Making Critical Thinking Visible in Undergraduates’ Experiences of Scientific Research

  • Anna N. Wilson
  • Susan M. Howitt
  • Denise M. Higgins
  • Pamela J. Roberts


What does it look like when undergraduate students practice critical thinking in an authentic scientific research context? Do we provide such students with opportunities to show their critical thinking in action—or do we, for the most part, leave it hidden? And, if critical thinking can be made visible, how can we recognize and hence develop and assess it?


Critical Thinking Science Student High Education Research Critical Thinker Introductory Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Åkerlind, G. S. 2005. “Academic Growth and Development—How Do University Academics Experience It?” Higher Education 50 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C., and Hounsell, D. 2007. “Knowledge Practices: ‘Doing the Subject’ in Undergraduate Courses.” Curriculum Journal 18 (4): 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, D. 1997. “A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 31 (1): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. 1997. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barrie, S. C., and Prosser, M. 2004. “Generic Graduate Attributes: Citizens for an Uncertain Future.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bean, J. C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Brookfield, S. 1987. Developing Critical Thinkers. Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruce, C. S., Buckingham, L. I., Hynd, J. R., McMahon, C. A., Roggenkamp, M. G., and Stoodley, I. D. 2006. “Ways of Experiencing the Act of Learning to Program: A Phenomenographic Study of Introductory Programming Students at University.” Transforming IT Education: Promoting a Culture of Excellence, edited by Christine Bruce, George Mohay, Glenn Smith, Ian Stoodley, and Robyn Tweedale. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science. 301–325.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, M. 2006. “An ‘Infusion’ Approach to Critical Thinking: Moore on the Critical Thinking Debate.” Higher Education Research and Development 25 (2): 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.” In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman. 9–26.Google Scholar
  11. Ennis, R. H. 1992. “The Degree to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject Specific: Clarification and Needed Research.” In The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal, edited by S. Norris. New York: Teachers College Press. 21–37.Google Scholar
  12. Entwistle, N. 2009. “Teaching for Understanding at University. Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking.” Imprint 11: 7.Google Scholar
  13. Facione, P. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Concensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar
  14. Hale, E. S. 2010. A Critical Analysis of Richard Paul’s Substantive Trans-Disciplinary Conception of Critical Thinking, Cincinnati, OH: Union Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, A. 2007. “Multiplicities or Manna from Heaven? Critical Thinking and the Disciplinary Context.” Australian Journal of Education 5 (1): 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography—Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional science 10 (2): 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCune, V., and Hounsell, D. 2005. “The Development of Students’ Ways of Thinking and Practising in Three Final-Year Biology Courses.” Higher Education 49 (3): 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McPeck, J. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  19. McPeck, J. 1992. “Thoughts on Subject Specificity.” In The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal, edited by S. Norris. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Medawar, P. B. 1963. “Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud.” The Listener 70 (1798): 377–378.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, T. 2011. “Critical Thinking and Disciplinary Thinking: A Continuing Debate.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paul, R. 2005. “The State of Critical Thinking Today.” New Directions for Community Colleges 2005 (130): 27–38.Google Scholar
  23. Pithers, R. T., and Soden, R. 2000. “Critical Thinking in Education: A Review.” Educational Research 42 (3): 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna N. Wilson
  • Susan M. Howitt
  • Denise M. Higgins
  • Pamela J. Roberts

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations