Advertisement

Critical Thinking in Professional Accounting Practice: Conceptions of Employers and Practitioners

  • Samantha Sin
  • Alan Jones
  • Zijian Wang

Abstract

Over the past three decades or so it has become commonplace to lament the failure of universities to equip accounting graduates with the attributes and skills or abilities required for professional accounting practice, particularly as the latter has had to adapt to the demands of a rapidly changing business environment. With the aid of academics, professional accounting bodies have developed lists of competencies, skills, and attributes considered necessary for successful accounting practice. Employers have on the whole endorsed these lists. In this way “critical thinking” has entered the lexicon of both accountants and their employers, and when employers are asked to rank a range of named competencies in order of importance, critical thinking or some roughly synonymous term is frequently ranked highly, often at the top or near the top of their list of desirables (see, for example, Albrecht and Sack 2000). Although practical obstacles, such as content-focused curricula, have emerged to the inclusion of critical thinking as a learning objective in tertiary-level accounting courses, the presence of these obstacles has not altered “the collective conclusion from the accounting profession that critical thinking skills are a prerequisite for a successful accounting career and that accounting educators should assist students in the development of these skills” (Young and Warren 2011, 859). However, a problem that has not yet been widely recognized may lie in the language used to survey accountants and their employers, who may not be comfortable or familiar with the abstract and technicalized pedagogical discourse, for instance, the use of the phrase “developing self-regulating critical reflective capacities for sustainable feedback,” in which much skills talk is couched.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Generic Skill Critical Thinking Skill Professional Account Certified Public Accountant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accounting Education Change Commission. 1990. “Objectives of Education for Accountants: Position Statement Number One.” Issues in Accounting Education 5 (2): 307–312.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, W., and Sack, R. 2000. “Accounting Education: Charting the Course through a Perilous Future.” Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  3. American Accounting Association. 1986. “Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession, Bedford Report.” Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1999. “ CPA Vision Project: 2011 and Beyond.” New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.Google Scholar
  5. Baril, C., Cunningham, B., Fordham, D., Gardner, R., and Wolcott, S. 1998. “Critical Thinking in the Public Accounting Profession: Aptitudes and Attitudes.” Journal of Accounting Education 16 (3–4): 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, R. 1997. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Big Eight Accounting Firms. 1989. “Perspectives on Education: Capabilities for Success in the Accounting Profession (White Paper).” New York: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  9. Birkett, W. 1993. “Competency Based Standards for Professional Accountants in Australia and New Zealand.” Melbourne: ASCPA and ICAA.Google Scholar
  10. Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Vol. 19: New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  11. Bui, B., and Porter, B. 2010. “The Expectation-Performance Gap in Accounting Education: An Exploratory Study.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 19 (1–2): 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camp, J., and Schnader, A. 2010. “Using Debate to Enhance Critical Thinking in the Accounting Classroom: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and US Tax Policy.” Issues in Accounting Education 25 (4): 655–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CPA Australia and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. 2012. “Professional Accreditation Guidelines for Australian Accounting Degrees.” Melbourne and Sydney: CPA Australia and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Craig, R., and McKinney, C. 2010. “A Successful Competency-Based Writing Skills Development Programme: Results of an Experiment.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 19 (3): 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deal, K. 2004. “The Relationship between Critical Thinking and Interpersonal Skills: Guidelines for Clinical Supervision.” The Clinical Supervisor 22 (2): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doney, L., Lephardt, N., and Trebby, J. 1993. “Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Accounting Students.” Journal of Education for Business 68 (5): 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunn, D., and Smith, R. 2008. “Writing as Critical Thinking.” In Teaching Critical Thinking in Psycholog y: A Handbook of Best Practices, edited by D. S. Dunn, J. S. Halonen, and R. A. Smith, 1st ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Entwistle, N. 1994. Teaching and Quality of Learning: What Can Research and Development Offer to Policy and Practice in Higher Education. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  19. Facione, P. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction, “The Delphi Report.” Millbrae, CA: American Philosophical Association, The California Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Facione, P., Facione, N., and Giancario, C. 1997. Professional Judgement and the Disposition towards Critical Thinking. Millbrae, CA: Californian Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Facione, P., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., and Gainen, J. 1995. “The Disposition toward Critical Thinking.” The Journal of General Education 44 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  22. Flower, L., and Hayes, J. 1984. “Images, Plans, and Prose: The Representation of Meaning in Writing.” Written Communication 1 (1): 120–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman, M., Hancock, P., Simpson, L., Sykes, C., Petocz, P., Densten, I., and Gibson, K. 2008. “Business as Usual: A Collaborative and Inclusive Investigation of the Existing Resources, Strengths, Gaps and Challenges to Be Addressed for Sustainability in Teaching and Learning in Australian University Business Faculties.” Scoping Report, Australian Business Deans Council. http://www.olt.gov.au/project-business-usual-collaborative-sydney-2006.Google Scholar
  24. Galbraith, M. 1998. Adult Learning Methods: A Guide for Effective Instruction. Washington, DC: ERIC Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Giancarlo, C., and Facione, P. 2001. “A Look across Four Years at the Disposition toward Critical Thinking among Undergraduate Students.” The Journal of General Education 50 (1): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hancock, P., Howieson, B., Kavanagh, M., Kent, J., Tempone, I., and Segal, N. 2009. “Accounting for the Future: More Than Numbers, Final Report.” Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council Ltd. http://www.altc.edu.au.Google Scholar
  27. Hayes, J., and Flower, L. 1987. “On the Structure of the Writing Process.” Topics in Language Disorders 7 (4): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyland, K. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, M., Watty, K., Yu, L., and Lowe, L. 2006. “Assessing Students Unfamiliar with Assessment Practices in Australian Universities, Final Report.” Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council Ltd.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, A. 2010. “Generic Attributes in Accounting: The Significance of the Disciplinary Context.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 19 (1–2): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, A., and Sin, S. 2003. Generic Skills in Accounting: Competencies for Students and Graduates. Sydney: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, A., and Sin, S. 2004. “Integrating Language with Content in First Year Accounting: Student Profiles, Perceptions and Performance.” In Integrating Content and Language: Meeting the Challenge of a Multilingual Higher Education , edited by R. Wilkinsoned. Maastricht: Maastricht University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, A., and Sin, S. 2013. “Achieving Professional Trustworthiness: Communicative Expertise and Identity Work in Professional Accounting Practice.” In Discourses of Ethics , edited by C. Candlin and J. Crichtoned. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Kavanagh, M., and Drennan, L. 2008. “What Skills and Attributes Does an Accounting Graduate Need? Evidence from Student Perceptions and Employer Expectations.” Accounting and Finance 48 (2): 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kimmel, P. 1995. “A Framework for Incorporating Critical Thinking into Accounting Education.” Journal of Accounting Education 13 (3): 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, P., and Kitchener, K. 2004. “Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development of Epistemic Assumptions through Adulthood.” Educational Psychologist 39 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kurfiss, J. 1988. Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice and Possibilities. Washington: ASHE-Eric Higher Education Report No. 2, Associate for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  38. Kurfiss, J. 1989. “Helping Faculty Foster Students’ Critical Thinking in the Disciplines.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 37 (1): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucas, U. 2008. “Being “Pulled up Short”: Creating Moments of Surprise and Possibility in Accounting Education.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19 (3): 383–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menary, R. 2007. “Writing as Thinking.” Language Sciences 29 (5): 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Metlay, D., and Sarewitz, D. 2012. “Decision Strategies for Addressing Complex, “Messy” Problems.” The Bridge on Social Sciences and Engineering Practice 42 (3): 6–16.Google Scholar
  42. Mezirow, J. 2000. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectivesona Theory in Progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series, Washington, DC: ERIC Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, G. 1988. “Accounting as Reality Construction: Towards a New Epistemology for Accounting Practice.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 13 (5): 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Partnership for Public Service and Institute for Public Policy Implementation. 2007. The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: American University.Google Scholar
  45. Paul, R. 1989. Critical Thinking Handbook: High School. A Guide for Redesigning Instruction. Washington, DC: ERIC Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Sarangi, S., and Candlin, C. 2010. “Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice: Mapping a Future Agenda.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Serrat, O. 2011. Critical Thinking. Washington, DC: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  48. Simon, H. 1974. “The Structure of Ill Structured Problems.” Artificial Intelligence 4 (3): 181–201.Google Scholar
  49. Sin, S. 2010. “Considerations of Quality in Phenomenographic Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods no. 9 (4): 305–319.Google Scholar
  50. Sin, S. 2011. An Investigation of Practitioners’ and Students’ Conceptions of Accounting Work. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sin, S., Jones, A., and Petocz, P. 2007. “Evaluating a Method of Integrating Generic Skills with Accounting Content Based on a Functional Theory of Meaning.” Accounting and Finance 47 (1): 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sin, S., Reid, A., and Dahlgren, L. 2011. “The Conceptions of Work in the Accounting Profession in the Twenty-First Century from the Experiences of Practitioners.” Studies in Continuing Education 33 (2): 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tempone, I., and Martin, E. 2003. “Iteration between Theory and Practice as a Pathway to Developing Generic Skills in Accounting.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 12 (3): 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thompson, J., and Tuden, A. 1959. “Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision.” In Comparative Studies in Administration edited by J. Thompson, P. Hammond, R. Hawkes, B. Junker, and A. Tudened. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 195–216.Google Scholar
  55. van Peursem, K. 2005. “Conversations with Internal Auditors: The Power of Ambiguity.” Managerial Auditing Journal 20 (5): 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang, F. 2007. Conceptions of Critical Thinking Skills in Accounting from the Perspective of Accountants in Their First Year of Experience in the Profession , Macquarie University Honours Thesis.Google Scholar
  57. Watson, T. 2004. “Managers, Managism, and the Tower of Babble: Making Sense of Managerial Pseudojargon.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language (166): 67–82.Google Scholar
  58. White, L. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Young, M., and Warren, D. 2011. “Encouraging the Development of Critical Thinking Skills in the Introductory Accounting Courses Using the Challenge Problem Approach.” Issues in Accounting Education 26 (4): 859–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha Sin
  • Alan Jones
  • Zijian Wang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations