Skip to main content

Women and Sentencing: Challenges and Choices

  • Chapter

Abstract

Baroness Corston’s report: A review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system made a series of recommendations to bring about improvements in relation to the treatment of women in the criminal justice system. Now, some six years after her report, we find that it is well recognised that women face very different hurdles from men in their journey towards a law abiding life, and that responding appropriately and effectively to the problems that bring women into the criminal justice system require a distinct approach. (Justice Select Committee report: Women Offenders: After the Corston Report. Second Report of Sessions 2013–2014. London: House of Commons.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, H. (1987) justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and judicial Decisions. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairy, M. and Mclvor, G. (2008) Chaotic Lives: A Profile of Women in the Criminal justice System in Lothian and Borders. Edinburgh: Lothian and Borders Community Justice Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (1983) On rights and powers: some notes on penal politics. In: D. Garland and P. Young (eds) The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penalty and Social Analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2002) (ed.) Women and Imprisonment: The Struggle for justice. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (2013) Against rehabilitation; for reparative justice. In: K. Carrington, M. Ball, E. O’Brien and J. Tauri (eds) Crime, justice and Social Democracy: International perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (2008) The Sentencing Guidelines Council. A Practical Perspective. Criminal Law Review, 4: 277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corston, Baroness (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal justice System. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, J. and Spencer, J. (2003) Women Behind Bars: Explanations and Implications. Howard Journal of Criminal justice, 42: 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (2014) Press Release: Extra Funding for Mental Health Nurses to be Based at Police Stations and Courts across the Country, https://www.gov.uk/govemment/news/extra-funding-for-mental-health-nurses-to-be-based-at-police-stations-and-courts-across-the-country. 6 Jan 2014.

  • Devlin, P. (1979) The Judge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominelli, L. (1984) Differential Justice: Domestic Labour, Community Service and Female Offenders. Probation Journal, 31: 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, S., Silvestri, M., Evans, K., Matthews, R. and Walklate, S. (2010) Condition Cautions: Evaluation of the Women Specific Condition Pilot. Ministry of Justice Research Series 14/10. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, S. and Piper, C. (2012) Sentencing and Punishment. The Quest for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (1984) Women on Trial: a Study of The Female Suspect, Defendant, and Offender in the Criminal Law and Criminal Justice System. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. and Morris, A. (1983) Sex, Sentencing and Reconviction. British Journal of Criminology, 23(3): 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett Society (2004) Women and the Criminal Justice System: A Report of the Fawcett Society’s Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System. London: Fawcett Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2001) Critical decisions and processes in the criminal courts. In: E. McLaughlin and J. Muncie (eds) Controlling Crime. London: Sage/Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2005) Back to basics in crime control: weaving in women. In: M. Matravers (ed.) Managing Modernity. Politics and the Culture of Control. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2007) Sentencing and gender. In: R. Sheehan, G. Mclvor and C. Trotter (eds) Working with Women Offenders in the Community. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2010) What works with women offenders? In: M. Herzog-Evans (ed.) Transnational Criminology Manual. Vol. 3. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2013) Working with women in probation: “Will you, won’t you, will you, won’t you, won’t you join the dance?” In: P. Ugwidike and P. Raynor(eds) What Works in Offender Compliance: International Perspectives and Evidence-based Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Loucks, N. (1997) Magistrates’ explanations of sentencing decisions. In: C. Hedderman and L. Gelsthorpe (eds) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. and Monis, A. (2002) Women’s Imprisonment in England and Wales: A Penal Paradox. Criminal Justice, 2(3): 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L., Sharpe, G. and Roberts, J. (2007) Provision for Women Offenders in the Community. London: The Fawcett Society, www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/ aiGiordano, P., Deines, J. and Cemkovich, S. (2006) In and out of crime: a life course perspective on girls’ delinquency. In: K. Heimer and C. Kruttschmtt (eds) Gender and Crime: Patterns in Victimization and Offending. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffatt, K. (2004) Criminogenic Need and the Transformative Risk Subject: Hybridizations of Risk/Need in Penalty. Punishment and Society, 7: 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2004) Why are more women being sentenced to custody? In: G. Mclvor (ed.) Women Who Offend. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2011) Policy developments in England and Wales. In: R. Sheehan, G. Mclvor and C. Trotter (eds) Working With Women Offenders in the Community. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. and Gelsthorpe, L. (1997) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. Home Office Research Study 170. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. and Guriby, C. (2013) Diverting Women from Custody: The Importance of Understanding Sentencers’ Perspectives. Probation Journal, 60(4): 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C, Palmer, E. and Hollin, C. with the assistance of Gunby, C. (2008) Implementing Services for Women Offenders and Those ‘at Risk’ of Offending: Action Research with Together Women. Ministry of Justice Research Series 12/08. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F. (1968) The Deviance of Women: A Critique and an Enquiry. British Journal of Sociology, 19(2): 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F. (1986) Models of Justice: Portia or Persephone? Some Thoughts on Equality, Fairness and Gender in the Field of Criminal Justice. International Journal of Sociology of Law, 14: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard League for Penal Reform (2006) Women in the penal system, Second Report on women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system. All Party Parliamentary Group on Women in the Penal system, Chaired by Baroness Cor s ton. London: The Howard League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2002) Gender issues in penal policy and penal theory. In: P. Carlen(ed.) Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., Hedderman, C. Palmer, E. and Hollin, C. (2011) Re-offending Analysis of Women Offenders Referred to Together Women (TW) and the Scope to Divert from Custody. Ministry of Justice Research Series 11/11. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice Select Committee (2013) Women Offenders: After the Corston Report. Second Report of Sessions 2013–2014. London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, N. (1998) HMPI Cornton Vale: Research into Drugs and Alcohol, Volence and Bullying, Sicides and Self-Injury, and Backgrounds of Abuse. SPS Occasional Paper 1/98. Edinburgh: Scottish Prison Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, A. (2010) The Sentencing Council, The Public’s Sense of Justice, and Personal Mitigation. Criminal Law Review, (12): 906–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdivitt, K. (2008) An Evaluation of the Structured Deferred Sentence Pilots. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeavy J. (2011) A ‘New Politics’ of Austerity, Workfare and Gender? The UK Coalition Government’s Welfare Reform Proposals. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magistrates Association Paper (2011) Women in the Justice System. Policy Paper 11/33. London: Magistrates’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, G. and Brockington, N. (1988) Female Offenders and the Probation Service. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(2): 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M., Mclvor, G. and Loucks, N. (2008) ‘Time Out’ for Women: Innovation in Scotland in a Context of Change. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(4): 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, M. and Mclvor, G. (2011) Women, drugs and community interventions. In: R. Sheehan, G. Mclvor and C. Trotter (eds) Working with Women Offenders in the Community. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, T. (2010) Exploring community service, understanding compliance. In: F. McNeill, P. Raynor and C. Trotter (eds) Offender Supervision: New Directions in Theory, Research and Practice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclvor, G. (2010) Women and crime: The rise in female imprisonment in western countries. In: M. Herzog-Evans (ed.) Transnational Criminology Manual, Vol. 2, Nijmegen. The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2012a) Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2011. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2012b) Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System 2011. A Ministry of Justice publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. London: Ministry of Justice. (Supplementary Tables are indicated by an S).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2012c) Improving Judicial Diversity: Progress towards Delivery of the Report of the Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity 2010. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013a) Transforming Rehabilitation: A Strategy for Reform. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013b) Governments Strategic Objectives for Female Offenders. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minson, R. (2014) Mitigating Motherhood: A Study of the Impact of Motherhood on Sentencing Decisions in England and Wales. London: Howard League.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. and Jemphrey, A. (2013) Women’s imprisonment in Northern Ireland: social exclusion, punishment and breaches of human rights. In: M. Malloch and G. Mclvor (eds) Women, Punishment and Social Justice: Human Rights and Penal Practices. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. and Gelsthorpe, L. (1981) ‘Women and Crime’. Papers presented to the Cropwood Round-Table Conference 1980. Cropwood Conference Series No. 13, University of Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxon, D. (1988) Sentencing Practice in the Crown Court. Home Office Research Study 103. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2013) Stocktake of Women’s Services for Offenders in the Community. London: NOMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, S. and Stanley, S. (2008) The Use of the Community Order and the Suspended Sentence Order for Women. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Player, E. (2012) Sentencing women: towards gender equality. In: L. Zedner and J.V Roberts (eds) Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice:Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust (2000) Justice For Women: The Need For Reform. The report of the Committee on Women’s Imprisonment, Chaired by Professor Dorothy Wedderburn. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust (2011) Reforming Women’s Justice: Report of the Women’s Taskforce. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. (2013) Women’s Custodial Estate Review. London, Ministry of Justice: National Offender Management Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumgay J. (2004) When Victims Become Offenders: In Search of Coherence in Policy and Practice. London: The Fawcett Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentencing Advisory Panel (2007) Advice to the Sentencing Guidelines Council. Overarching Principles of Sentencing. London: Sentencing Advisory Panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1976) Women, Crime and Criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1962) Women in Prison. A Study in Penal Methods. London: Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorsby A., Shapland, J., Farrall, S., McNeill, R, Priede, C. and Robinson, G. (2013) Probation Staff Views of the Skills for Effective Engagement Development (SEED) Pilot. National Offender Management Service Analytical Summary 2013. London: National Offender Management Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, J. and Jagger, E. (2006) Denying Responsibility: Sentencers’ Accounts of Their Decisions to Imprison. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5): 803–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2014) Are Problem-Solving Courts the Way Forward for Justice? Working Paper 2/2014. London: The Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, A. (1997) Mad or Bad? Child-killers, Gender and the Courts. British Journal of Criminology, 37: 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks-Wiffen, S. (2011) Voice of a Child. London: The Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, A. (1990) Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the Criminal Justice System. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zedner, L. (1991) Women, Crime and Custody in Victorian England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Loraine Gelsthorpe and Gillian Sharpe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gelsthorpe, L., Sharpe, G. (2015). Women and Sentencing: Challenges and Choices. In: Roberts, J.V. (eds) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390400_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics