Abstract
In this chapter, we empirically apply theories of heterogeneity to narrative voice in the Japanese Decadent literature of the post-Russo-Japanese War period. Our purpose here is to shed new light on the role of complex socio-cultural sensibilities as a form of non-material labor, acknowledging those psychic effects as a significant contributor to Japanese Decadence. Drawing mainly on Mikhail Bakhtin’s theory of heteroglossia, we will examine the process through which the self is constructed via interactions with heterogeneous others who share and differentiate socio-cultural beliefs. In so doing, we will extend our consideration to the issue of dilettantism through which the subject negotiates with multiple spectrums of ongoing cultural modernity. Within the framework of dialogic interaction, Japanese Decadents remained calm and self-reflexive, in contrast with the turbulent psychological agitation that fin-de-siècle European Decadents tended to evince. For Japanese Aesthetes of the epoch, “decadence” was a novelty as well as a new cultural platform, wherein they witnessed the decay of indigenous traditions and the rise of Japan’s eclectic culture. In reality, their psychological dispositions were, generally in a positive sense, closer to those of dilettantes. With these perspectives in mind, we will focus on two stories considered to be seminal to the fiction of Japanese Decadence and kichōsha (returnee from the West) stories: Nagai Kafū’s Reishō [Sneers] (1910) and Ueda Bin’s Uzumaki [The Vortex] (1910).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Itō Sei, Nihon bundanshi vol. 15: Kindaigeki undō no hossoku [The History of Japanese Literary Circles vol. 15: The Inauguration of the Modern Movement of Drama]. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 1997, pp. 181–2.
The essay “Kizokushugi to Heiminshugi” [Aristocratism and Populism] was first published in the July and September 1911 issues of Kyōto kyōiku [Kyoto Education], Ueda Bin, Teihon Ueda Bin zenshū vol. 5. Tokyo: Kyōku Shuppan, 1985, pp. 57–69.
Richard Gilman, Decadence: The Strange Life of an Epithet. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1979, p. 101.
Théophile Gautier, “Preface to ‘The Flowers of Evil,’” in The Flowers of Evil, ed. Charles Baudelaire, trans. Keith Waldrop. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 2006, pp. 17–18.
Richard Dellamora, “Productive Decadence: ‘The Queer Comradeship of Outlawed Thought’: Vernon Lee, Max Nordau, and Oscar Wilde.” New Literary History 35.4 (2004): p. 530.
Charles Baudelaire, “The Poem of Hashish,” On Wine and Hashish. London: Hesperus, 2002, p. 75.
M. M. Bakhtin, “Discourse in the Novel,” The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981, pp. 312–13.
Edward Seidensticker, Kafū the Scribbler. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965, p. 34.
Stephen Snider, Fictions of Desire. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000, p. 55, and
Rachael Hutchinson, “Occidentalism and the Critique of Meiji: The West in the Returnee Stories of Nagai Kafū,” Japan Forum 13.2 (2001): p. 206.
Yoshida Seiichi, Nagai Kafū. Tokyo: Nihon Tosho Sentā, 1971, p. 70.
Isoda Kōichi, Nagai Kafū. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 1980, p. 113.
Komori Yōichi, Yuragi no nihon bungaku [Japanese Literature in Fluctuation]. Tokyo: NHK Books, 1998, pp. 172–3.
Barbara Spackman, Decadent Genealogies: The Rhetoric of Sickness from Baudelaire to D’Annunzio. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989, pp. 38–9.
Critics such as Matsumoto Hajime attribute Kafū’s decadence to his failure to vindicate the leftists who were convicted for their plot to assassinate the Meiji Emperor. See Matsumoto Hajime, Kafū gokuraku. Tokyo: Sanseidō, 1998, p. 39.
Satō Haruo, Shōsetsu Nagai Kafū den [A Novelistic Biography of Nagai Kafū]. Tokyo: Iwanami, 2009, p. 264.
Robert M. Kaplan, “Being Bleuler: The Second Century of Schizophrenia,” Australasian Psychiatry 16.5 (2008): p. 309.
Nagai Kafū, Reishō [Sneers]. Tokyo: Iwanami, 1950, p. 5.
Ryū Kenki. Kichōsha Kafū [The Returnee Kafū]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, 1993, p. 103.
See Naruse Masakatsu, “Taishōbungaku no mondaiten” [Problems in Taishō Literature], in Taisho no Bungaku, ed. Nihon Bungaku Kenkyū Shiryō Kankōkai. Tokyo: Yūseidō, 1988, p. 61.
See Ueda Bin, “Uzumaki” [The Vortex], in Teihon Ueda Bin zenshū vol. 2. Tokyo: Kyōiku Shuppan, 1985, pp. 513–4.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “Phenomenology of Perception,” Basic Writings, ed. Thomas Baldwin. New York: Routledge, 2004, p. 153.
Elaine Gerbert, “Space and Aesthetic Imagination in Some Taishō Writings,” Japan’s Competing Modernities: Issues in Culture and Democracy 1900–1930, ed. Sharon A. Minichello. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1998, p. 70. She gives an example of the nativist anthropology developed by Yanagita Kunio and Orikuchi Shinobu.
Mihai I. Spariosu, The Wreath of Wild Olive. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997, p. 29.
Dennis Washburn, The Dilemma of the Modern in Japanese Fiction. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995, p. 2.
Copyright information
© 2013 Ikuho Amano
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amano, I. (2013). Decadent Returnees: The Dialogic Labor of Sensibility in Nagai Kafū’s Sneers and Ueda Bin’s The Vortex. In: Decadent Literature in Twentieth-Century Japan. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377432_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377432_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48004-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37743-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)