Advertisement

Social Suicide: A Digital Context for Self-Harm and Suicidal Ideation

  • Tamasine Preece
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

In August 2013 a British teenager’s death by suicide was claimed by the girl’s grieving father and the international media as a direct consequence of cyberbullying via social media. The platform for the alleged abuse was a Q&A forum Ask.fm, which facilitates the asking and answering of questions from known and anonymous contacts, in addition to generic questions posed by the site administrators. In the days following her death, the girl’s father opened a petition calling for the government to develop stricter regulation of social media forums, and statements were issued by the chief executive of the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) and the Department of Education (DfE), condemning the perpetrators of what was perceived to be cyberbullying. Within days of the girl’s suicide, however, representatives of Ask.fm publicly stated that 98 per cent of the bullying messages originated from a computer with the same internet provider (IP) address as that of the deceased. In the inquest that followed, the coroner ruled that the evidence indicated that this was indeed the case; the 15-year-old girl had trolled her own Ask.fm profile page before taking her own life.

Keywords

Young People Suicidal Ideation Eating Disorder Focus Group Participant Public Realm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Bond (2014) Childhood, Mobile Technologies and Everyday Experiences: Changing Technologies — Changing Childhoods? (London: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. d. boyd (2014) Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. (Berkeley: University of California).Google Scholar
  3. d. boyd (2010) Digital Self-Harm and Other Acts of Self-Harassment [Online] 7 December. Available at: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/12/07/digital-self-harm-and-other-acts-of-self-harassment.html; last accessed 25 July 2014.Google Scholar
  4. d. boyd, J. Ryan and A. Leavett (2011) ‘Pro-self-harm and the visibility of youth-generated problematic material’, I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 7 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  5. Childline (2014) http://www.childline.org.uk/Explore/Bullying/Pages/online-bullying.aspx, 25 July 2014.
  6. V. Donoso, K. Olafson and T. Broddason (2009) What We Know, What We Do Not Know. (London: London School of Economics and Political Science). EU Kids Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Englander (2012) Digital Self-Harm: Frequency, Type, Motivations and Outcomes (Bridgewater, MA: Massachussets Agression Centre).Google Scholar
  8. L. Farrugia (2014) Awareness of Bullying and Harassment: The Meaning of Online Problematic Situations for Children: Results of Qualitative Cross-Cultural Investigation in Nine European Countries. (London: London School of Economics and Political Science). EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
  9. N. Funnell (2013) Digital Self-harm: Teens Tap out an Online Cry for Help [Online] Available at: http://www.ninafunnell.com/digital-self-harm-teens-tap-out-an-online-cry-for-help/; last accessed 31 July 2014.Google Scholar
  10. R. Hale (2008) ‘Psychoanalysis and suicide; Process and typology’ In S. Briggs, A. Lemma and W. Crouch (Eds), Relating to Self-Harm and Suicide: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Theory, Practice and Prevention. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  11. M. Klein (1946) ‘Notes on some schizoid mechanisms’, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27: 99–110.Google Scholar
  12. J. Lacan (1978) Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. (London, NY: W.W. Norton and Co).Google Scholar
  13. S. Livingstone and L. Haddon (Eds) (2009) Kids Online: Opportunities and Risks for Children. (Bristol: The Policy Press).Google Scholar
  14. J. T. Maltsberger and D. H. Buie (1980) ‘The devices of suicide: Revenge, riddance and rebirth’, International Review of Psychoanalysis, 7: 61–72.Google Scholar
  15. Massachusetts Aggression Reduction Centre (2012) Digital Self-Harm: Frequency, Type, Motivations and Outcomes. Available at: https://webhost.bridgew.edu/marc/DIGITAL%20SELF%20HARM%20report.pdf; last accessed 11 May 2014.Google Scholar
  16. G. Stald and L. Haddon (2008) Cross-Cultural Contexts of Research: Factors Influencing the Study of Children and the Internet in Europe. (London: London School of Economics and Political Science). EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
  17. G. Stald and L. Haddon (2009) Cultures of Research and Policy in Europe. (London: London School of Economics and Political Science). EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
  18. J. Ulnik (2008) Skin in Psychoanalysis. (London: Karnac).Google Scholar
  19. G. Valentine and S. L. Holloway (2002) ‘Cyberkids? Exploring Children’s Identities and Social Networks in On-line and Off-line Worlds’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92: 302–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tamasine Preece 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamasine Preece

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations