Abstract
Although many historians have examined demonology in tandem with trials, most have focussed on ecclesiastical paradigms, at the expense of a broader range of literature.1 I would argue strongly that as many representations of the witch and the Devil as possible ought to be examined, so as to better comprehend their many guises and to inform our investigations into the attributes of the witch and the creation of varying paradigms. By investigating a broader range of literary genres, the more or less standardized ecclesiastical stereotype of the witch is not only challenged, but stood completely on its head. The Devil and the witch, when inhabiting the liminal space of fiction, were often the subjects of irony and parody, as this chapter will illustrate. In addition, the very nature of the literary genres used could influence the interpretation and representation of motifs within witchcraft discourse. For example, in the Polish literature predating the trials, the figure of the witch was clearly a general literary signifier of old, allowing authors to depict and manipulate the motif freely. I would argue that the presence of the figure of the witch or the Devil in such a variety of spheres confirms the widespread influence of witchcraft belief, supporting Clark’s view that demonology was in fact a vital forum for the debate of many issues in the early modern period.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For works that examine the witchcraft persecution in tandem with demonology or literature see: Purkiss, The Witch; Brauner, Fearless Wives; Willis, Malevolent Nurture; M. Gibson, Early Modern Witches: Witchcraft Cases in Contemporary Writing (London, 2000)
J.M. Schmidt, Glaube und Skepsis. Die Kurpfalz und die abendländische Hexenverfolgung, 1446–1685 (Bielefeld, 2000); and Roberts and Normand (eds), Witchcraft.
Koranyi, ‘Czary i gusla’, p. 2, and M. Siennik, Lekarstwa doświadczone(Cracow, 1564), pp. 118, 199. This work was not reprinted.
S. Syreniusz, Zielnik, z herbarzem z ięzyka łacinskiego zowią to iest opisane własne imion, kszaltu (Cracow, 1673 [1613]), pp. 124–6. Syreniusz was doctor to the Jesuits in Cracow for over twenty years. APP AM Kalisz I/158, pp. 17–29, 202.
J. Haur, Skład albo skarbiec znakomitych sekretόw ekonomiej ziemiańskiej (Cracow, 1693 [1689]), p. 418. Oekonomia ziemiańska was reprinted in 1679 and the compilation work was reprinted in 1744 (there were two editions published that year by the Jesuits in Warsaw and Cracow), 1756, 1757, 1788, 1790 and 1793. The compilation editions were published by the Barefoot Carmelite order at Berdychόw and by Jesuits in Warsaw and Cracow. The Jesuit editions (1730, 1744, 1756 and 1757) contained additions by Dr Bystrzycki.
S. Duńczewski, ‘Kalendarz Duńczewskiego 1759 r.’, in B. Baczko and H. Hinz (eds), Kalendarz Pötstuletni 1750–1800 (Warsaw, 1975), pp. 55–8.
J. Januszowski, Wrözki Iana Podworzeckiego (Cracow, 1589), pp. 5, 6, 9, 20, 24–30.
Behringer, Witchcraft, p. 112; H. Kamen, The Iron Century: Social Change in Europe, 1550–1669 (London, 1971)
F. Giedroyc, Mör w Polsce w wiekach ubiegłych: zarys historyczny (Warsaw, 1899), pp. 52–3, bears out this claim. The winter of 1588 was reported as extremely severe in Poland.
S. Poklatecki, Pogrom, czarnoksiąskie błądy, latawcöw zdrady i alchimickie fałsze jako rozplasza (Cracow, 1595), fos A, Aii, Bii, Fiii, Gv.
J. Sokolski, Zaświaty Staropolskie (Wrocław, 1994), p. 218
S. Feyrabend, Theatrum diabolorum das ist: Warhaffte eigentliche und kurtze Beschreibung aller-leygrewlicher, schrecklicher und abschewlicher Laster (Frankfurt am Main, 1575); Theatrum de veneficis, das ist: Von Teuffelsgespenst, Zauberern und Giffthereitern, Schwartzküstlern, Hexen und Unholden, vieler fürnemmen Historien und Exempel(Frankfurt am Main, 1586); and Postępek, pp. 97, 106, 114, 118–19. Estreicher notes a Russian translation of Postępek in 1687.
See J. Rytel, ‘Barok’ in J. Jakubowski (ed.) Literatura Polska od średniowiecza do pozytywizmu (Warsaw, 1974), pp. 140–44
P. Oppenheimer, A Pleasant Vintage of Till Eulenspiegel (Middletown, 1972), pp. xvii, xviii
L.-L. Sosset, Le Personnage de Tiel Eulenspiegel à travers l’Histoire, la Légend et le Folklore(Rodez and Andrimont, 1938)
K. Badecki (ed.), Pisma Jana Dzwonowskiego(Cracow, 1910 [1608–25])
J. Miśkowiak, Ze Studiöw nad ‘Sowizdrzatem’ w Polsce (Poznań, 1938)
J. Ziomek, Renesans (Warsaw, 1998), pp. 144–9
B. Verheyen, Till Eulenspiegel. Revolutionär, Aufklärer, Assensater: zur Eulenspiegel-Rezeption in der DDR (Frankfurt am Main and Oxford, 2004)
R. Tenberg, Die deutsche Till Eulenspiegel (Würzburg, 1996)
W. Virmond, Eulenspiegel und seine Interpreten (Berlin, 1981)
G. Bollenbeck, Till Eulenspiegel (Stuttgart, 1985)
C. Wolf and G. Wolf, Till Eulenspiegel (Frankfurt am Main, 1976). There is also a museum dedicated to the character; see www.eulenspiegel-museum.de.
S. Grzeszczuk, Antologia literatury sowizdrzalskiej XVI i XVII wieku (Wrocław, 1985), pp. v, vi, lxx–iv.
‘Statut Jana Dzwonowskiego’, in K. Badecki (ed.), Pisma Jana Dzwonowskiego(Cracow, 1910 [1608–25]), pp. 67–71.
‘Peregrynacja dziadowska’ (1612), in Badecki (ed.), Polska komedia rybałtowska, pp. 205–10. Estreicher gives 1614 as the publication date.
‘Synod klechόw Podgorskich’ (1607), in Badecki (ed.), Polska komedia rybałtowska, 11. 226–9, 803–11.
‘Z nowinami torba kursorska lozefa Pięknorzyckiego z Mątwiłaiec, naleziona v Nalewaykόw’, in K. Badecki (ed.) Polska satyra mieszczańska (Cracow 1950 [1645]), p. 304.
S. Szymonowicz, Sielanki (Cracow, 1921 [1614]), 11. 88–92, which takes Theocritus’ Idyll II as its model.
K. Opaliński, Satyry (Cracow, 1652 [1650]), p. 11.
D. Wisner, Tractatus brevis de extramagi, lamii, veneticis (Poznań, 1639).
APP AM Opalenica I/5, pp. 16–19; A. Sajkowski, Krzysztof Opaliński Wojewoda Poznański (Poznań, 1960), pp. 69, 71, 82, 219
R. Pollak (ed.) Listy Krzysztofa Opalińskiego do brata Łukasza 1641–53 (Wrocław, 1957).
Wόdka z elixierem (Poznań, 1729), fos A3, I2, D3, D, C2, A3, B3, C, G3, H, H2. See also K. Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (London, 1997 [1971]), and Macfarlane, Witchcraft.
F. Bohomolec, ‘Czary’ in J. Kott (ed.) Komedie na teatrum (Warsaw, 1960 [1775]), pp. 353–5.
Copyright information
© 2013 Wanda Wyporska
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wyporska, W. (2013). Beyond Demonology: Blame the Witches. In: Witchcraft in Early Modern Poland, 1500–1800. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384218_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384218_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28193-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38421-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)