Abstract
The American theologian Gordon H. Clark begins his book In Defense of Theology with the following assessment: “Theology, once acclaimed ‘the Queen of the Sciences,’ today hardly rises to the rank of a scullery maid; it is often held in contempt, regarded with suspicion, or just ignored” (2007, p. xxvii). This might be a little bit exaggerated and in need of qualification pending on circumstance and situation. But there is no doubt that theology has been marginalized over the centuries since the middle ages, when it first developed as an academic discipline in the medieval universities. When Uppsala University began in 1477, the first series of lectures was in theology and the teachers of the faculty of theology are still the first in the procession at the conferment ceremony in the university building. But this homage to tradition only exaggerates the new queen of the sciences, the natural sciences. The first place in the procession is about the only trace of significance of theology at the secular university.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alston, W. (1991) Perceiving God. The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press).
Augustine (1977) [414–426] Concerning the City of God Against the Pagans, translated by H. Bettenson with an introduction by D. Knowles (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).
Bråkenhielm, C. R. (1975) How Philosophy Shapes Theories of Religion (Lund: Gleeraps).
Brockman, J. (1997) ‘A New Science of Qualities. A Talk with Brian Goodwin’, available at: http://www.edge.org/conversation/a-new-science-of-qualities (accessed 26 March 2014).
Clark, G. H. (2007) In Defense of Theology (Unicoi, TN: The Trinity Foundation).
Gerdmar, A. (2008) Historical Roots of Theological Anti-Semitism. German Biblical Interpretation and the jews, from Herder and Semler to Kittel and Bultmann (Leiden: Brill).
Goodstein, L. (2011) ‘Bishops Criticize Nun’s Book’, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/3 l/nyregion/3 lfordham.html (accessed 26 March2014).
Goodwin, B. (1994) How the Leopard Changed its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity (New York: Scribner).
Jeffner, A. (1970) ‘Några problem vid livsåskådningsanalys’, Svensk teologisk kvartalsskrift, 70, 49–57.
Jeffher, A. (1995) ‘Religionen och vetenskapens anda’, in Bergmann, S. and Eidevall, G. (eds) Upptäckter i kontexten. Teologiska föreläsningar tili minne av Per Frostin, pp. 176–87 (Lund: Institutet för kontextuell teologi).
Hägglund, B. (1955) Theologie und Philosophie bei Luther und in der Occamistischen Tradition (Lund: LUÂ).
Hermerén, G. (1972) Värdering och objektivitet (Lund: Studentlitteratur).
Hunt Overzee, A. (1992) The Body Divine: The Symbol of the Body in the Works of Teilhard de Chardin and Rämänuja, Cambridge Studies in Religious Traditions 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Lindbeck, G. (1984) The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press).
Martin, L. H. and Wiebe, D. (2012a) ‘Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80, 587–97.
Martin, L. H. and Wiebe. D. (2012b) ‘When Pessimism is Realism: A Rejoinder to Our Collegues’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80, 618–22.
Pinnick, C. L., Koertge, N. and Almeder, R. F. (eds) (2003) Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: An Examination of Gender in Science (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
Russell, Bertrand (1967) [1946] History of Western Philosophy and its Connection with Political and Social Circumstances from Earliest Times to the Present Day (London: George Allen & Unwin).
Schleiermacher, R. (1960) [1830–31] Die christliche Glaube (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
Schleiermacher, F. (2003) [1830] Kurze Darstellung des theologischen Studiums 2. Auflage (Berlin: Walter de Grayter).
Taves, A. (2012) ‘A Response to Martin and Wiebe’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80, 601–4.
White, L. (1967) ‘The Historical Roots of Our Ecologie Crisis’, Science, 155, 1203–7.
Wingren, G. (1981) Tolken som tiger: Vad teologin är och vad den borde vara (Stockholm: Gummessons).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Carl Reinhold Bråkenhielm
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bråkenhielm, C.R. (2014). Theology and the Origins of Customized Science. In: Fuller, S., Stenmark, M., Zackariasson, U. (eds) The Customization of Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379610_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379610_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47888-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37961-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)