Abstract
History, it may be argued, has been unkind to some states and downright vicious to others. Few regions — ancient or modern — are home to the combustible mix of divergent geographic, ethnic, religious and tribal allegiances as the Balkans. Fewer still have undergone the transition from rabid internecine strife to nascent democratic legitimization, as have the post-Yugoslav states of the Balkan region.
Grateful thanks are due to Michal Gloznek, Canterbury Christ Church Politics/IR 2014 graduate, for both his research and insightful editorial assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bickerton, C., P. Cunliffe, and A. Gourevitch. Politics Without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations. London: Routledge, 2007.
Chandler, D. ‘The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the “Liberal Peace”.’ International Peacekeeping, 11 (1), 2004: 59–81.
Cunliffe, P. ‘Sovereignty and the Politics of Responsibility.’ In Politics Without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations, by C. Bickerton, P. Cunliffe and A. Gourevitch, 39–57. London: Routledge, 2007.
George, A., and A. Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.
Glenny, M. The Balkans: 1804–2012: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers. London: Granta Books, 2012.
Hadfield, A., and V. Hudson. ‘US and European Foreign Policy Analysis: A House Divided?’ Foreign Policy Analysis Beyond North America, K. Brummer and V. Hudson (eds.) Boulder: Lynne Rienner, forthcoming, 2015.
Likmeta, B. ‘The Balkans Break Free.’ Foreign Policy. 3 July 2013. http://www.foreignpolicy.com (accessed 1 June 2014).
Mazower, M. ‘Ethnicity and War in the Balkans.’ The National Humanities Centre. May 1997. http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/publications/hongkong/mazower.htm#N_1_ (accessed 6 August 2014).
—. Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century. London: Penguin Books, 1998.
—. The Balkans: From the End of Byzantium to the Present Day. London: Phoenix Press, 2002.
Pletsch, C. ‘The Three Worlds, or the Division of Social Scientific Labour, circa 1950–1975.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History, 23 (4), 1981: 565–590.
Schmemann, S. ‘From the Editor.’ The New York Times. 2 December 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/opinion/global/02iht-GA01schmemann.html?_r=0 (accessed 6 August 2014).
Smith, S., A. Hadfield, and T. Dunne. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Snyder, R., H. Bruck, and B. Sapin. Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954.
Starr, H. ‘Rosenau, Pre-theories and the Evolution of the Comparative Study of Foreign Policy.’ International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 14 (1), 1988: 3–15.
Telò, M. Europe: A Civilian Power? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
Tharoor, I. ‘The Balkan Wars: 100 Years Later, a History of Violence.’ Time. 8 October 2012. http://world.time.com/2012/10/08/the-balkan-wars-100-years-later-a-history-of-violence/ (accessed 6 August 2014).
UN. ‘General Assembly Resolution 60/1, World Summit Outcome.’ United Nations. 24 October 2005. http://unpanl.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan021752.pdf (accessed 6 August 2014).
Vincent, J. ‘The Place of Theory in the Practice of Human Rights.’ In Two Worlds of International Relations, by P. Beshoff and C. Hill, 29–39. London: Routledge, 1994.
von Clausewitz, C. On War. New York: Penguin Classics, 1982.
White, B. Understanding European Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
Williams, A., A. Hadfield, and S. Rofe. International History and International Relations. London: Routledge, 2012.
Wohlforth, W. ‘Realism and Foreign Policy.’ In Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors Cases, by S. Smith, A. Hadfield and T. Dunne, 35–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Amelia Hadfield
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hadfield, A. (2014). Conclusion: Foreign Policy Analysis and the Post-Yugoslav States. In: Keil, S., Stahl, B. (eds) The Foreign Policies of Post-Yugoslav States. New Perspectives on South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384133_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137384133_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48084-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38413-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)