Skip to main content

EU Strategies to Tackle the Iranian and North Korean Nuclear Issues

  • Chapter
The EU and the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

Abstract

The development of a nuclear weapons programme by North Korea and concerns about Iran’s purported attempts to develop one constitute two of the issues which featured most prominently on the international security agenda over the past decade. The EU has addressed both proliferation crises, although to different degrees. In the initial phase of the Iranian crisis, the EU profiled itself as a negotiator thanks to the links maintained with Iran by the UK, Germany, and France as well as by the absence of direct contacts between the US and the Islamic Republic. After the breakdown of negotiations, the EU imposed sanctions on the oil and financial sector, following the US approach. In the case of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPKR), the EU’s involvement has been modest and has followed the US leadership, albeit with certain distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bassiri, T. and Santini, H. (2012) ‘EU Sanctions against Iran: New Wine in Old Bottles?’, ISPI Analysis 97, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergenäs, J. (2010) ‘The European Union’s Evolving Engagement with Iran’, Nonproliferation Review 17(3): 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkofsky, A. (2009) ‘The European Union in North Korea: Player or only Payer?’, ISPI Policy Brief 123, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockmans, S. and Waizer, S. (2013) ‘E3+3 Coercive Diplomacy towards Iran: Do the Economic Sanctions Add Up?’, CEPS Policy Brief No. 292, 6 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charron, A. (2011) United Nations Sanctions and Conflict (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2003) ‘EU Strategy against the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)’, 157808/3 (ANNEX), Brussels, 10 December

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2004) ‘Basic Principles for the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’, Doc. No: 10198/1/04 REV, Brussels, 7. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, S. (2009) ‘United Nations Non-proliferation Sanctions’, International Journal 65(1): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfandiary, D. and Fitzpatrick, M. (2011) ‘Sanctions on Iran: Defining and Enabling Success’, Survival 53(5): 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2001) ‘Proposal for a Council Decision Approving the Conclusion by the Commission of an Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation (KEDO)’, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (Rapporteur: Jas Gawronski), Brussels, 4 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2002) ‘Resolution on the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation (KEDO)’, Brussels, 4 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmanfarmaian, R. (2011) ‘Iran and the EU: Re-assessing the European Role’, in L. Marchi (ed.) An EU Innovative External Action?, (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, G. (2008) North Korea on the Brink (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habibi, N. (2013) ‘A Closer Look at Sanctions Relief’, Iran Matters, 9 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollande, F. (2012) Speech at the Opening Debate of the 67th General Assembly of the United Nations, New York, 25 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (2014) ‘IAEA and Iran Conclude Talks in Connection with Implementation of Framework for Co-operation’, IAEA Press Release: Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, U. and Portela, C. (2010) ‘EU Defence Integration and Nuclear Weapons’, Security Dialogue 41(2): 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienzle, B. (2012) ‘Between Human Rights and Non-proliferation: Norm Competition in the EU’s Iran Policy’, UNISCI Discussion Papers 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsi, R. (2011) ‘Iran in the Shadow of the 2009 Presidential Elections’, ISSEU Occasional Paper 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, C. (2003) ‘The Role of the EU in the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: The Way to Thessaloniki and Beyond’, Research Report no. 65, Hessische Stiftung für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung/ Peace Research Institute Frankfurt: Frankfurt/Main, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, C. (2010) European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy: When and Why Do They Work? (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, C. (2012) ‘The EU Sanctions Operation against Syria: Conflict Management by other Means?’, UNISCI Discussion Papers 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, C. (2014) ‘The EU, China and the Iranian Nuclear Question’, in J. Wouters, J. C. Defraigne and M. Burnay (eds) The EU, China and the World: Analysing the Relations with Developing and Emerging Countries (Chentelham: Edward Elgar), forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynning, S. (2008) ‘Europe’s Emergent but Weak Strategic Culture: The Case of the EU, Iran and Nuclear Weapons Diplomacy, in K. Engelbrekt and J. Hallenberg (eds) The European Union and Strategy (London: Routledge), pp. 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagedhi-Boroujerdi, E. (2012) Sanctioning Iran: Implications and Consequences (Oxford: Oxford Research Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, T. (2011) ‘The Impact of the European Union on Iran’s Nuclear Programme’, in R. Parsi and J. Rydqvist (eds) Iran and the West (Stockholm: FOI), pp. 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (2010) Sanctions as Grand Strategy (London: IISS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertrais, B. (2005) ‘The European Union and Nuclear Non-proliferation: Does Soft Power Work?’, International Spectator 40(3): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennesson, P. and Portela, C. (2013) ‘European Sanctions and Embargoes in Asia’, in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner and P. Murray (eds) The EU-Asia Handbook (Houndmills: Palgrave), pp. 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. and Suh, J. (2013) ‘Nuclear Non-proliferation’, in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner and P. Murray (eds) The EU-Asia Handbook (Houndmills: Palgrave), pp. 406–420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Clara Portela

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Portela, C. (2015). EU Strategies to Tackle the Iranian and North Korean Nuclear Issues. In: Blavoukos, S., Bourantonis, D., Portela, C. (eds) The EU and the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378446_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics