Advertisement

Critical Thinking for Educated Citizenship

  • Monique Volman
  • Geert ten Dam

Abstract

Among the competences that are considered necessary for a democratic way of living are “consideration for others,” “helping others,” and “caring for each other” (Westheimer and Kahne 2004). In the past few decades, however, it has been emphasized that a democratic, pluriform society not only requires citizens to be prepared to make their own contributions to society, but also to do that in a critical way (see Ten Dam and Volman 2004; Wardekker 2001). Nowadays people are not expected to “know their place” but to “determine their own position.” Of course, the extent to which a “critical” approach is valued and by whom differs, but “to be critical” has become an undeniable part of Western culture; a critical approach is frequently appreciated more than subservient accommodation. In this vein, definitions of “good citizenship” imply that citizens are willing and able to critically evaluate different perspectives, explore strategies for change and reflect upon issues of justice, (in)equality, and democratic engagement in addition to a capacity to function in a socially accepted and responsible manner within a community (Westheimer 2008). This also requires making choices and knowing why you are making that choice, respecting the choices and opinions of others, communicating about these, thereby forming your own opinion, and making it known. The interest since the 1980s in “critical thinking” as an educational goal reflects these new competences that citizenship in modern society demands.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Instructional Design Social Practice Educational Researcher Critical Pedagogy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angeli, C., and Valanides, N. 2009. “Instructional Effects on Critical Thinking: Performance on Ill-Defined Issues.” Learning and Instruction 19 (4): 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beishuizen, J. J. 2008. “Does a Community of Learmers Foster Self-Regulated Learning?” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 17 (3): 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., and Tarule, J. M. 1986. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. 1997. “Transforming Schools into Communities of Thinking and Learning about Serious Matters.” American Psychologist 52 (4): 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, A. L., and Campione, J. C. 1990. “Communities of Learning and Thinking, or a Context by Any Other Name.” In Developmental Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Thinking Skills (Contributions in Human Development, 21), edited by D. Kuhn. Basel: Karger. 108–126.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A. L., and Campione, J. C. 1994. “Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners.” In Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice: Classroom Lessons, edited by K. McGilly. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books. 229–270.Google Scholar
  8. Burbules, N. C., and Berk, R. 1999. “Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy: Relations, Differences, and Limits.” In Critical Theories in Education: Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics, edited by T. S. Popkewitz and L. Fender. New York: Routledge. 45–65.Google Scholar
  9. Campione, J. C., Shapiro, A. M., and Brown, A. L. 1995. “Forms of Transfer in a Community of Learners: Flexible Learning and Understanding.” In Teaching for Transfer. Fostering Generalization in Learning, edited by A. McKeough, J. Lupart, and A. Marini. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 35–68.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, A. 2005. “Let’s Get Beyond Community and Practice: The Many Meanings of Learning by Participating.” The Curriculum Journal 16 (1): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeström, Y. 1999. “Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation.” In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R.-L. Punamaki. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ennis, C. 1991. “Discrete Thinking Skills in Two Teachers’ Physical Education Classes.” The Elementary School Journal 91: 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ennis, R. H. 1989. “Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research.” Educational Researcher 18 (3): 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, G. 1995. “Critical Thinking: Implications for Instruction.” Reference & User Service Quarterly (RQ) 35: 27–35.Google Scholar
  15. Giroux, H. A. 1994. “Toward a Pedagogy of Critical Thinking.” In Re-Thinking Reason: New Perspectives in Critical Thinking, edited by K. S. Walters. Albany: SUNY Press. 200–201.Google Scholar
  16. Gutiérrez, K., and Rogoff, B. 2003. “Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice.” Educational Researcher 32: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halpern, D. 1998. “Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.” American Psychologist 53 (4): 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy, M., Fisher, M. B., and Ennis, R. H. 1991. “Critical Thinking: Literature Review and Needed Research.” In Educational Values and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Reform, edited by L. Idol and B. F. Jones. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. 11–40.Google Scholar
  19. Kuhn, D. 1999. “A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking.” Educational Researcher 28 (2): 16–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lipman, M. 1991. Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McLaren, P. 1994. “Foreword: Critical Thinking as a Political Project.” In Re-Thinking Reason: New Perspectives in Critical Thinking, edited by K. S. Walters. Albany: SUNY Press. 9–15.Google Scholar
  23. McPeck, J. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. McPeck, J. 1990. “Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: A Reply to Ennis.” Educational Researcher 19 (4): 10–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mercer, N. 2005. “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 1 (2): 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noddings, N. 1992. The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative to Education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nussbaum, M. 2010. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. 1991. How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Paul, R. 1992. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar
  30. Rogoff, B., Goodman Turkanis, C., and Bartlett, L. 2001. Learning Together: Children and Adults in a School Community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Mejia Arauz, R., Correa-Chávez, M., and Angelillo, C. 2003. “Firsthand Learning through Intent Participation.” Annual Review of Psychology 54: 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. 1991. “Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 1 (1): 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel, H. 1992. “The Generalizability of Critical Thinking Skills, Dispositions and Epistemology.” In The Generalizability of Critical Thinking, edited by S. P. Norris. New York: Teachers College Press. 97–108.Google Scholar
  34. Ten Dam, G., and Volman, M. 2004. “Critical Thinking as a Citizenship Competence: Teaching Strategies.” Learning and Instruction 14 (4): 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Pascarella, E. T., and Nora, A. 1995. “Influences Affecting the Development of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills.” Research in Higher Education 36: 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsui, L. 1999. “Courses and Instruction Affecting Critical Thinking.” Research in Higher Education 40: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. 2010. “Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research.” Educational Psychology Review 22: 71–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Oers, B. 2009. “Developmental Education: Improving Participation in Cultural Practices.” In Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization: Policies and Practices at Global and Local Levels—World Yearbook of Education 2009, edited by M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, and J. Tudge. New York: Routledge. 293–317.Google Scholar
  39. Van Oers, B. 2010. “Children’s Enculturation through Play.” In Challenging Play: Post Developmental Perspectives on Play and Pedagogy, edited by L. Brooker and S. Edwards. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Van Oers, B., and Wardekker, W. 1999. “On Becoming an Authentic Learner: Semiotic Activity in the Early Grades.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (2): 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Volman, M., and Ten Dam, G. 2007. “Learning and the Development of Social Identities in the Subjects Care and Technology.” British Educational Research Journal, 33 (6): 845–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wardekker, W. 1998. “Scientific Concepts and Reflection.” Mind, Culture and Activity 5: 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wardekker, W. 2001. “Schools and Moral Education: Conformism or Autonomy?” Journal of Philosophy of Education 35: 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinstein, M. 1991. “Critical Thinking and Education for Democracy.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 23: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westheimer, J. 2008. “On the Relationship between Political and Moral Engagement.” In Getting Involved: Global Citizenship Development and Sources of Moral Values, edited by F. Oser and W. Veugelers. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense. 17–29.Google Scholar
  47. Westheimer, J., and Kahne, J. 2004. “What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy.” American Educational Research Journal 41: 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique Volman
  • Geert ten Dam

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations