Abstract
For the intellectuals, the philosophers and the priests, the Word has always been favoured over the Image. Since Plato’s parable of the cave of shadows helping to enslave the credulous, the Image has been associated with in-authenticity, manipulation, the transient and contingent, the feeble-minded and the masses. There has been a theological dimension to this distaste for the Image. For Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan, the Image, which is by definition a finite thing, is singularly ill-equipped to represent something as infinite as God (Hobbes 2006: 34–35); hence the prohibition on Graven Images in the Jewish religion. The Word, by contrast, seemed to belong to the Mind, not matter that could decompose; it was Universal, not particular; its written manifestation belonged for a long time as the exclusive property of the ruling classes. In this context the Image threatened in effect to transfer the property of the ruling class — its cognitive concepts and moral ideas — to the masses in a form they could master. For Benjamin, this was one of the implications of the increasing mechanical reproduction of art in the 20th century: ‘the technique of reproduction detaches the reproduced object from the domain of tradition […] in permitting the reproduction to meet the beholder or listener in his own particular situation, it reactivates the object reproduced’ (Benjamin 1999a: 215).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adorno, T. W. (1973) Negative Dialectics, London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Adorno, T. W. (1981) ‘Transparencies on Film’, New German Critique, no.24/45.
Adorno, T. W. (1997) Aesthetic Theory, London: Continuum Press.
Adorno, T. W. (2001) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Oxford: Polity Press.
Benjamin, W. (1999a) Illuminations, London: Pimlico.
Benjamin, W. (1999b) The Arcades Project, Translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin, Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Buck-Morss, S. (1989) The Dialectics of Seeing, Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Engels, F. (1977) ‘Introduction to Dialectics of Nature’ in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 1, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Enzensberger, H. M. (1982) Critical Essays, New York: Continuum.
Hobbes, T. (2006) ‘Image and Idolatry’ in Images: A Reader (eds) Sunil Manghani, Arthur Piper and Jon Simons, London: Sage.
Jay, M. (1988) ‘Scopic Regimes of Modernity’ in Vision & Visuality (ed.) Hal Foster, San Franscisco: Bay Press.
Jay, M. (1994) The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lukács, G. (1971) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics, Translated by Rodney Livingstone, London: Merlin Press.
Kant, I. (1987) Critique of Judgment, Translated by Werner S. Pluhar, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Kant, I. (1996) Critique of Pure Reason, Translated by Werner S. Pluhar, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Marx, K. (1983) Capital, A Critique of Political Economy, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Trotsky, L. (1986) Trotsky’s Notebooks, 1933–1935, Translated by Philip Pomper, New York: Columbia University Text.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Mike Wayne
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wayne, M. (2014). The Dialectical Image: Kant, Marx and Adorno. In: Mazierska, E., Kristensen, L. (eds) Marx at the Movies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378613_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378613_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47837-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37861-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)