Teaching Critical Thinking as Inquiry

  • Sharon Bailin
  • Mark Battersby


This paper will describe and argue for an approach to foster critical thinking in higher education based on inquiry. This approach encompasses both critical thinking in everyday contexts and critical thinking within the disciplines.


Critical Thinking Minimum Wage Capital Punishment Inquiry Approach Real Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailin, S., and Battersby, M. 2009. “Inquiry: A Dialectical Approach to Teaching Critical Thinking.” In Argument Cultures, edited by Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, and Ralph H. Johnson. Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
  2. Bailin, S., and Battersby, M. 2010. Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking. Whitby, ON: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, J. A., and Johnson, R. H. 1987. “Argumentation as Dialectical.” Argumentation 1 (1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferraro, P. J., and Taylor, L. O. 2005. “Do Economists Recognize an Opportunity Cost When They See One? A Dismal Performance from the Dismal Science.” Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 4 (1): Article 7.Google Scholar
  5. Hamby, B. 2013. “Libri Ad Nauseam: The Critical Thinking Textbook Glut.” Paideusis 21 (1): 39–45.Google Scholar
  6. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. 1992. “Force Concept Inventory.” The Physics Teacher 30: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hitchcock, D. 2002. “The Practice of Argumentative Discussion.” Argumentation 6 (3): 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hitchcock, D. 2013. “Review of Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking.” Cogency 5 (2): 193–202.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, R. H. 2000. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, R. H. 2003. “The Dialectical Tier Revisited.” In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, R. H. 2007. “Anticipating Objections as a Way of Coping with Dissensus.” In Conference: Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, edited by Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, and Ralph H. Johnson. Windsor, ON: OSSA. 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Jungwirth, E. 1987. “Avoidance of Logical Fallacies: A Neglected Aspect of Science Education and Science Teacher Education.” Research in Science and Technology Education 5 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lipman, M. 1991. Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, B., and Parker, R. 2012. Critical Thinking. (tenth edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Nosich, G. 2012. Learning to Think Things Through: A Guide to Critical Thinking across the Curriculum. Tomales, CA: Foundations for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar
  17. Paul, R. 1990. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Edited by A. J. A. Binker. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.Google Scholar
  18. Siegel, H. 1988. Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Siegel, H. 1997. Rationality Redeemed? Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Vaughn, L., and MacDonald, C. 2012. The Power of Critical Thinking (second Canadian edition). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Waller, B. 2011. Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict. (sixth edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Bailin
  • Mark Battersby

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations