Skip to main content

Management Control Research: A Review of Current Developments

  • Chapter
Management Control and Uncertainty

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview of current developments in management control research, looking both at method choices and thematic patterns. Traditionally, overview papers are based on what has been published over a specific period of time in a selection of leading journals. Our approach is slightly different. Rather than looking at what has been published, we want to see what people are currently working on, and to pick up on themes and trends that appear to define the contemporary research agenda of the field. As a point of departure, we choose the papers from the 2013 conference of the Management Control Association (MCA), held at Nyenrode Business University. The MCA conference has established itself as one of the main venues for management control researchers, and is known for its open-minded- ness regarding methodological positions and method choices. To get a richer perspective on the contemporary research agenda, we add a selection of papers that have been published in the period 2008–2012 and that appear to have a strong impact on ongoing research work. To identify these papers, we rely on Google Scholar for citation scores.1 The interesting thing about these scores is that they are not restricted to references in selected scholarly journals (as for instance Tompson’s ISI Web of Knowledge scores), but encompass all sources available on the internet — including unpublished working papers, conference proceedings and seminar presentations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdel-Kader, M. & Luther, R. (2008). The Impact of Firm Characteristics on Management Accounting Practices: A UK-Based Empirical Analysis. British Accounting Review, 40: 2–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P.S. & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, T. & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain. Con temporary A ccoun ting Research, 22:271–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcouffe, S., Berland, N. & Levant, Y. (2008). Actor-Networks and the Diffusion of Management Accounting Innovations: A Comparative Study. Management Accounting Research, 19: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. & Dekker, H. (2014). From Make-or-Buy Decisions to Coordinating Collaboration: Management Control in Strategic Alliances. In D. Otley & K. Soin (eds.), Management Control and Uncertainty: 47–68. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M. & Azzone, G. (2010). The Organizational Dynamics of Enterprise Risk Management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35: 659–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. S., Jagolinzer, A. D. & Larcker, D. F. (2010). Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research, 48: 225–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R. & Lang, M. H. (2008). International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality, journal of Accounting Research, 46: 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérard, E., Saulpic, O. & Zarlowski, P. (2013). Accounting for the Influence of Management Devices in the Evolution of Public Organizations Practices: A Sociomaterial Perspective. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Management Control Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J. & Chenhall, R. (2007). Defining Management Accounting Constructs: A Methodological Note on the Risks of Conceptual Misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32: 789–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J. A. & Zimmerman, J. L. (2010). Corporate Governance Myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay and Weber, journal of Accounting and Economics, 80: 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance Management Systems: A Conceptual Model. Management Accounting Research, 20: 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L., Evans III, J. H. & Moser, D. V. (2009). Agency Theory and Participative Budgeting Experiments. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21: 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caglio, A. & Ditillo, A. (2008). A Review and Discussion of Management Control in Inter-Firm Relationships: Achievements and Future Directions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33: 865–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSO. (1992 (2013)). Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Executive Summary. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., Foster, G. & Li, M. (2009). Reasons for Management Control Systems Adoption: Insights from Product Development Systems Choice by Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34: 322–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demski, J. S., ScFeltham, G. A. (1976). Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, R., Dekker, H. C. & Groot, T. (2013). Risk, Partner Selection and Contractual Control in Interfirm Relationships. Management Accounting Research, 24: 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., Ge, W. & McVay S. (2007). Determinants of Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44: 193–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A. & Otley D. (2009). The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20: 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri, J. F. (2006). Organizational Culture and Performance Measurement Systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31: 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G. (1972). An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10(3): 156–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley J., Myers, L. & Shakespeare, C. (2008). Market Reactions to the Disclosure of Internal Control Weaknesses and to the Characteristics of Those Weaknesses under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies, 13: 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebl, M. R. W., Kepler, J. & Quinn, M. (2013). Management Accounting Routines in Small Family Businesses: Emerging or Carried? Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Management Control Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. (2011). Accounting Scholarship that Advances Professional Knowledge and Practice. The Accounting Review, 86: 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. M. & Moser, A. (2008). Behavioral Effects of Nonfinancial Performance Measures: The Role of Procedural Fairness. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2): 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury M. (2008). Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33: 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmi, T. & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management Control Systems as a Package: Opportunities, Challenges and Research Directions. Management Accounting Research, 19: 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. (2010). Paradigms in Accounting Research: A View from North America. Management Accounting Research, 21: 116–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikes, A. (2009). Risk Management and Calculative Cultures. Management Accounting Research, 20: 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy J. (2010). Creating DynamicTensions through a Balanced Use of Management Control Systems. Accoun ting, Organizations and Society, 35: 499–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. (1994). Management Control in Contemporary Organizations: Towards a Wider Framework. Management Accounting Research, 5, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. (1999). Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research. Management Accounting Research, 10: 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paape, L. & Speklé, R. F. (2012). The Adoption and Design of Enterprise Risk Management Practices: An Empirical Study. European Accounting Review, 21: 533–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. C. & Weber, D. P. (2012). How Effective Is Internal Control Reporting under SOX 404? Determinants of the (Non-)Disclosure of Existing Material eaknesses. Journal of Accounting Research, 50: 811–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. R., Sikes, S. A. & Weaver, C. D. (2010). Performance Measurement of Corporate Tax Departments. The Accounting Review, 85: 1035–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstreich, D. & Wooliscroft, B. (2009). Measuring the Impact of Accounting Journals Using Google Scholar and the G-Index. British Accounting Review, 41: 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance, LII: 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soin, K. & Collier, P. (2013). Risk and Risk Management in Management Accounting and Control. Management Accounting Research, 24: 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speklé, R. F. & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Effects on Performance. Management Accounting Research, 25: 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier, S. & Otley D. (2012). A Conceptual Development of Simons’ Levers of Control Framework. Management Accounting Research, 23: 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanderley C, Cullen, J. & Tsamenyi, M. (2013). Diffusion and Variation in Management Accounting Practices: The Balanced Scorecard Adoption. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the Management Control Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Roland Speklé and Anne-Marie Kruis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Speklé, R., Kruis, AM. (2014). Management Control Research: A Review of Current Developments. In: Otley, D., Soin, K. (eds) Management Control and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137392121_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics