Abstract
The development of a nuclear weapons programme by North Korea and concerns about Iran’s purported attempts to develop one constitute two of the issues which featured most prominently on the international security agenda over the past decade. The EU has addressed both proliferation crises, although to different degrees. In the initial phase of the Iranian crisis, the EU profiled itself as a negotiator thanks to the links maintained with Iran by the UK, Germany, and France as well as by the absence of direct contacts between the US and the Islamic Republic. After the breakdown of negotiations, the EU imposed sanctions on the oil and financial sector, following the US approach. In the case of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPKR), the EU’s involvement has been modest and has followed the US leadership, albeit with certain distance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bassiri, T. and Santini, H. (2012) ‘EU Sanctions against Iran: New Wine in Old Bottles?’, ISPI Analysis 97, March.
Bergenäs, J. (2010) ‘The European Union’s Evolving Engagement with Iran’, Nonproliferation Review 17(3): 491–512.
Berkofsky, A. (2009) ‘The European Union in North Korea: Player or only Payer?’, ISPI Policy Brief 123, March.
Blockmans, S. and Waizer, S. (2013) ‘E3+3 Coercive Diplomacy towards Iran: Do the Economic Sanctions Add Up?’, CEPS Policy Brief No. 292, 6 June.
Charron, A. (2011) United Nations Sanctions and Conflict (London: Routledge).
Council of the European Union (2003) ‘EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)’, 157808/3 (ANNEX), Brussels, 10 December
Council of the European Union (2004) ‘Basic Principles for the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’, Doc. No: 10198/1/04 REV, Brussels, 7. June.
Eckert, S. (2009) ‘United Nations Non-proliferation Sanctions’, International Journal 65(1): 69–83.
Esfandiary, D. and Fitzpatrick, M. (2011) ‘Sanctions on Iran: Defining and Enabling Success’, Survival 53(5): 143–156.
European Parliament (2001) ‘Proposal for a Council Decision Approving the Conclusion by the Commission of an Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation (KEDO)’, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (Rapporteur: Jas Gawronski), Brussels, 4 December.
European Parliament (2002) ‘Resolution on the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation (KEDO)’, Brussels, 4 November.
Farmanfarmaian, R. (2011) ‘Iran and the EU: Re-assessing the European Role’, in L. Marchi (ed.) An EU Innovative External Action?, (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 103–130.
Ford, G. (2008) North Korea on the Brink (London: Pluto Press).
Habibi, N. (2013) ‘A Closer Look at Sanctions Relief’, Iran Matters, 9 December.
Hollande, F. (2012) Speech at the Opening Debate of the 67th General Assembly of the United Nations, New York, 25 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2014) ‘IAEA and Iran Conclude Talks in Connection with Implementation of Framework for Co-operation’, IAEA Press Release: Vienna.
Jasper, U. and Portela, C. (2010) ‘EU Defence Integration and Nuclear Weapons’, Security Dialogue 41(2): 145–168.
Kienzle, B. (2012) ‘Between Human Rights and Non-proliferation: Norm Competition in the EU’s Iran Policy’, UNISCI Discussion Papers 30.
Parsi, R. (2011) ‘Iran in the Shadow of the 2009 Presidential Elections’, ISSEU Occasional Paper 90.
Portela, C. (2003) ‘The Role of the EU in the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: The Way to Thessaloniki and Beyond’, Research Report no. 65, Hessische Stiftung für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung/ Peace Research Institute Frankfurt: Frankfurt/Main, December.
Portela, C. (2010) European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy: When and Why Do They Work? (London: Routledge).
Portela, C. (2012) ‘The EU Sanctions Operation against Syria: Conflict Management by other Means?’, UNISCI Discussion Papers 30.
Portela, C. (2014) ‘The EU, China and the Iranian Nuclear Question’, in J. Wouters, J. C. Defraigne and M. Burnay (eds) The EU, China and the World: Analysing the Relations with Developing and Emerging Countries (Chentelham: Edward Elgar), forthcoming.
Rynning, S. (2008) ‘Europe’s Emergent but Weak Strategic Culture: The Case of the EU, Iran and Nuclear Weapons Diplomacy, in K. Engelbrekt and J. Hallenberg (eds) The European Union and Strategy (London: Routledge), pp. 94–110.
Sagedhi-Boroujerdi, E. (2012) Sanctioning Iran: Implications and Consequences (Oxford: Oxford Research Group).
Sauer, T. (2011) ‘The Impact of the European Union on Iran’s Nuclear Programme’, in R. Parsi and J. Rydqvist (eds) Iran and the West (Stockholm: FOI), pp. 93–104.
Taylor, B. (2010) Sanctions as Grand Strategy (London: IISS).
Tertrais, B. (2005) ‘The European Union and Nuclear Non-proliferation: Does Soft Power Work?’, International Spectator 40(3): 45–57.
Vennesson, P. and Portela, C. (2013) ‘European Sanctions and Embargoes in Asia’, in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner and P. Murray (eds) The EU-Asia Handbook (Houndmills: Palgrave), pp. 198–210.
Yoon, S. and Suh, J. (2013) ‘Nuclear Non-proliferation’, in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner and P. Murray (eds) The EU-Asia Handbook (Houndmills: Palgrave), pp. 406–420.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Clara Portela
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Portela, C. (2015). EU Strategies to Tackle the Iranian and North Korean Nuclear Issues. In: Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D., Portela, C. (eds) The EU and the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378446_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378446_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47830-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37844-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)