Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
Pitiful Giants

Part of the book series: The Evolving American Presidency Series ((EAP))

  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

No one would accuse Teddy Roosevelt of a lack of ambition. Part of the charm and part of the hubris of his storied career were his unmitigated aspirations. So it came as somewhat of a surprise that in 1904, immediately upon his election to president in his own right, Roosevelt announced his intention to make his first full term, his last. While it is not entirely clear why TR made this decision, on this as in so many crucial decisions he kept his own counsel, it is probably the case that inasmuch as Roosevelt had served most of McKinley’s second term and because his critics had taken note of and criticized his aggressive ambition, TR decided to confound the opposition and unilaterally disarm. It was a decision Roosevelt would come to regret. Roosevelt expended much energy in the next four years choosing a worthy successor—an effort that apparently went to no avail. TR was so angry with President William Howard Taft that by the end of Taft’s first term, the two men hardly spoke. So frustrated was he with Taft’s performance and with his own absence from the limelight, Roosevelt took the extraordinary step in 1912 of running again for the presidency without even his party’s nomination. He lost, but he succeeded in beating Taft (by drawing off Republican votes) and electing Woodrow Wilson in the bargain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Wallace Earl Walker, “Presidential Transitions and the Entrepreneurial Presidency: Of Lions, Foxes, and Puppy Dogs,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 23 (1) (1993): 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Lane Crothers, “Asserting Dominance: Presidential Transitions from Out-Party to In-Party, 1932–1992,” Polity 26 (4) (1994): 793–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martha Kumar, “Getting Ready for Day One: Taking Advantage of the Opportunities and Minimizing the Hazards of a Presidential Transition,” Public Administration Review 68 (4) (2008): 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. For just a sampling of the business transition literature, see: Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld, The Hero’s Farewell: What Happens When CEOs Retire (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. William Ocasio, “Political Dynamics and the Circulation of Power: CEO Succession in U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960–1990,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2) (June 1, 1994): 285–312; “Institutionalized Action and Corporate Governance: The Reliance on Rules of CEO Succession,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2) (June 1, 1999): 384–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patricia Pitcher, Samia Chreim, and Veronika Kisfalvi, “CEO Succession Research: Methodological Bridges over Troubled Waters,” Strategic Management Journal 21(6) (June 1, 2000): 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei Shen and Albert A. Cannella Jr., “Revisiting the Performance Consequences of CEO Succession: The Impacts of Successor Type, Postsuccession Senior Executive Turnover, and Departing CEO Tenure,” The Academy of Management Journal 45(4) (August 1, 2002): 717–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. and Gary A. Ballinger and F. David Schoorman, “Individual Reactions to Leadership Succession in Workgroups,” The Academy of Management Review 32(1) (January 1, 2007): 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. For a selection of comparative studies, see Laurin L. Henry, Presidential transitions (Brookings Institution, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thad L. Beyle, “Gubernatorial Transitions: Lessons from the 1982–1983 Experience,” Publius 14 (3) (1984): 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. James S. Bowman, “State and Federal Executive Transitions: Sources and Resources,” Public Productivity Review 12 (1) (1988): 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harold F. Bass, “Comparing Presidential Party Leadership Transfers: Two Cases,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 23 (1) (1993): 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anthony J. Eksterowicz and Glenn Hastedt, “Modern Presidential Transitions: Problems, Pitfalls, and Lessons for Success,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 28 (2) (1998): 299–319.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen Hess, “First Impressions: A Look Back at Five Presidential Transitions,” The Brookings Review 19 (2) (2001): 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. John P. Burke, “Lessons from Past Presidential Transitions: Organization, Management, and Decision Making,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31 (1) (2001): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clay Johnson, “Recommendations for an Effective 2008 Transition,” Public Administration Review 68 (4) (2008): 624–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. For a good review of the legislative term limits literature, see Edward J. López, “Term Limits: Causes and Consequences,” Public Choice 114 (1/2) (2003): 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. or Christopher Z. Mooney, “Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship: A Review,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9(2) (July 1, 2009): 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. For the electoral effects of term limits at the state legislative level, see Jonathan S. Krasno and Donald Philip Green, “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections,” The Journal of Politics 50 (4) (1988): 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. and Seth E. Masket and Jeffrey B. Lewis, “A Return to Normalcy? Revisiting the Effects of Term Limits on Competitiveness and Spending in California Assembly Elections,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (1) (2007): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. These data for life expectancies from 1789 to 1900 were collected by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and are published in Tables 62 and 66 in Warren S. Thompson and P. K. Whelpton, Population Trends in the United States (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1933), p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Kenneth R. Mayer, “Executive Orders and Presidential Power,” The Journal of Politics 61 (2) (1999): 445–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. William G. Howell and Kenneth R. Mayer, “The Last One Hundred Days,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (3) (2005): 533–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frederick C. Mosher, “Presidential Transitions and Foreign Policy: The American Experience.” Public Administration Review 45 (4) (1985): 468–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vikki Gordon, “‘The Law’: Unilaterally Shaping U.S. National Security Policy: The Role of National Security Directives,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (2) (2007): 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurt M. Campbell and James B. Steinberg, Difficult Transitions: Foreign Policy Troubles at the Outset of Presidential Power (Brookings Institution Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Daniel P. Franklin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franklin, D.P. (2014). Introduction. In: Pitiful Giants. The Evolving American Presidency Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408242_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics