Abstract
Chapter 2 outlines the attempts to define the legitimate use and limits of power in industry that were made in the context of the Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations (the Donovan Commission). It contrasts two different approaches to industrial relations institutionalism arising from different conceptions of the public interest, arguing that these conceptions were never properly distinguished in the debate. The chapter shows how the apparent consensus that voluntarist industrial relations based on free collective bargaining was the best policy for industrial relations was built on pragmatism rather than theory or principle. Notably, the chapter argues that the labour movement’s inability to resolve important ambiguities in its position was due to the need to accommodate internal disagreements about the nature of the capitalist economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Conor Cradden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cradden, C. (2014). Institutionalist Pluralism and Public Policy. In: Neoliberal Industrial Relations Policy in the UK: How the Labour Movement Lost the Argument. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413819_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413819_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49004-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41381-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)