Abstract
If John Milton is ever to succeed in his epic task of justifying the ways of God to men, prior questions need to be addressed: what do men want? When we think of “justification,” we might think of reason, but what will give men pleasure? What will satisfy them? The education that Paradise Lost attempts might well be premised on right reason, but most of its critical cruxes come about when our own “baser” longings intersect and cross over that rational deliberativeness. Desire and attraction play central parts in the poem; though Milton does indeed try his best to foreground the superior charms of thought and rationality, he is no more successful than the liberal and Whig satirists whose visions of liberty and of what men want he in part sets out to correct. The vision in question might run like this:
I Rise at Eleven, I Dine about Two,
I get drunk before Seven, and the next thing I do;
I send for my Whore, when for fear of a Clap,
I Spend in her hand, and I Spew in her Lap;
Then we quarrel and scold, till I fall asleep,
When the Bitch, growing bold, to my Pocket does creep.
Then slyly she leaves me, and to revenge th’affront,
At once she bereaves me of Money and Cunt.
If by chance then I wake, hot-headed and drunk,
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Text is from The Works of John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, ed. Harold Love (Oxford: Clarendon, 1999), 274–75, lines 1–14. Subsequent references to this poem are to this edition and will be cited within the text parenthetically by line number. In one manuscript the title is “The Debauch.” Love also has some verses on Rochester which read like a cut-down version of this poem.
Neither Vieth nor Love attributes the poem definitely to Rochester, though both agree that it may be about him; for a short discussion of the alternatives, see Kirk Combe, “Rakes, Wives and Merchants,” in A Companion to Restoration Drama, ed. Susan J. Owen (Oxford: Blackwells, 2001) and A Martyr for Sin: Rochester’s Critique of Polity, Sexuality, and Society (New York: University of Delaware Press, 1998). Vieth attributes it to
Sackville: Attribution in Restoration Poetry: A Study of Rochester’s Poems of 1680 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963), 86–7, 168–72. Love rates it as D2 for likeness.
Susan Bordo, The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999): 87.
Evolutionary psychology sometimes wants to reiterate this; for a critique, see Cordelia Fine, Delusions of Gender (London: Icon Books, 2010).
Pierre Bourdieu, Masculine Domination, trans. Richard Nice (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001), 5–6.
Jeremy W. Webster, Performing Libertinism in Charles II’s Court: Politics, Drama, Sexuality (New York; Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 2–3.
Harold Weber, The Restoration Rake-Hero (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986).
Elaine McGirr, Lighteenth-Century Characters: A Guide to the Literature of the Age (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 29–30.
For detailed accounts of the rake and the libertine, see James Grantham Turner, “The Libertine Sublime: Love and Death in Restoration England,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 19 (1989): 99–115, and his Libertines and Radicals in Early Modern London Sexuality, Politics, and Literary Culture, 1630–1685 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002). See also
Peter Wagner, Eros Revived: Erotica of the Enlightenment in England and America (London: Secker and Warburg, 1988).
Warren Chernaik, Sexual Freedom in Restoration Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 27.
Willard Connely, Brawny Wycherley (London: Scribner, 1930), 96, cited in Webster, 12.
Rachel Weil, “Sometimes a Scepter Is Only a Scepter: Pornography and Politics in Restoration England,” in The Invention of Pornography: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500–1800, ed. Lynn Hunt (New York: Zone, 1993), 125–57; and see
Rachel Weil, Political Passions: Gender, the Family, and Political Argument in England, 1680–1714 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999).
Before March 1672; Rochester refers to it as a recent composition in a letter, which might allow us to think it a response to the 1671 Paradise Lost. The Complete Poems of John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, ed. David M. Vieth (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968), 187. All quotations from Rochester are from this edition, unless otherwise specified.
On the abject, and its role in masculine anxiety and self-definition, see Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror, trans. Leon S. Roudiez (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982); on masculinity and liquid,
see Klaus Theweleit, Male Fantasies (Cambridge: Polity, 1987).
From The Riverside Milton, ed. Roy Flannagan (Boston and New York: Houghton Mfflin, 1998), book 9, lines 445–57. All subsequent references to Milton’s poetry are to this edition, and will be cited parenthetically by book and line number.
Keith Thomas, Man and the Natural World (London: Penguin, 1984).
Melissa Sanchez, “Liberty and Romance in Rochester’s Poetry,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 38 (2005): 441–59, 445.
On the figure of the green girl, see Diane Purkiss, “Thinking of Gender,” in The Cambridge Companion to Andrew Marvell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 68–86,
and see Helen King, Hippocrates’ Woman: Reading the Female Body in Ancient Greece (London: Routledge, 1998).
John Aubrey, Brief Lives (London: Penguin, 1972), 1.219.
Samuel Pepys, Diaries, eds. R.C. Latham and W Matthews (New York: Harper Collins, 2010), 7.158 and 365, and
Andrew Marvell, “Second Advice to a Painter,” The Poems of Andrew Marvell, ed. Nigel Smith (London: Longman, 2003), 327–41.
Sigmund Freud, “Leonardo Da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood,” in The Uncanny, trans. David McLintock (London: Penguin, 2003), 45–123.
John Milton, The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce, in Complete Prose Works, vol. 2, ed. Ernest Sirluck (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959), 326.
James Grantham Turner, “The Libertine Abject: The ‘Postures’ of Last Instructions to a Painter,” in Marvell and Liberty, ed. Warren Chernaik and Martin Dzelzainis (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), 217–48, 243.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Catharine Gray and Erin Murphy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Purkiss, D. (2014). What Do Men Want? Satan, the Rake, and Masculine Desire. In: Gray, C., Murphy, E. (eds) Milton Now. Early Modern Cultural Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383105_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383105_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48036-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-38310-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)