Skip to main content

Risk and International Society

  • Chapter
  • 253 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, international intervention has become an increasingly significant topic — during this period, humanitarian intervention, for example, has become an important issue in light of interventions in territories such as Kosovo and Libya and the lack of intervention in places such as Rwanda and Darfur. Other issues such as state failure and the appropriate response to mobile terrorist groups that may be located in a particular country also raise questions concerning the circumstances in which intervention in another state is legitimate. Added to this are debates over whether particular actors have the authority to conduct such interventions. Recent experience has shown that individual countries or groups of states have been willing to undertake interventions both with and without official authorisation from the United Nations Security Council.1 This poses further questions regarding the contemporary applicability of supposedly key norms of international society, such as sovereign equality or non-intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Yee-Kuang Heng (2006), War as Risk Management: Strategy and Conflict in an Age of Globalised Risks (New York: Routledge): p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, World Risk Society, p. 1. Also see Anthony Giddens (1990), The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anthony Giddens (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late-Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Handmer and Paul James (2007), ‘Trust Us and Be Scared: The Changing Nature of Contemporary Risk’, Global Society 21(1): p. 120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Claudia Aradau, Luis Lobo-Guerrero and Rens Van Munster (2008), ‘Security, Technologies of Risk, and the Political: Guest Editors’ Introduction’, Security Dialogue 39(2–3): pp. 147–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck, Risk Society, p. 22; Richard V. Ericson and Aaron Doyle (2004), ‘Catastrophe Risk, Insurance and Terrorism’, Economy and Society 33(2): p. 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabe Mythen and Sandra Walklate (2008), ‘Terrorism, Risk and International Security: The Perils of Asking “What If?”‘, Security Dialogue 39(2–3): p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darryl S. L. Jarvis (2007), ‘Risk, Globalisation and the State: A Critical Appraisal of Ulrich Beck and the World Risk Society Thesis’, Global Society 21(1): p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen (2002), ‘“9–11”: Globalisation, Security and World Order’, Working Paper 2002/2 (Copenhagen: Danish Institute of International Affairs): p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. William Bain (2003), Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press): p. 5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. James Gow (2005), Defending the West (Cambridge: Polity): p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Christopher Coker (2002), ‘Security, Independence and Liberty After September 11: Balancing Competing Claims’, introductory paper presented to the 21st Century Trust, Klingenthal Castle, near Strasbourg, France (12–18 May 2002), http://www.21stcenturytrust.org/post911.htm (accessed 27 February 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Also see Christopher Coker (2009), War in an Age of Risk (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Australian Department of Defence (2007), Australia’s National Security: Defence Update 2007 (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia): p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CASE Collective (2006), ‘Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto’, Security Dialogue 37(4): p. 468. Luhmann argues that risk is traditionally conceptualised as ‘a controlled extension of rational action’, meaning that rational action can aid in the estimation and management of risk. This conceptualisation is shared by Power in his work on risk management.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Niklas Luhmann (1998), Risk: A Sociological Theory (New York: Walter de Gruyter): p. 13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michael Power (2004), The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty (London: Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Claudia Aradau and Rens Van Munster (2007), ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations 13(1): p. 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulrich Beck (2000), ‘Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes’, in Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck and Joost Van Loon (eds), The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory (London: Sage): p. 219. In more recent work, Beck seems to have shifted further towards a constructivist understanding of risk, introducing the concept of’ staging’ — the imagining and identification of risk. As he suggests ‘For only by imagining and staging world risk does the future catastrophe become present …’

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich Beck (2009), World at Risk (Cambridge: Polity): p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. William Clapton (2011), ‘Risk in International Relations’, International Relations 25(3): p. 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ian Clark (2001), ‘Another “Double Movement”: The Great Transformation After the Cold War?’, Review of International Studies 27(5): pp. 237–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Francis Fukuyama (1992), The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Avon Books)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robert Cooper (2004), The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century (London: Atlantic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  25. For a further critique of contractual or rationalist conceptions of hierarchy, see J. C. Sharman (2013), ‘International Hierarchies and Contemporary Imperial Governance: A Tale of Three Kingdoms’, European Journal of International Relations 19(2): pp. 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gerry Simpson (2001), ‘Two Liberalisms’, European Journal of International Law 12(3): pp. 537–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The White House (September 2002), The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (Washington D.C.): p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 William Clapton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clapton, W. (2014). Risk and International Society. In: Risk and Hierarchy in International Society. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137396372_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics