Trading on the Offshore: Territorialization and the Ocean Grab in the International Seabed

  • Anna Zalik
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

Property relations in oceans have a complex history, shaped in part by the deep seas’ distance from processes of territorialization on land. While the national marking of some coastal space through the largely accepted, if not universally ratified, premises of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) sets specific territorial extensions for states, the metaphorical and practical fluidity of oceans exemplify how their care is essentially an issue of global governance (Steinberg 2001). The oceans are the quintessential commons onto which contaminants and wastes can be externalized (Clapp 2002); the reduced social relations on those spaces distinguish them as a frontier zone, removed from terrestrial relations. The offshore, and particularly the ‘deep’ offshore, is isolated from human settlements. This places a physical limit on the capacity of external, and even internal, actors to observe and account for the rush to extraction there. Indeed, the marine zone offers spaces freer from public disruption and constant forms of social accountability than on land. As applied to finance, the term offshore refers to regions where state oversight and regulatory rules are attenuated (Hudson 2000, Cameron and Palan 2004).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bello, W., 2006. The Capitalist Conjuncture: Over-Accumulation, Financial Crises, and the Retreat from Globalization. Third World Quarterly, 27(8), 1345–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, L., 2005. Legal Spaces of Empire: Piracy and the Origins of Ocean Regionalism. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 47, 700–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bichler, S. and Nitzan, J., 2004. Dominant Capital and the New Wars. Journal of World Systems Research, 10(2), 255–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bina, C., 2013. A Prelude to the Foundation of Political Economy: Oil, War and Global Polity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boleslaw, A., 1984. Ideology and the Law of the Sea: The Challenge of the New International Economic Order. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 7(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, P., 2012. Emissions Trading, New Enclosures and Eco-social Contestation. Antipode, 44, 684–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borras, S. and Franco, J. C., 2011. Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, E. D., 2001. Sea-Bed Energy and Minerals: The International Legal Regime. Martinus Nijhoff/Brill, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Bunker, S. and Ciccantell, P. S., 2005. Globalization and the Race for Resources. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, A. and Palan, R., 2004. The Imagined Economies of Globalization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Clapp, J., 2002. Seeping through Regulatory Cracks. SAIS Review, 22(1), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coronil, F., 2000. Towards a Critique of Globalcentrism: Speculations on Capitalism’s Nature. Public Culture, 12(2), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coumans, C., 2011. Occupying Spaces Created by Conflict Anthropologists, Development NGOs, Responsible Investment, and Mining. Current Anthropology, 52(3), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowan, J. S., 2007. Is a War on Terror Possible: Lessons from the Long War Against Piracy. Queens Quarterly, 114(1), 73–85.Google Scholar
  15. Els, F. 2012. Nautilus Minerals plumbs new depths, comes up smelling of roses. Mining.com, September 12. http://www.mining.com/investors-like-what-nautilus-found-in-fresh-waters-15239/Google Scholar
  16. Ervine, K., 2007. The Greying of Green Governance: Power Politics and the Global Environmental Facility. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 18(4), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franckx, E., 2010. The International Seabed Authority and the Common Heritage of Mankind: The Need for States to Establish the Outer Limits of Their Continental Shelf. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 4, 543–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fridell, G., 2010. Fair Trade, Free Trade and the State. New Political Economy, 15(3), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster, J. and Clark, B., 2009. Ecological Imperialism: The Curse of Capitalism. Socialist Register, 40, 186–201.Google Scholar
  20. Gathii, J., 2010. The Use of Force Freedom of Commerce, and Double Standards in Prosecuting Pirates in Kenya. American University Law Review, 59, 101–139.Google Scholar
  21. Girvan, N., 1975. Economic Nationalism. Daedalus, 104(4), 145–158.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, T., 2010. Imperialist Canada. Winnipeg, Canada: Arbeiter Ring.Google Scholar
  23. Gramling, R. and Freudenburg, W. R. 2006. Attitudes toward Offshore Oil Development: A Summary of Current Evidence. Ocean & Coastal Management, 49(7), 442–461.Google Scholar
  24. Groves, S., 2012, The U.S. Can Mine the Deep Seabed Without Joining the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. Heritage Foundation, Washington, DC. December 4.Google Scholar
  25. Halpern, B. S., 2008. A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems. Science, 319, 948–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey, D., 2006/1982. The Limits of Capital. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Hope Thompson, M., 1980. The Third World and the Law of the Sea: The Attitude of the G77 toward the Continental Shelf. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 1(1), 37–70.Google Scholar
  28. Hudson, A., 2000. Offshoreness, Globalization and Sovereignty: A Postmodern Geo-political Economy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. International Seabed Authority (ISA), 2008. Polymetallic Sulphides, briefing paper, March.Google Scholar
  30. Jamasmie, C., 2012. Nautilus Dispute with Papua New Guinea to Delay or Even Cancel Underwater Mining Dreams. Mining.com [online]. [Accessed June 1].Google Scholar
  31. Kimball, L., 1987, Belgium—Canada—Italy—Netherlands—Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Agreement on the resolution of practical problems with respect to deepseabed Mining areas, and exchange of notes between the United States and Parties to the Agreement. International Legal Materials, 26(6), 1502–1515.Google Scholar
  32. Kirsch, S., 2008. Social Relations and the Green Critique of Capitalism in Melanesia. American Anthropologist, 110(3), 288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Labban, M., 2008. Space, Oil and Capital. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linebaugh, P. and Rediker, M., 2000. The Many Headed Hydra: Slaves, Sailors, Commoners and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lodge, M., 2009. Current Legal Developments, International Seabed Authority. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 24, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mansfield, B., 2004. Neoliberalism in the Oceans: ‘Rationalization’, Property Rights, and the Commons Question. Geoforum, 35, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Margulius, M. E. and Porter, T., 2013. Governing the Global Land Grab: Multipolarity, Ideas, and Complexity in Transnational Governance. Globalizations, 10(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McMichael, P., 2013. Land Grabbing as Security Mercantilism in International Relations. Globalizations, 10(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitchell, T., 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, J., 2012. Cheap Food & Bad Money: Food, Frontiers, and Financialization in the Rise and Demise of Neoliberalism, Review, 33(2–3), 225–261.Google Scholar
  41. Nitzan, J. and Bichler, S., 2009. Capital as Power. A Study of Order and Creorder. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Osuoka, I., 2009. Paying the Polluter? The Relegation of Local Community Concerns in ‘Carbon Credit’ Proposals of Oil Corporations in Nigeria. In: Bohm, S. and Dabhi, S., eds. Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: MayFly Books.Google Scholar
  43. Petras, J. and Veltmeyer, H., 2001. Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  44. Prashad, V. 2012. UNCTAD: The South Stands Up to the North. Third World Resurgence, 260(April), 9–12.Google Scholar
  45. Rediker, M., 1987. Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Merchant Seamen, Pirates and the Anglo-American Maritime World, 1700–1750. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Robles, A. 1996. Universality vs the Common Heritage of Humanity? The 1994 Agreement on Deep Seabed Mining. World Bulletin, 12, 20–70.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenbaum, H., 2011. Out of Our Depth: Mining the Ocean Floor in Papua New Guinea. Mining Watch Canada/Friends of the Earth Australia.Google Scholar
  48. Sadorsky, P., 2008. The Oil Price Exposure of Global Oil Companies. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 4, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sassen, S., 2013. Land Grabs Today: Feeding the Disassembling of National Territory. Globalizations, 10(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinberg, P., 1999. The Maritime Mystique: Sustainable Development, Capital Mobility, and Nostalgia in the World Ocean. Environment and Planning D, 17, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steinberg, P., 2001. The Social Construction of the Ocean, Vol. 78. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. UN Division of Oceans, 1998. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Historical Perspective. Originally prepared for the International Year of the Ocean. http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_his-torical_perspective.htmGoogle Scholar
  53. US Council on Foreign Relations, 2007. Report to Senate on the Convention on the Law of the Sea. 110th Congress, July 19, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  54. Van Harten, G., 2012. Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication: An Empirical Study of Investment Treaty Arbitration. Osgoode Hall Law School Research Paper Series, 41.Google Scholar
  55. Wallerstein, I., 1974. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16, 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wood, M., 1999. The International Seabed Authority: The First Four Years. Max Planck UNYB, 3, 173–240.Google Scholar
  57. Zalik, A., 2009. Zones of Exclusion: Offshore Extraction, the Contestation of Space and Physical Displacement in the Nigerian Delta and the Mexican Gulf. Antipode, 41(3), 557–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Anna Zalik 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Zalik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations