Abstract
This paper by Benu Schneider provides an excellent and elaborated discussion of the recent history and future prospects of sovereign debt restructuring mechanisms. It starts by summarizing the evolution of institutions and instruments to restructure sovereign debt and the changing role and views of the IMF. She then goes on to provide a broad and balanced view of the challenges and policy options in a sufficiently wide agenda. Having read before some of the reports on expert group meetings on the subject (for example, United Nations, 2012) I find this paper much more fair in terms of the directions of reform which I would prefer: those that require an architecture with much more statutory elements than the decentralized market-driven approach that has been favored until recently and after the demise of the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM) proposed by the IMF at the beginning of the past decade. Still, the conclusions of the paper go only half-way to accepting a strong move in this direction, when it is said that there are many steps and dimensions of improved mechanisms that can be undertaken so as to make voluntary arrangements workable and effective. I understand the balanced position taken in the paper but tend to disagree with such a view, although I must say that my reading is pretty much influenced by the case of Argentina and the recent developments in the US courts that I see as a demonstration of the limits to the non-statutory way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Heymann, D. (2008) “Macroeconomics of Broken Promises,” in R. Farmer (ed.), Macroeconomics in the Small and the Large: Essays on Microfoundations, Macroeconomic Applications and Economic History in Honor of Axel Leijonhufvud (London: Edward Elgar).
Noll, R. (1996) “The Complex Politics of Catastrophe Economics,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 12, pp. 141–6.
Porzecanski A. (2012) “Buenos Aires to Athens: The Road to Perdition,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, April. Available online at http://csis.org/files/publication/120403_Porzecanski_HemisFocus.pdf.
Reinhart C. (2008) “The Next (but not new) Frontier of Sovereign Default,” MPRA Paper No. 11865, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, April. Available online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11865/.
United Nations (2012) Report of a Panel Discussion on “Facilitating International Adjustment through Timely Debt Resolution,” Tokyo, October 12 2012, organised by the Financing for Development Office, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, UN and Centre for Governance and Innovation, Canada. Available online at http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/msc/externaldebt/2012Pd_Tokyo/Report.pdf.
Wyplosz C. (2011) “Debt Sustainability Assessment: Mission Impossible,” Review of Economics and Institutions, vol. 2, pp. 1–37.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Navajas, F. (2014). Commentary on “Sovereign Debt Restructuring: the Road Ahead” by Benu Schneider. In: Stiglitz, J.E., Heymann, D. (eds) Life After Debt. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137411488_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137411488_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41147-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41148-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)