Skip to main content

Friendship and International Order: An Ambiguous Liaison

  • Chapter

Abstract

To speak of international order entails engaging in rich and very diverse debates and visions of what international order is and what sorts of functions it may perform. Nicholas Rengger (2000, pp. 22–25) recently classified the range of responses to the problem of order from various subfields of International Relations (IR) into two broad ‘families’: the first ‘managerial’ family is primarily concerned either with maintaining, restoring, or improving the existing order; the second family holds the problem of order in its current version irresolvable and questions the present shapes and manifestations of the political. The ‘managerial’ response to the problem of order implies that value is inherently attached to the idea of having an order. For this reason it also involves a normative dimension indicating what a particular social grouping considers as desirable and worth achieving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle (1947) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics’ in H. Rackham (transl.) Aristotle in Twenty-Three Volumes, Vol. XIX (Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulac, S. (2000) ‘The Westphalian Legal Orthodoxy-Myth or Reality?’ Journal of the History of International Law, 2, 148–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenskoetter, F. (2007) ‘Friends, there are No Friends? An Intimate Reframing of the International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35:3, 647–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British and Foreign State Papers (BFSP) (London: H.M.S.O, 1839–1861).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M.T. Orationes in Verrum. Available at the Latin Library website, http://HYPERLINK http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/ver.shtml http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/ver.shtml, date accessed September 24, 2012.

  • Devere, H. and G. Smith (2010) ‘Friendship and Politics’, Political Studies Review, 8, 341–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchhardt, H. (2004) ‘From Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era’ in R. Lesaffer (ed.) Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 45–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought (London: Penguin Books), 76–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002) ‘Questions of Method’ in J. Faubion (ed.) Michel Foucault: Essential Works of Foucault1954–1984, Vol. 3 ‘Power’ (London: Penguin Books), 223–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2010) The Government of Self and Others. Lectures at the College de France, 1982–1983, Ed. by F. Gros (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1971) ‘A Structural Theory of Imperialism’, Journal of Peace Research, 8:2, 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, E.S. (1986) The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome, 1st edn 1984 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyam, R. (2002) Britain’s Imperial Century, 1815–1914. A Study of Empire and Expansion, 3rd edn (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, C. (1785) A Collection of all the Treaties of Peace, Alliance, and Commerce, between Great-Britain and Other Powers, From the Treaty Signed at Munster in1648, to the Treaties Signed at Paris 1783 (London: J. Debrett).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2003) British Imperialism (Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, E. (2002) Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keene, E. (2007) ‘A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-Making Against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century’, International Organization, 61:2, 311–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. (2009) ‘Against Friendship between Countries’, Journal of International Political Theory, 5:1, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1994) Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, D. (1997) Friendship in the Classical World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaffer, R. (2002) ‘Amicitia in Renaissance Peace and Alliance Treaties’, Journal of the History of International Law, 4, 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livy, T. (1905) History of Rome, Ed. by E. Rhys, Transl. by Rev. C. Roberts (London: J. M. Dent & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcellini, A. Res Gestae a Fine Corneli Taciti. Available at the Forum Romanum website, http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/ammianus17.html, date accessed September 29, 2009.

  • Osiander, A. (2001) ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth’, International Organization, 55:2, 251–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2003) Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rhetoric. 1 edition. (Cambridge, UK: Malden, MA: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2010) ‘A Republican Law of Peoples’, European Journal of Political Theory, 9:1, 70–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N.J. (2000) International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory? (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshchin, E. (2006) ‘The Concept of Friendship: From Princes to States’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:4, 599–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshchin, E. (2009a) Friendship in International Relations: A History of the Concept, PhD dissertation (Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshchin, E. (2009b) ‘Supplanting Love, Accepting Friendship: A History of Russian Diplomatic Concepts’, Redescriptions, 13, 125–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshchin, E. (2011) ‘Friendship of the Enemies: 20th Century Treaties of the United Kingdom and the USSR’, International Politics, 48:1, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshchin, E. (2013) ‘(Un)Natural and Contractual International Society: A Conceptual Inquiry’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:3, 257–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1996) The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (2003) The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, Transl. by G.L. Ulmen (New York: Telos Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach, S.A. (2009) On Civic Friendship: Including Women in the State (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1999) ‘Rhetoric and Conceptual Change’, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 3, 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of Politics. Vol. 1: Regarding Method (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Graham M. (2011) ‘Friendship and the World of States’, International Politics, 48:1, 10–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Pangle, L. (2003) Aristotle and the Philosophy of Friendship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, David (1996) ‘Contested Sovereignty: The Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism’ in T. Biersteker and C. Weber (eds) State Sovereignty as Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 22–49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thucydides (1992) History of the Peloponnesian War, Vols. II, III, Transl. by C.F. Smith (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaties, Conventions, International Acts, Protocols and Agreements between the United States and Other Powers, 1776–1909, [TCIAPA] 3 vols (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1910–1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis (London and New York: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (ed.) (1998) The Digest of Justinian Vol. II, Transl. A. Watson (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. (1978) Power Politics, Ed. by H. Bull and C. Holbraad (New York, London: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, Ed. by G. Wight and B. Porter (Leicester and London: Leicester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers, A. (1962) Discord and Collaboration. Essays on International Politics (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Evgeny Roshchin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roshchin, E. (2014). Friendship and International Order: An Ambiguous Liaison. In: Koschut, S., Oelsner, A. (eds) Friendship and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137396341_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics