Skip to main content

Hearing the Silent Harmony: Revisioning Ethics in the Zhuangzi

  • Chapter
The Ethical Foundations of Early Daoism
  • 236 Accesses

Abstract

The social world,” according to Clifford Geertz, “does not divide at its joints into perspicuous we’s with whom we can empathize, however much we differ with them, and enigmatical they’s, with whom we cannot, however much we defend to the death their right to differ from us.”1 This deep equivocality, the sense that the significant works of the human imagination “speak with equal power to the consoling piety that we are all like to one another and to the worrying suspicion that we are not,”2 exhibits itself nowhere more than in those moments of cross-cultural inquiry where our subjects seem to be conceptually deaf to certain registers of our experience that seem to be so much with us, as in the following episode:

When I first began to do fieldwork among the Shona-speaking Manyika of Zimbabwe about ten years ago, I tried to find a word that would correspond to the English concept “morality.” I explained what I meant by asking my informants to describe the norms for good behaviour toward other people. The answer was unanimous. The word for this was tsika. But when I asked my bilingual informants to translate tsika into English, they said that it was “good manners.” And whenever I asked somebody to define tsika, they would say: “Tsika is the proper way to greet people,” or “Tsika is to show respect.”3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Clifford Geertz, “The Uses of Diversity,” in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values VII, ed. by Sterling M. McMurrin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 262.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geertz, “Found in Translation: On the Social History of the Moral Imagination,” Georgia Review 31.4 (1977), 796.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anita Jacobson-Widding, “‘I lied, I farted, I stole…’: Dignity and Morality in African Discourses on Personhood,” in The Ethnography of Moralities, ed. by Signe Howell (New York: Routledge, 1997), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iris Murdoch, “Vision and Choice in Morality,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary 30 (1956), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donald Davidson, “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,” in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), 185.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, Third Edition, trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe (New York: Macmillan, 1958), §215.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Wong, Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), xii.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. See T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. C. Lau, Ho Che Wah and Chen Fong Ching, eds., A Concordance to the Mengzi 孟子逐字索弓, ICS Series (Hong Kong: Commercial Press, 1995), 13.26/70/4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Wong, “Relativism,” in A Companion to Ethics, ed. by Peter Singer (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 445. See also Moral Relativity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Wong, “Taoism and the Problem of Equal Respect,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 11 (1984), 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Christine Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Second Edition (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984), 216.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I employ “significant symbols” here as Geertz does in the following passage: “Thinking consists not of ‘happenings in the head’…but of a traffic in what have been called… significant symbols—words for the most part but also gestures, drawings, musical sounds, mechanical devices like clocks, or natural objects like jewels—anything, in fact, that is disengaged from its mere actuality and used to impose meaning upon experience.” I have chosen “symbols” rather than just “stories” or “narratives” or “standards” to throw a wider theoretical net onto the data. See Clifford Geertz, “The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man,” in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Since I do not want to bias this account toward those traditions (e.g., varieties of theism, Platonism), which have a monistic structure in which a single, unifying Good forms the foundation of belief, worship, and conduct, I will use “(in)comparably higher,” or just generally “the Good,” to designate those sources of normativity which are most important to an individual or group, relatively speaking. Again, the sources of normativity that I am referring to here do not necessarily refer to transhuman realities, though, of course, they will in many traditions. For accounts that refer solely to transhuman sources of normativity in the Western tradition, see Robert M. Adams, Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. and John P. Reeder, Jr., Source, Sanction, and Salvation: Religion and Morality in Judaic and Christian Traditions (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. By “force” I mean the thoroughness with which such symbols are internalized in the personalities of the individuals and social groups who adopt it, its centrality or marginality in their lives, and by “scope” I mean the range of social contexts within which these symbols are regarded as having more or less relevance. See Clifford Geertz, Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iris Murdoch, Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (New York: Penguin Books, 1993), 260.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guo Xiang 郭象, Zhuangzi jishi 黄自己是, ed. by Guo Qingfan (Taipei: Muduo Press, 1983), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harold Roth, “Redaction Criticism and the Early History of Taoism,” Early China 19 (1994), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Richard Niebuhr, The Responsible Self: An Essay in Christian Moral Philosophy (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1978), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Derek Parfit, On What Matters, Volume 1 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), esp. Part I.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Jonathan Dancy, “Moral Particularism”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/moral-particularism/. See also Jonathan Dancy, Ethics Without Principles (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cf. Sean McKeever and Michael Ridge, Principled Ethics: Generalism as a Regulative Ideal (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Angus Graham, “Chuang-tzu’s Essay on Seeing Things as Equal,” History of Religions 9 (1969/1970), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. C. Graham, Chuang-tzu: The Inner Chapters (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2001), 144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Jung H. Lee

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, J.H. (2014). Hearing the Silent Harmony: Revisioning Ethics in the Zhuangzi . In: The Ethical Foundations of Early Daoism. Palgrave Macmillan’s Content and Context in Theological Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384867_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics