Advertisement

The Short Films of Wes Anderson

  • Nicole Richter

Abstract

Wes Anderson’s feature-length filmmaking has largely been met with critical acclaim, with widespread consensus among critics that, at the very least, Anderson is a modern-day auteur with a distinct directorial style.1 Critical studies of Anderson’s work range from large-authorship analyses, like Mark Browning’s 2011 book-length work, Wes Anderson: Why His Movies Matter, Tod Lippy’s “Wes Anderson,” or Devin Orgeron’s director study, to scholarship about more specific themes in Anderson’s filmmaking, such as Cynthia Felando’s work on women and aging, James MacDowell’s essay on tone and quirky sensibility, or Joshua Gooch’s discussion of fatherhood. While these works each have something important to offer readers, what is missing from the current scholarship surrounding Anderson is an analysis of his short films.

Keywords

Hotel Room Television Study Short Film Widespread Consensus Character Focus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Aisenberg, Joseph. “Wes’s World: Riding Wes Anderson’s Vision Limited.” Bright Lights Film Journal 59 (February 2008): n.p. Web.Google Scholar
  2. Baschiera, Stefano. “Nostalgically Man Dwells on This Earth: Objects and Domestic Space in The Royal Tenenbaums and The Darjeeling Ltd.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 10.1 (March 2012): 118–31. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks, James L. “Bottle Rocket.” Current, November 2008, n.p. Web.Google Scholar
  4. Browning, Mark. Wes Anderson: Why His Movies Matter. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
  5. Briitsch, Matthias. “The Art of Reduction: Notes on the Dramaturgy of the Short Fiction Film.” In Short: The Journal of Small Screen Studies 1 (2008): 1–9. Print.Google Scholar
  6. Buckland, Warren. “Wes Anderson: A ‘Smart’ Director of New Sincerity?” New Review of Film and Television Studies 10.1 (March 2012): 1–5. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, Jeremy. “Jean-Luc Godard: Audience Detachment through Narrative Delay.” Studies in Cinema, February 2010, n.p. Web.Google Scholar
  8. Felando, Cynthia. “A Certain Age: Wes Anderson, Anjelica Huston and Modern Femininity.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 10.1 (March 2012): 68–82. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godard, Jean-Luc. Godard on Godard: Critical Writings by Jean-Luc Godard. New York: Da Capo Press, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
  10. Gooch, Joshua. “Making a Go of It: Paternity and Prohibition in the Films of Wes Anderson.” Cinema Journal 47.1 (Autumn 2007): 26–48. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hancock, Brannon M. “A Community of Characters: The Narrative Self in the Films of Wes Anderson.” The Journal of Religion and Film 9.2 (October 2005): n.p. Web.Google Scholar
  12. Lippy, Tod. “Wes Anderson.” New York Film-makers on New York Film-making. London: Faber & Faber, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
  13. MacDowell, James. “Wes Anderson, Tone and the Quirky Sensibility.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 10.1 (March 2012): 6–27. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murray, Noel. “Wes Anderson.” The A. V. Club, December 2008, n.p. Web.Google Scholar
  15. Orgeron, Devin. “La Camera-Crayola: Authorship Comes of Age in the Cinema of Wes Anderson.” Cinema Journal 46.2 (Winter 2007): 40–65. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Susman, Gary. “Darjeeling Unlimited.” Boston Phoenix, October 2007, n.p. Web.Google Scholar
  17. Thomas, Deborah J. “Framing the Melancomic: Character, Aesthetics and Affect in Wes Anderson’s Rushmore.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 10.1 (March 2012): 97–117. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter C. Kunze 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Richter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations