Methodological Twists and Theoretical Tools
This chapter outlines the theoretical and methodological tools that serve as a foundation for this book. In order to understand the claims and counterclaims contained in the different chapters of this book, I present here a necessary theoretical synopsis for the readers. Imagining Time and Space in Universities: Bodies in Motion presents critical theorizations of time and space, which question the access we have to different experiences of international movement. These theorizations reveal the inherently unstable nature of dominant discourses regarding trajectories and traveling. I argue that internationalization discourses produce certain institutional subjectivities and practices due to their implicit ideas about time and space embedded on their dominant definitions. These dimensions have been understood in separate and hierarchical modes, which mean that producing accounts of meaningful experiences with institutional progress necessitates the advancement of an understanding that sees space as a key element of the showing up of the world1 (Massey, 2005) and time as the succession of predictable pasts, presents, and futures (Grosz, 1999). For instance, the common idea that tells us that academics or graduate international students who move from one place to another carry specific attributes and characteristics of their geography with them makes us hold on to the idea that there is a strict correspondence between place and identity (e.g., Peruvians act as Peruvians because they come from Peru).
KeywordsInternational Student International Movement Institutional Time Woman Academic Institutional Space
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.To explore on similar ways to conceptualize space see Liz Bondi (2005). Gender and the Reality of Cities: embodies identities, social relations and performativities, on line papers archived by the Institute of Geography. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh; Larry Knopp (2004). Ontologies of place, placelessness, and movement: queer quests for identity and their impacts on contemporary geographic thought. Gender, Space & Culture, 11(1), pp. 121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.See the discussion on flexibility in thinking different stages of research: Emily Billo and Nancy Hiemstra (2013). Mediating messiness: expanding ideas of flexibility, reflexibity, and embodiment in fieldwork. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 20(3), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.See Carey-Ann Morrison (2010). Heterosexuality and home: Intimacies of space and spaces of touch. Emotion, Space and Society, xxx, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
- 4.See also other discussions on how to research human space: Denise Bijoux and Jameson Myers (2006). Interviews, solicited Diaries and photography: “new” ways of accessing everyday experiences of place. Graduate Journal of Asian-Pacific Studies, 4:1, pp. 44–64Google Scholar
- Deborah Britzman (1997). On refusing explication: towards a non-narrative narrativity. Resources for Feminist Research, 25, pp. 3–13Google Scholar