Advertisement

Debate’s Relationship to Critical Thinking

  • Stephen M. Llano

Abstract

How should we imagine critical thinking? Briefly searching the Internet reveals a large number of activities and classroom concepts that treat critical thinking as a skill. Many of the best activities and approaches start with the classroom and the material of the course, developing the critical thinking skill set that should transfer to the activity of daily life.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Audience Member Public Speaking Personal Conviction Critical Thinking Ability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1984. On Rhetoric. Vol. 2, The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Branham, R. J. 1991. Debate and Critical Analysis: The Harmony of Conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Burke, K. 1968. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Elbow, P. 1998. Writing without Teachers. (second edition). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Farrell, T. 1995. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Greene, R. W., and Hicks, D. 2005. “Lost Convictions.” Cultural Studies 19 (1): 100–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gregory, M. 2005. “Turning Water into Wine.” College Teaching 53 (3): 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. hooks, b. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, N. R. 2012. “Information Infrastructure as Rhetoric: Tools for Analysis.” Poroi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis & Invention 8 (1): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leff, M. 2006. “Up from Theory: Or I Fought the Topoi and the Topoi Won.” RSQ: Rhetoric Society Quarterly 36 (2): 203–211.Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell, G. R. 2000. “Simulated Public Argument as a Pedagogical Play on Worlds.” Argumentation & Advocacy 36 (3): 134.Google Scholar
  12. Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  13. Scott, R. L. 1967. “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.” Central States Speech Journal 18 (February): 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tannen, D. 1998. The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War of Words. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  15. Whitson, S., and Poulakos, J. 1993. “Nietzsche and the Aesthetics of Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (2): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen M. Llano

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations