at WorldCom. USA Today, p. 1B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltham, C. (2004). Problems are us: Or is it just me? Suffolk, UK: Braiswick. Retrieved February 27, 2010, from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2DVbpvid56wC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=dystechnia&ots=qjXjCIURMF&sig= U4pDzcGPK-CSGfo6reTDlGmO2Hk#v=onepage&q=dystechnia&f=false.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R.L., & Kenney, M. (1990). The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America’s Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. (1999). ‘New paradigm’ or New World Order? The Return of Classical Imperialism and the Dynamics of the US Boom. Working paper of the International Working Group on Value Theory. University of Greenwich, London, UK. Retrieved February 27, 2010, from http://www.iwgvt.org/files/00freeman.rtf

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, K. (2010). Mary Kay Cosmetics. In The Handbook of Texas Online. Retrieved July 26, 2010, from Texas State Historical Association Website http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/dhm01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follette, G. (2004, November). The formative years: Frozen foods. ASHRAE Journal, 46(11), S35–S41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R.L. (1991). Alternating Currents: Nationalized Power in France, 1946–1970. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., & Metcalfe, S. (Eds.). (2001). Frontiers of Evolutionary Economics: Competition, Self-organization and Innovation Policy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galagan, P.A. (1991). Tapping the power of a diverse work force. Training and Development Journal, 45(3), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Rappa, M.A. (1994). A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5(3), 344–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by inter-temporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, R. (2004, May 17). He built a better mouse. Business Week, (3883), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, E. (2005, July 11). Truth & punishment. Telephony, 246(14), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D.F. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends on where you look. American Psychologist, 44(8), 1156–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.H. (1932). Institution. In E. R. A. Seligman & A. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences 8 (pp. 84–89).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hodgson (Ed.) (1993) Economics of Institutions. The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 33. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn? In P.C. Nystrom & W.H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design (pp. 8–27). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, R.F. & Link, A.N. (1982). The Entrepreneur. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, B., & Lubar, S.D. (1986). Engines of Change: The American Industrial Revolution, 1790–1860. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honan, P. (1989, July). The power brokers: Stepping out from IBM’s shadow—Rod Canion. Personal Computing, 12(7), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoselitz, B.F. (1960). Sociological Aspects of Economic Growth. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E.S., & Murray, J.M. (1999). A History of Business in Medieval Europe, 1200–1550. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A.M. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G.G., & Wadhwani, D. (2006). Schumpeter’s Plea: Rediscovering History and Relevance in the Study of Entrepreneurship (HBS Working Paper Number 06–036). Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, L., & Lambert, R. (1998, March 6). That creepy feeling: FT Interview Andy Grove: The chairman and chief executive of Intel, the world’s biggest chipmaker, talks to Louise Kehoe and Richard Lambert about the dangers of “missing a turn” [London edition]. Financial Times, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, J. (2002, October). Innovators hall of fame. Fortune Small Business, 12(8), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmann, R.H., Saxton, M.J., & Serpa, R. (1985). Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S.J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.). The Positive-Sum Strategy (pp. 275–305). Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, W. (1983). The meaning of entrepreneurship. American Journal of Small Business, 8(2), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, M. (1985). An investigator’s guide to work place culture. In P. Frost, L. Moore, M. Louis, C. Lundberg & J. Martin (Eds) Organisational Culture, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. 1982. Phases of Capitalist Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.A., (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, L. (1998). Chapter 1, Shared visions: European and American interests in education and training for an innovative work force — A synthesis of conference themes and papers. New Visions: Education and Training for an Innovative Workforce (National Center for Research in Vocational Education MDS-1073, University of California at Berkeley). Retrieved February 23, 2010, from http://ncrve.berkeley.edu/Abstracts/MDS-1073/MDS-1073-CHAPTER.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S.N. (2002, March 4). Worldcom’s bad trip. Fortune, 145(5), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J.B. (2006). Organizational Behavior 2. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1989). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review 65(4), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, E. (1999, November). The geek elite. Fortune, 140(9), 220–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1988). Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese Firms. California Management Review, 30(3), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance: Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler III, E.E. (2002). When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review, 44(4), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Oxford English Dictionary (1933). First edition, J.A.H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Pink Producers (1981). Who is Mary Kay Ash? Retrieved July 26, 2010, from http://pinkproducers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Who-is-Mary-Kay-Ash.pdf

  • Polanyi, K. (1966). Dahomey and the Slave Trade: An Analysis of an Archaic Economy. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, E. (2008, October). A man for his people. Mechanical Engineering, 130 (10), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, A. (1989). Technology Transfer: A Taxonomic View. Journal of Technology Transfer, Summer-Fall, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-cultural Approach (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, S.J. & Reilly, E.D. (2000). Encyclopedia of Computer Science (4th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5/2), S71–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routti, J. (2003, June 2). Research and Innovation in Finland — Transformation into a Knowledge Economy. In Competitiveness and the Knowledge Economy Research and Innovation Strategies: Cases of Chile and Finland. Paper presented at the Inter- American Development Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, D. (2007, February 3–9). Black history reveals pioneering entrepreneurs. Afro- American Red Star, 115( 25), A6–A7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahal, D. (1981). Patterns of Technological Innovation. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Say, J.B. (1836). A Treatise on Political Economy; or the Production, Distribution, and Consumption of Wealth (C.R. Prinsep & C.C. Biddle, Trans.). Philadelphia: Grigg & Elliot. (Original work published 1803.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermerhorn, J.R. Jr., Hunt, J.G., & Osbourn, R.N. (1982). Organizational Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickel, R. (1998, December 7). Walt Disney: Ruler of the Magic Kingdom. Time, 152(23), 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1911/1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (R. Opie, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1912.) (Reprinted Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1983.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. (5th ed. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Secret of Wal-Mart’s Success. (1992, July). Money, 21(7), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. Roth, G., & Smith, B. (1999). The Dance of Change. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, OH: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49(3), 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1969). Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipp, C.M. (2011). Why, when and how are real options used in strategic technology venturing? Dissertation manuscript in preparation, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solymossy, E. (1998). Entrepreneurial dimensions: The relationship of individual, venture, and environmental factors to success. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(05), 1667 (UMI No. 9833914).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., & Frensch, P.A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M.R. (2011). Technology entrepreneurship: A deliberation on success and failure in technology venturing toward a grounded theory of dystechnia. Dissertation manuscript, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. 1995. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. San Fransico: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Schuen, A. (1992). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Mimeo, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodhosi, A.S. (2000). May the worst man win. Strategy & Leadership, 28(3), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. & Donsky, M. (1990, June). Selling, rather than sitting. Southern Living, 25(6), 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. and Fleischer, M. (1990). The Process of Technology Innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turn the telescope within. (2002, December 9). Chennai, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, V. (2001, May/June). A’Lelia Bundles on the legacy of Madame C.J. Walker. The New Crisis, 108(3), 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt University (2010). Fractals and the Fractal Dimension. Retrieved January 14, 2011, from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/psychology/cogsci/chaos/workshop/Fractals.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Braun, C. (1997). The Innovation War. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Seggern, D. (2007). CRC Standard Curves and Surfaces with Mathematics (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warsh, D. (2006). Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations: A Story of Economic Discovery. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. (1997, December 2). Westinghouse name passes into history. Financial Times [London Edition], 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K.E.M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations (A.M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal, 68(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, K. (1993). Knowledge Management Foundation. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J.S. (1972). Leaders in marketing: Henry G. Parks, Jr. Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 70–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesterday’s Man. (2002, May 4). Economist, 363(8271), 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R. & Holbek, J. (1973), Innovations and Organizations, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarley, C. (1997, November 16). Rod Canion. Computer Reseller News, (763), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, W. (2004, August 9). Sam Walton: King of the discounters. Business Week, (3895), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S.B. Bacharach (Ed.). Research in the Sociology of Organizations [Vol. 2]. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Elias G. Carayannis and McDonald R. Stewart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carayannis, E.G., Stewart, M.R. (2014). Theory and Literature. In: Entrepreneurial Profiles of Creative Destruction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429834_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics