Skip to main content
  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 4, I examine the general trend in the orientation of laws and institutions and income inequality in the United States from the mid-1930s through the 1970s. I show that laws were made more inclusive and the income share of the top 1 percent decreased. I then explore some explanations for why we have such a mixed record of ameliorating income inequality in the United States when our political system is based on equality. Finding these explanations lacking, the chapter ends in suspense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Katznelson, I. (2005). When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W.W Norton. pp. 113–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, “Remarks by the President at ‘Remembering Franklin D. Roosevelt,’ 50th Anniversary Commemorative Services,” The Little White House, Warm Springs, Georgia, April 12, 1995, cited in Theda Skocpol, “The G.I. Bill and U.S. Social Policy, Past and Future,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 14 (Summer 1997), pp. 95–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katznelson, I. (2005). When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert C. Lieberman, Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katznelson, I. (2005). When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W.W. Norton. pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nixon enforced Lyndon Johnson’s affirmative action plan, explains Katznelson, because he wanted “to embarrass organized labor, and enlarge a growing schism between the civil rights movement and white members of unions who might be persuaded to shift their votes to the Republican Party.” See Katznelson, I. (2005). When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vogel, D. (1989). Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America. New York: Basic Books. p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. This paragraph and the following two take considerably from: Stelzner, Mark. 2014. “Political Contest, Policy Control, and Inequality in the United States,” Review of Keynesian Economics, Vol. 2 No. 3, Autumn 2014. pp. 365–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogel, D. (1989). Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America. New York: Basic Books. p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. In talking about the nation’s commitment to equality, Lincoln was quoting the Declaration of Independence because the only mention of equality in the Constitution, before the Reconstruction amendments, was in “granting each state an equal number of senators.” See Foner, E. (1998). The Story of American Freedom. New York: W.W. Norton. p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foner, E. (1970). Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piven, F. F. & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piven, F. F. & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 2–3

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindsey, A. (1964). The Pullman Strike: The Story of a Unique Experiment and of a Great Labor Upheaval. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taken from Montgomery, D. (1987). “The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925.” Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press. p. 209.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofstadter, R. (1955). The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. New York: Knopf. p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weyl, W. E. (1912). The New Democracy: An Essay on Certain Political and Economic Tendencies in the United States. New York: Macmillan Co. p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Mark Stelzner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stelzner, M. (2015). Mixed Results. In: Economic Inequality and Policy Control in the United States. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388117_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics