Advertisement

The Global as Local/Othello as Omkara

  • Brinda Charry
  • Gitanjali Shahani
Part of the Reproducing Shakespeare: New Studies in Adaptation and Appropriation book series (RESH)

Abstract

Although the 1965 Merchant Ivory production, Shakespeare Wallah, sets up Hindi cinema as a cultural form that is radically different from and in competition with Shakespearean theater, the genre does have a long history of engagement with the works of William Shakespeare. 1 The history of Shakespeare in India is itself a fairly long one. Performed first in Calcutta and Bombay in the 1770s as entertainment to the early traders, eventually made a staple of an educational system dictated by colonial policy, and soon after translated into Indian languages and played on stage in Calcutta, Bombay, and other urban centers, early Hindi film remakes of Shakespeare were adaptations of the well-known Parsi theater productions. The 1927 silent film Dil Farosh, for instance, was a cinematic version of an early twentieth-century stage version of The Merchant of Venice and the 1932 film Hathili Dulhan was a remake of the popular Parsi theater version of The Taming of the Shrew.2 Adaptation has long been considered acceptable in Indian artistic traditions, and is perceived neither as indicative of an embarrassing lack of “originality,” nor as transgressive or revisionary. Discussing the history of Shakespearean performance in India, Poonam Trivedi points out that in the Indian tradition the practice of adaptation is seen as permitting “rewritings to exist without challenging the status of the ‘original’ urtext. And what is more, in the multilingual context of the subcontinent, it functions as localizing, indigenizing, and ultimately democratizing factor: just as the Sanskrit epics had been reworked in the regional languages, so was Shakespeare adapted into local cultures.” 3

Keywords

Indian Cinema Love Story Fashionable Brand Multilingual Context Sanskrit Epic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Film Theory and Criticism. Edited by Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. 791–812.Google Scholar
  2. Burnett, Mark. Filming Shakespeare in the Global Marketplace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boose, Lynda E. and Richard Burt, “Totally Clueless? Shakespeare goes Hollywood in the 1990s.” Shakespeare the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video. Edited by Lynda E. Boose and Richard Burt. New York: Routledge, 1997. 8–22.Google Scholar
  4. Cartelli, Thomas and Katherine Rowe, New Wave Shakespeare on Screen. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Chakravarti, Paromita. “Modernity, Postcoloniality and Othello: The case of Saptapadi.” Remaking Shakespeare: Performance across Medias, Genres, and Cultures. Edited by Pascale Aebischer, Edward Esche, and Nigel Wheale. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. 39–55.Google Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, Bankim Chandra. “Shakuntala, Miranda, and Desdemona.” Bibidha Prabandha. Calcutta: Bangiya Sahitya Parishad, 1939.Google Scholar
  7. Chatterjee, Partha. “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question.” Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid. New Delhi: Zubaan Publications, 2007. 233–52.Google Scholar
  8. Dionne, Craig and Parmita Kapadia, “Introduction.” Native Shakespeares: Indigenous Appropriations on a Global Stage. Edited by Craig Dionne and Paramita Kapadia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 1–15.Google Scholar
  9. Dirlik, Arif. “The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism.” Critical Inquiry 20. 2 (1994). 328–56.Google Scholar
  10. Ganti, Tejaswini. Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. Jameson, Frederic. Post-modernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Lalwani, Vickey. “Why Omkara flopped at the Box Office?” http://www.bollyvista.com/article/a/32/6997. August 30, 2006. Accessed January 19, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Loomba, Ania. Gender, Race, Renaissance Drama. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  14. Loomba, Ania. “Local-Manufacture-Made-in-India Othello Fellows: Issues of Race, Hyrbridity and Location in Post-olonial Shakespeares.” Post-colonial Shakespeares. Edited by Ania Loomba and Martin Orkin. New York: Routledge, 1998. 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Massai, Sonia. “Introduction.” World-Wide Shakespeare: Local Appropriation in Film and Performance. New York: Routledge, 2004. 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mazumdar, Ranjani. Bombay Cinema: An Archive of a City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Mishra, Vijay. Bollywood Cinema: Temples of Desire. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. “The ‘Bollywoodization’ of the Indian Cinema: Cultural Nationalism in a Global Arena.” The Inter -Asia Cultural Studies Reader. Edited by Kuan Hsing Chen and Chua Beng Huat. Routledge: New York, 2007. 449–66.Google Scholar
  19. Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. The Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999. 137Google Scholar
  20. Rushdie, Salman. The Moor’s Last Sigh. London: Vintage, 1995.Google Scholar
  21. Salter, Dennis. “Acting Shakespeare in Postcolonial Space.” Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance. Edited by James Bulman. New York: Routledge, 1996. 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh, Jyotsna and Sudipto Chatterjee. “Moor or Less? The Surveillance of Othello.” Shakespeare and Appropriation. Edited by Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer. New York: Routledge, 1999. 65–85.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, Gary. “Afterword: The Incredible Shrinking Bard.” Shakespeare and Appropriation. Edited by Christy Desmet and Robert Sawyer. New York: Routledge, 1999. 197–206.Google Scholar
  24. Trivedi, Poonam. “‘It is the bloody business that informs thus...’: Local politics and Performative Praxis, Macbeth in India.” Worldwide Shakespeares: Local appropriation in Film and Performance. Edited by Sonia Massai. New York: Routledge, 2006. 47–56.Google Scholar
  25. Vasudevan, Ravi S. Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. Verma, Rajiva. “Shakespeare in Hindi Cinema.” India’s Shakespeare: Translation, Interpretation, and Performance. Edited by Poonam Trivedi and Dennis Bartholomeusz. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005. 269–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Craig Dionne and Parmita Kapadia 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brinda Charry
  • Gitanjali Shahani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations