Skip to main content
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

Unlike its two predecessors, the Third duma completed its full term, from its convening in November 1907 to its scheduled dissolution in June 1912. It proved to be prerevolutionary Russia’s longest uninterrupted experience with parliamentary government and thus Russian social democracy’s as well. Also, unlike its predecessors, it was the product of the revolution’s defeat. That fact more than any other determined its origins and its course. Lenin had to mount an even more vigorous campaign to convince his Bolshevik comrades to participate in a body that offered even fewer possibilities for revolutionary work. Contrary to the claims of a vocal minority, the choice wasn’t either/or—either parliamentary or illegal work. Both, Lenin argued, not only could be done but indeed had to be done in order to make effective the work in each sphere of activity. What Lenin had to do to win the skeptics to his position is the subject of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Geoffrey A. Hosking, The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, vol. 15 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1978), pp. 457–58. Hereafter, citations from his Collected Works will be designated as in this case: 15, pp. 457–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., pp. 44–48. Victoria E. Bonnell, Roots of Rebellion: Workers’ Politics and Organizations in St. Petersburg and Moscow, 1900–1914 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983), pp. 338–44, provides evidence that Lenin was essentially right about the “upswing” in Moscow—that it was indeed “partial” and that the Bolsheviks who thought it signaled a new upsurge were wrong.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a few details, see Alfred Levin, The Third Duma, Election and Profile (Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1973), pp. 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard Pipes, ed., The Unknown Lenin: From the Secret Archive (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, vol. 46 (New York: International Publishers, 1975–2004), pp. 197–98.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See August H. Nimtz, Lenins Electoral Strategy from Marx and Engels through the Revolution of 1905: The Ballot, the Streets—or Both (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 30–31. Hereafter, the first volume is referred to as LES1905.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nadezhda Krupskaya, Memories of Lenin (London: Panther Books, 1970), p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alfred Levin, The Second Duma: A Study of the Social-Democratic Party and the Russian Constitutional Experiment (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1940), p. 341.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 August H. Nimtz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nimtz, A.H. (2014). “Legal and Illegal Work”. In: Lenin’s Electoral Strategy from 1907 to the October Revolution of 1917. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389954_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics