Skip to main content

Ethnographic Imagination in the Field of the Prison

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

In this chapter, I propose that something about ethnographic practice itself can help us expand our understanding of what is possible for the ethnography of prisons. As other chapters in this volume attest, ethnographers of prisons face challenges specific to oppressive and secretive institutions (see particularly chapters 2 and 13). The extent and intensity of these challenges vary widely, but in many cases we encounter an inversion of the guiding premise of our craft, as the fundamentally relational quality of the ethnographic method encounters restriction, surveillance and suspicion. My aim here is to explore the territory that emerges from these pressures, such that the field site, or specific events within that site, cannot be grasped or comprehended entirely through standard ethnographic practices. By seeing ethnography as a specific perception of our surroundings — an apprehension of figure and ground — I suggest one way we might approach our collective imagination as prison ethnographers in creative and perhaps unexpected ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • I strongly recommend reading the whole of Avery Gordon’s Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination; the discussion of Barthes takes up only a few pages of this rich and inspiring work. For a useful look at note taking and its integration with every aspect of ethnographic research, see Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes by Robert M. Emerson, Rachel I. Fretz and Linda L. Shaw(University of Chicago Press, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

References

  • Bandyopadhyay, M. (2010) Everyday Life in a Prison: Confinement, Surveillance, Resistance (New Delhi: Orient Blackswan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1981) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography (trans. Howard, R.) (London: Fontanna).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (ed) (2008) ‘Imaginary Penalities and Risk-Crazed Governance’, Imaginary Penalities (Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartraine, G. and Sharon, D. (2007) ‘Public Secrets’, Vectors: Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular, 2, 2, http://vectors.usc.edu/issues/4/publicsecrets/Accessed 8 January 2014.

  • Darke, S. (2014) ‘Managing Without Guards in a Brazilian Lockup’, Focaal — Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 68, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (2005) ‘Barthes’s Punctum’, Critical Inquiry, 31, 3, 539–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1978–79) ‘Befindlichkeit: Heidegger and the Philosophy of Psychology’, Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 1–3, 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (1997) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. (2005) ‘Carceral Imaginations’, Carceral Notebooks, 1, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2007) ‘The Hidden Side of the Moon, or, “Lifting Out” in Ethnographies’, in A. McLean and A. Liebling (eds) The Shadow Side of Fieldwork: Exploring the Blurred Borders between Ethnography and Life (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2014) ‘Reasonable Caning and the Embrace of Human Rights in Ugandan Prisons’, Focaal — Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 68, 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2004) Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1977) On Photography (New York: Dell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, T. (1999) Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labor of the Negative (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. B. (2012) Hound Pound Narrative: Sexual Offender Habilitation and the Anthropology of Therapeutic Intervention (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waquant, L. (2002) ‘The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography’, Ethnography, 3, 4, 371–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Lorna A. Rhodes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rhodes, L.A. (2015). Ethnographic Imagination in the Field of the Prison. In: Drake, D.H., Earle, R., Sloan, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403889_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics