Abstract
I will now apply the flight, support, and voice schema to two other secessionist conflicts: southern Thailand (Patani) and, in the next chapter, the southern Philippines. All three of my cases involve Southeast Asian Muslim communities with histories of statehood involved in ethnosecessionist rebellions against centralized states dominated by other ethnic majorities. Though similar, and thus comparable, the three cases also vary in several respects. While Aceh and Indonesia share a common faith, Patani and Mindanao feature Muslim minorities resisting non-Muslim majority states. And while GAM was relatively cohesive, rebels in the other cases have been fragmented. And while the Aceh conflict has been firmly resolved, the others face more ambiguous futures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2014 Shane Joshua Barter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barter, S.J. (2014). Comparisons, Patani. In: Civilian Strategy in Civil War. Politics, Economics, and Inclusive Development. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402998_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402998_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48686-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40299-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)