Skip to main content

The Impact of Deregulation and Re-regulation on Bank Efficiency: Evidence from Asia

  • Chapter

Abstract

The post-crisis reform period in Asia has been characterized by an emphasis on the prudential regulation of banks, concomitant with an increased liberalization of the banking systems. More specifically while large-scale bank restructuring programmes and tighter prudential rules were put in place in those countries most affected by the 1997 crisis (e.g., Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines), other countries, such as China, India and Vietnam, saw an acceleration of financial liberalization over the same time period. This process resulted in substantial changes in market structure, deriving both from greater foreign presence and from increased privatization across the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altunbas, Y. and P. Molyneux (1996) ‘Economies of scale and scope in European banking’, Applied Financial Economics, 6(4), 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., H. Chang and S.Y. Lee (2010) ‘Differential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 1450–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R., G. Caprio and R. Levine (2001) ‘The regulation and supervision of banks around the world: A new database’, Vol. 2588, World Bank, free PDF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J.R., G. Caprio and R. Levine (2004) ‘Bank supervision and regulation: What works best?’ Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 205–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R., G. Caprio and R. Levine (2006) Rethinking Bank Regulation: Till Angels Govern, New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R., G. Caprio and R. Levine (2007) ‘Bank regulation and supervision (updated dataset)’, WB Working Paper series no. 2588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli (1995) ‘A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data’, Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E., and D.S.P. Rao (2002) ‘Technology gap, efficiency and a stochastic metafrontier function’, International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G.E., D.S.P. Rao and C.J. O’Donnell (2004) ‘A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. W., A.N. Berger, G.D. Ferrier and D.B. Humphrey (1993) ‘Efficiency and productivity growth in US banking’, in Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt (eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford University Press, 386–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., K.A. Demirgüc, and R. Levine (2006) ‘Bank supervision and corruption in lending’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 53, 2131–2163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S.A. (1992) ‘Mergers, efficiency and productivity growth in banking: The norwegian experience 1984–1990’, Working Paper, Norges Bank, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., and D.B. Humphrey, (1997) ‘Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research’, European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. and L.J. Mester (2001) ‘Explaining the dramatic changes in performance of U.S. banks: Technological change, deregulation and dynamic changes in competition,’ Centre for Financial Institutions Working Papers 01–22, Wharton School Centre for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikker, J. (2002) ‘Efficiency and cost differences across countries in a unified European banking market’, Dutch National Bank Staff Reports, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, R.R. and M.J. Flannery (2002) ‘Market discipline in the governance of U.S. bank holding companies: Monitoring versus influence’, European Finance Review, 6, 419–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casu B., Ferrari A. and T Zhao, (2013): ‘Regulatory reform and productivity change in Indian banking’ Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 1066–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetorelli, N. and M. Gambera (2001) ‘Banking market structure, financial dependence and growth: International evidence from industry data’, The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 617–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffai, M.E., M. Dietsch and A. Loxano-Vivas (2001) ‘Technological and environmental differences in the European banking industries’, Journal of Financial Services, Research 19(2/3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., M. Skully and K. Brown (2005) ‘Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras: 1993–2000’, China Economic Review, 16, 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chortareas, G., C. Girardone and A. Ventouri (2012) ‘Bank supervision, regulation and efficiency: Evidence from the European union’, Journal of Financial Stability, 8(4), 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S. and L. Laeven (2004) ‘What drives bank competition? Some international evidence’, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, M. D., P. Molyneux and F. Pasiouras (2011) ‘Regulations and productivity growth in banking; evidence from transition economies’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., L. Laeven and R. Levine (2003) ‘Regulations, market structure, institutions, and the cost of financial intermediation’, NBER Working Paper no. 9890, August.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dietsch, M. and A. Lozano-Vivas (2000) ‘How the environment determines banking efficiency: A comparison between French and Spanish industries’, Journal of Banking & Finance 24: 985–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1981) ‘Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals’, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 9, 139–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani (1986) ‘Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy’, Statistical Science, 1, 54–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E. and S.M. Mahdian (1995) ‘The comparative efficiency performance of small and large US commercial banks in the pre- and post-deregulation eras’, Allied Economics, 27, 1069–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R.A. and P.W. Wilson (1998) ‘Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks’, Journal of Economics & Business, 50, 155–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, G. and A. Winton (2000) ‘Liquidity provision, bank capital, and the macroeconomy’, Bank Capital, and the Macroeconomy (October 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, R., N. Rangan and R. Rezvanian (1993) ‘Organisational forms in banking: An empirical investigation of cost efficiency’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (2005) ‘Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model’, Journal of Econometrics, 26, 269–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, I. and K. Marton (2003) ‘Development and efficiency of the banking sector in a transitional economy: Hungarian experience’, Journal of Banking Finance, 27, 2249–2271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrylchyk, O. (2006) ‘Efficiency of the Polish banking industry: Foreign versus domestic banks’, Journal of banking & Finance, 30, 1975–1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haw, I. M., S.S.M Ho, B. Hu and D. Wu (2010) ‘Concentrated control, institutions, and banking sector; an international study’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, D. B. and L.B. Pulley (1997) ‘Banks’ responses to deregulation: Profits, technology and efficiency’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isik, I. and M.K. Hassan (2002) ‘Technical, scale and allocative efficiencies of Turkish Banking Industry’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 719–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, M. and Y. Tsutsui (2003) ‘Geographical segmentation in Japanese bank loan markets’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsomanoli, F. A., D. Margaritis and C. Staikouras (2009) ‘Efficiency and productivity growth in the banking industry of Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(3), 557–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. and C.A.K. Lovell (2003) Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S.C. and S. Sarkar (2003) ‘Deregulation, ownership, and productivity growth in the banking industry: Evidence from India’, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 35(3), 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1966) ‘Allocative efficiency vs. ‘X-Efficiency’, The American Economic Review, 56, 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leightner, J.E. and C.A.K. Lovell (1998) ‘The Impact of financial liberalisation on the performance of Thai banks’, Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. and J.O. Wilson (2010) ‘The profitability of banks in Japan’, Applied Financial Economics, 20(24), 1851–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J. (1996) ‘A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk-preferences’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 1025–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney C.Z. and R.D. Duval (1992) ‘Bootstrap inference: A preliminary Monte Carlo evaluation’, American Political Science Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasiouras, E, S. Tanna and C. Zopounidis (2009) ‘The impact of banking regulations on banks’ cost and profit efficiency; cross-country evidence’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 18, 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintyn, M. and M. Taylor (2002) ‘Regulatory and supervisory independence and financial stability’, International Monetary Fund working paper No. 02/46, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray S.C. (1982) ‘A translog cost function analysis of US agriculture, 1939–77’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey C. and J.T. Lindley (1977) ‘Inputs, outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions’, The Journal of Finance, 32, 1251–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny (1998) The Grabbing Hand; Government Pathologies and Their Cures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L. and T.P. Chang (2011) ‘A comprehensive analysis of the effects of risk measures on bank efficiency: Evidence from emerging Asian countries’ Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1727–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, A. (1996) ‘The design of financial systems: An overview’, Journal of Banking & Finance 20(5): 917–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thangavelu, S. M. and C. Findlay (2012) ‘Bank efficiency, regulation and response to crisis of financial institutions in selected Asian countries’, Real and Financial Integration in Asia, 2, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaim, O. (1995) ‘The effect of financial liberalisation on the efficiency of Turkish commercial banks’, Applied Financial Economics, 5, 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., B. Casu and A. Ferrari (2008) ‘Deregulation and productivity growth: A study of Indian commercial banking’, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 10(4), 318–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., B. Casu and A. Ferrari (2010) ‘The impact of regulatory reforms on cost structure, ownership and competition in Indian banking’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Bimei Deng, Barbara Casu and Alessandra Ferrari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deng, B., Casu, B., Ferrari, A. (2014). The Impact of Deregulation and Re-regulation on Bank Efficiency: Evidence from Asia. In: Lindblom, T., Sjögren, S., Willesson, M. (eds) Governance, Regulation and Bank Stability. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413543_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics