Advertisement

Virtue and Inquiry: Bridging the Transfer Gap

  • Tracy Bowell
  • Justine Kingsbury

Abstract

When the benefits of tertiary education are listed, the development of critical thinking is often near the top of the list (Bok 2006). The critical thinker can, among other things, assess evidence, judge the relevance of new information to existing beliefs, and break down a complex problem into less complex parts and work through them in an orderly way. Abilities like these are useful in myriad contexts beyond the classroom. It is easy to see why critical thinking is seized upon as an important part of higher education’s contribution to transforming students into lifelong learners.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Tennis Player Critical Thinking Skill Intellectual Virtue Virtue Epistemologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aberdein, A. 2010. “Virtue in Argument.” Argumentation 24: 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behar-Horenstein, L., and Niu, L. 2011. “Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning 8 (2): 25–41.Google Scholar
  3. Bok, D. 2006. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowell, T., and Kemp, G. 2014. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. (third fourth edition). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Code, L. 1984. “Towards a ‘Responsibilist’ Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, D. 2009. “Keeping an Open Mind and Having a Sense of Proportion as Virtues in Argumentation.” Cogency 1 (2): 49–64.Google Scholar
  7. Ennis, R. 1994. “Critical Thinking Dispostions: Their Nature and Assessability.” Informal Logic 18 (2): 165–182.Google Scholar
  8. Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garner, R. 1990. “When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings.” Review of Educational Research 60 (4): 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg, I., Kingsbury, J., and Bowell, T. 2014. Measuring Critical Thinking about Deeply Held Beliefs. In Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for Argumentation, edited by Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewinski. Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
  11. Lepock, C. 2011. “Unifying the Intellectual Virtues.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 106–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paul, R. 2000. “Critical Thinking, Moral Integrity, and Citizenship: Teaching for the Intellectual Virtues.” In Knowledge, Belief and Character, edited by G. Axtell. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Salmon, M. 2012. Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. (sixth edition). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  14. Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tishman, S., Jay, E. and Perkins, D. 1993. “Teaching Thinking Dispositions: From Transmission to Enculturation.” Theory into Practice 32 (3): 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Waller, B. 2011. Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict (sixth edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  17. Zagzebski, L. T. 1996. Virtues of the Mind : An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy Bowell
  • Justine Kingsbury

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations