Skip to main content

Agreeing, Disagreeing

  • Chapter
Politics in Private
  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

Although politics has become more of an everyday event and has to a certain extent been demystified, it nonetheless remains a confrontational subject. The individualization of choices and practices, a greater respect for the autonomy of each individual within the family unit and within the couple, together with a general weakening of social and political allegiances, have greatly contributed to this change. The narrowing of differences in political programs has also played a role in this, making politics a more banal event in both the public and private spheres. Disagreement and agreement still occur but on the basis of less stark, less sacred, and less divisive arguments than in former times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Anne Muxel, L’Expérience politique des jeunes (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alan S. Zuckerman, Josip Dasovic, and Jennifer Fitzgerald, Partisan Families: The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boris Wernli, “Homo- et hétérogamie dans les attitudes et le comportement politique en Suisse,” Swiss Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1 (2006): 33–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcel Gauchet, “Tocqueville, l’Amérique et nous. Sur la genèse des sociétés démocratiques,” Libre, vols. 80–87, no. 371, Petite Bibliothèque Payot (1980): 61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet, The People’s Choice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robert Huckfeldt, Jeannette Morehouse Mendez, and Tracey Osborn, “Disagreement, Ambivalence and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks,” Political Psychology 25, no. 1, (2004): 65–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muxel, A. (2014). Agreeing, Disagreeing. In: Politics in Private. Europe in Transition: The Nyu European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137395597_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics