Abstract
Austen’s novels are neither vehicles for the articulation of contemporary debates about the political, economic and moral issues of property, land-ownership, the distribution of wealth, and labour, or anything else, nor channels for the broadcast of her own opinions about or interventions into those debates; they are novels. Nonetheless, as Eagleton points out, the experiments in fiction of Austen’s time had their roots in a period he refers to as one of ‘vision and anxiety’, in ‘new liberations of energy and new forms of repression’.1 Attention is paid to rural property, houses and land, and to the complex and changing ways in which these are owned and used. The semi-natural landscape may be valued above the Improved, and the country over the town, but the estate and the wider countryside are described in ways nostalgic or simplistic or reactionary only as a facet of characterisation. Descriptions by the narrative voices of the novels of rural scenes suggest an understanding of the politics of pastoral2 and of the relations of power inherent in relations of property.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Terry Eagleton, The English Novel: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), p. 95.
See Roger Sales, English Literature in History 1780–1830: Pastoral and Politics (1983); reprint (London: Hutchinson, 2007). Austen’s fiction has been described as ‘Tory pastoral’.
See Donald J. Greene, ‘Jane Austen and the Peerage’, in Ian Watt, ed., Jane Austen: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963), pp. 161–3.
See Mary Evans, Jane Austen and the State (London: Tavistock, 1987), pp. 18–42
David Lieberman, ‘Property, Commerce and the Common Law: Attitudes to Legal Change in the Eighteenth Century’, in John Brewer and Susan Staves, eds, Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), p. 145 (Skinner’s note).
See, for example, John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690); reprint, John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, ed. C.B. McPherson (Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1980), chapter V, ‘Of Property’, pp. 18–30.
Peter Knox-Shaw, Jane Austen and the Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 5.
David Hume, ‘Of National Characters’ (1742), in Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Eugene F. Miller (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1987), I: XXI, p. 1.
Raymond Williams, The Country and the City (Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 115.
Parrinder calls Mansfield an estate without land, suggesting that its wealth derives almost entirely from the sugar plantations, but there would appear to be at least some Bertram plantations in Northamptonshire, though these may refer to crops grown for domestic consumption, and Sir Thomas has property in the nearby village (he has given up the town house) and perhaps elsewhere. Patrick Parrinder, Nation and Novel: The English Novel from its Origins to the Present Day (Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 196.
Henry Austen, ‘Biographical Notice of the Author’, in Northanger Abbey and Persuasion (1818); reprint in Kathryn Sutherland, ed., A Memoir of Jane Austen and Other Family Recollections (Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 140–1.
David Daiches, ‘Jane Austen, Karl Marx and the Aristocratic Dance’, American Scholar 17 (Summer 1948), 289–96, 289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Sandie Byrne
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byrne, S. (2014). The Land and the Big House. In: Jane Austen’s Possessions and Dispossessions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137406316_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137406316_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48792-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40631-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)