Skip to main content

Moving from Risk to Safety: Work with Children and Families in Child Welfare Contexts

  • Chapter

Abstract

Child welfare is an emotive and complicated area of social work practice. Child welfare not only has its own internal complexities but also attracts immense political and media scrutiny every time a child abuse tragedy plays out. In addition, the working lives of human service workers take place inside organizations that are themselves in the public spotlight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alaszewski, Andy, and Adam Burgess. 2007. “Risk, Time and Reason.” Health, Risk and Society 9 (4): 349–358. doi:10.1080/13698570701612295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1992. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Insoo Kim, and Sarah Kelly. 2000. Building Solutions in Child Protective Services. London: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Helen. 2003. Child Protection Practice: Beyond the Rhetoric. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Marie. 2004. Child and Family Welfare: Statutory Responses to Children at Risk. Christchurch: The Awatea Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Shazer, Steve. 1991. Putting Difference to Work. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell. 1999. “Risk, Calculable and Incalculable.” In Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives, edited by Deborah Lupton, 131–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Child Protection. 2011. The Signs of Safety Child Protection Framework. 2nd ed. Perth: Department for Child Protection, Government of Western Australia. https://www.dcp.wa.gov.au/Resources/Documents/Policies% 20and% 20Frame-works/SignsOfSafetyFramework2011.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargion, Silvia. 2014. “Synergies and Thensions in Child Protection and Parent Support: Policy Lines and Practitioners’ Cultures.” Child and Family Social Work 19 (1): 24–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00877.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Brid, Karen Broadhurst, and Kim Holt. 2012. “Thinking Systemically—Thinking Politically: Building Strong Partnerships with Children and Families in the Context of Rising Inequality.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (4): 618–633. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Brid, Sue White, and Kate Morris. 2014. Re-imagining Child Protection: Towards Humane Social Work with Families. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Harry. 2004. Protecting Children in Time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences of Modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fook, Jan. 2002. Social Work: Critical Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • France, Alan, Kate Freiburg, and Ross Homel. 2010. “Beyond Risk Factors: Towards a Holistic Prevention Paradigm.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1192–1210. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Neil, Nigel Parton, and Marit Skivenes. 2011. Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, Philipp. 2006. “Risk Assessment in Child Protection: Problem Rather Tan Solution?” Australian Social Work 59 (1): 86–98. doi:10.1080/03124070 500449804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Mel. 2011. “Back to Basics: A Critique of the Strengths Perspective in Social Work.” Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 92 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, David. 2010. “The Safety of Children and the Parent-Worker Relationship in Cases of Child Abuse and Neglect.” Child Abuse Review 19 (5): 330–341. doi:10.1002/car.1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddell, Emily. 2014. “Theorising the Signs of Safety Approach to Child Protection Social Work: Positioning, Codes and Power.” Children and Youth Services Review 47: 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. “The Ethics of Predictive Risk Modelling in the Aotearoa/New Zealand Child Welfare Context: Child Abuse Prevention or Neo-liberal Tool?” Critical Social Policy 35 (1): 69–88. doi:10.1177/0261018314543224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Križ, Katrin, and Marit Skivenes. 2013. “Systemic Differences in Views on Risk: A Comparative Case Vignette Study of Risk Assessment in England, Norway and the United States (California).” Children and Youth Services Review 35 (11): 1862–1870. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Geraldine, and Kenneth Macdonald. 2010. “Safeguarding: A Case for Intelligent Risk Management.” British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1174–1191. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Eileen. 2005. “Improving Practice: Child Protection as a Systems Problem.” Children and Youth Services Review 27 (4): 375–391. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Eileen, Julie S. Taylor, and Caroline Bradbury-Jones. 2014. “Understanding the Causal Pathways to Child Maltreatment: Implications for Health and Social Care Policy and Practice.” Child Abuse Review 23 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1002/car.2266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, Nigel. 2000. “Some Thoughts on the Relationship between Theory and Practice in and for Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 30 (4): 449–463. doi:10.1093/bjsw/30.4.449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, Horst W. J., and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/bf01405730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, Dennis. 2010. The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice. Kansas City: Strengths Institute, University of Kansas, School of Social Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, Aron, and Dennis Wagner. 2005. “The Next Step: Integrating Actuarial Risk Assessment and Clinical Judgment into an Evidence-Based Practice Framework in CPS Case Management.” Children and Youth Services Review 27 (4): 409–427. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Brenda. 2002. “A Social Constructionist Approach to Theorizing Child Welfare: Considering Attachment Theory and Ways to Reconstruct Practice.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 22 (1/2): 131–149. doi:10.1300/J067v22n01_09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spratt, Trevor. 2008. “Possible Futures for Social Work with Children and Families in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States.” Child Care in Practice 14 (4): 413–427. doi:10.1080/13575270802267887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, Sonya. 2011. “Constructing Moral Responses to Risk: A Framework for Hopeful Social Work Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 41 (8): 1514–1531. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Tony. 2013. “‘Our Tarif Will Rise’: Risk, Probabilities and Child Protection.” Health, Risk and Society 15 (1): 67–83. doi:10.1080/13698575.2012.753416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, Andrew. 2004. “Relationship-Grounded, Safety-Organised Child Protection Practice: Dreamtime or Real-Time Option for Child Welfare?” Protecting Children 19 (2): 14–25. http://www.americanhumane.org/children/professional-resources/protecting-children-journal/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, Andrew, and Steve Edwards. 1999. Signs of Safety: A Solution and Safety Oriented Approach to Child Protection Casework. London: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, Andrew, and Susanne Essex. 2006. Working with “Denied” Child Abuse: The Resolutions Approach. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Anne. 1999. “Guilty Knowledge.” Families in Society 80 (4): 327–332. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kate van Heugten Anita Gibbs

Copyright information

© 2015 Kate van Heugten and Anita Gibbs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keddell, E., Stanley, T. (2015). Moving from Risk to Safety: Work with Children and Families in Child Welfare Contexts. In: van Heugten, K., Gibbs, A. (eds) Social Work for Sociologists. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389688_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics