Skip to main content

Talking Liberties: Framed Youth, Community Video and Channel 4’s Remit in Action

  • Chapter
Queer Youth and Media Cultures

Abstract

The collaborative documentary Framed Youth: Revenge of the Teenage Perverts (made in 1983, transmitted on Channel 4 in 1986) can be said to mark the emergence of gay and lesbian programming on Channel 4, which itself can be seen as a ‘product of the changing political discourses instituted by the new social movements’ (Arthurs 2004, p. 28). Jane Arthurs has cited Framed Youth as being exemplary of both Channel 4’s conscious policy to commission from people who had never made programmes before, and a ‘shift in the democratic ideal of representation to one based on speaking “from” a community instead of being spoken for’ (p. 28).

Thanks are due to Ed Webb-Ingall for sharing his research notes. Thanks also to Tony Dowmunt and Heinz Nigg for encouraging my interest in Framed Youth as an example of community video.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon. 1982. Charlotte Street Plays it Cool. Broadcast, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1987. School’s Out: Lesbian and Gay Rights and Education. Gay Teachers’ Group. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1988. Tory Protest over Gay Videos. The Times, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthurs, J. 2004. Television and Sexuality. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, G. 1990. Scratch and After: Edit Suite Technology and the Determination of Style in Video Art. In P. Hayward, ed. Culture, Technology & Creativity: In the Late Twentieth Century. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, pp. 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden, S. and Websdell, D. 1983. Community Video Looks at Disaffection. Broadcast, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines, W. 1989. Community and Organization in the New Left, 1962–1968: The Great Refusal. New York: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, S. 2011. Sexual Politics: Sexuality, Family Planning, and the British Left from the 1880s to the Present Day. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, R. 2008. United We Stand? 3Sixty, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S. 1990. Innocence and Manipulation: Censorship, Consumption and Freedom in 1980s Britain. In A. Tomlinson (ed) Consumption, Identity and Style: Marketing, Meanings and the Packaging of Pleasure. London: Routledge, pp. 102–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S. 1991. Timeshift: On Video Culture. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, D. 2006. A History of Artists’ Film and Video in Britain, 1897–2004., London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankmeijer, P. 1995. The Organization of Voluntary Gay/Lesbian Groups Offering Education on Homosexuality in the Netherlands., EduDivers (the Dutch Expertise Centre on Education and Sexual Diversity). http://www.edudivers.nl/doc/peters_publicaties/Dankmeijer%20%27Organisation%20of%20Dutch%20voluntary%20GL%20education%27%20%281995%29.pdf [Accessed January 19, 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, J. and Dungey, J. 1985. The Videoactive Report. London: Videoactive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, M. 1986. Schools ‘Targets for Gay Lib Propaganda’. The Times, October 6th, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowmunt, T. 2013. Interviewed by Ieuan Franklin for the ‘Channel 4 and British Film Culture’ Project, Goldsmiths College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, R. 1979. Out! Out! Out! — A Review of ‘Outrageous’ and ‘Word is Out’. Gay Left, 9, pp. 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. 1986. Channel 4: Doing the IBA’s Job for Them? IPPA Bulletin, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwes, C. 2005. Video Art: A Guided Tour. London: I.B.Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaxton, T. 2012. Art and Television. High Definition and High Resolution Motion Imaging: Developing Concepts on a New Medium. http://highdefinition-nomercy.blogspot.co.uk/2012_04_01_archive.html [Accessed January 18, 2014].

  • Franklin, I. 2013. Sex, Youth & Video Tape: Turn It Up and the Struggle to Be Heard. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 33(3), pp. 396–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, R. 1984. Seized Youth. The Body Politic, 106, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D.E. 1996. For a Working-Class Television: The Miners’ Campaign Tape Project. In D.E James (ed), Power Misses: Essays across (Un) Popular Culture. London: Verso, pp. 248–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, P. 1985. Taking Liberties with the Tapes: Independent Video. The Guardian, December 2nd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. and Thomas, P. 2011. Reaching Audiences: Distribution and Promotion of Alternative Moving Image. Bristol: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. and Worpole, K. 1986. Saturday Night or Sunday Morning? From Arts to Industry — New Forms of Cultural Policy. London: Comedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, H. and Wade, G. 1980. Community Media: Community Communication in the UK?: Video, Local TV, Film, and Photography. Zurich: Regenbogen-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, A. and O’Sulivan, T. 2013. Editorial. VIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture, 2(4), pp. 01–02.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Pray, M. 1985. Kitsch in Sync. AIP & Co., 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, C. 2007. Documenting Gay Men: Identity, and Performance in Reality Television and Documentary Film. Jefferson: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. 2006. TVOD: The Never-Bending Story. In P. Burston and C. Richardson, eds. A Queer Romance: Lesbians, Gay Men and Popular Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 228–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, J. 2004. The Postmodern Prince: Critical Theory, Left Strategy, and the Making of a New Political Subject. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spry, C., Nash, M., McNulty, E. and Richardson, P. 1988. Filmmakers and Broadcasters. Institute of Contemporary Arts, London. http://sounds.bl.uk/ Arts-literature-and-performance/ICA-talks/024M-C0095X0341XX-0100V0 [Accessed January 19, 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, J. 1988. Lies, Damn Lies and Dame Jill’s Lies. In the Pink, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. 1986. Independent Media and Media Education. Screen, 27(5), pp. 62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townson, I. 2012. The Brixton Fairies and the South London Gay Community Centre, Brixton 1974–1976. Urban75 Blog. http://www.urban75.org/blog/the-brixton-fairies-and-the-south-london-gay-community-centre-brixton-1974–6/ [Accessed January 19, 2014].

  • Waugh, T. 2011. The Right to Play Oneself: Looking Back on Documentary Film. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webb-Ingall, E. 2014. Communication with the Present Author, January 7th.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Ieuan Franklin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franklin, I. (2014). Talking Liberties: Framed Youth, Community Video and Channel 4’s Remit in Action. In: Pullen, C. (eds) Queer Youth and Media Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383556_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics